From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabrice Gasnier" <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: stm32: Minor cleanups
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:05:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016110601.1765415-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Looking at Fabrice's STM32 patches I noticed that we're now passing the
breakinput values (u32) into a function via int parameters. The easiest
way to fix this inconsistency is by just passing a pointer to the break
input structure. There's some preparatory work here that makes the code
slightly more readable, in my opinion. I ended up squashing two patches
into one in v2 because the second patch from v1 is already addressed in
patch 1 of v2. I've added a patch in v2 that validates device tree data
for breakinput as suggested by Uwe.
Lee, patch 1 of this small series touches the MFD header for the STM32
timers, but there's no good way to separate the patches, so if you could
provide an Acked-by on that patch so that I can take it through the PWM
tree along with the rest, that'd be great.
Thierry
Thierry Reding (3):
pwm: stm32: Remove clutter from ternary operator
pwm: stm32: Pass breakinput instead of its values
pwm: stm32: Validate breakinput data from DT
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++---------------
include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 12 ++++-------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 11:05 Thierry Reding [this message]
2019-10-16 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm: stm32: Remove clutter from ternary operator Thierry Reding
2019-10-16 11:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-16 13:06 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 7:23 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-16 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: stm32: Pass breakinput instead of its values Thierry Reding
2019-10-16 11:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-16 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pwm: stm32: Validate breakinput data from DT Thierry Reding
2019-10-16 11:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-16 13:07 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-16 14:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191016110601.1765415-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox