* [PATCH] pwm: atmel: Don't use pwm consumer API
@ 2024-01-29 8:56 Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-03 15:46 ` claudiu beznea
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2024-01-29 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudiu Beznea, Nicolas Ferre, Alexandre Belloni
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel
Lowlevel driver callbacks are not supposed to use the consumer API
functions. Currently this works, but with the upcoming locking changes
this probably results in dead locks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
index 47bcc8a3bf9d..26573829e391 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
@@ -294,19 +294,16 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm = to_atmel_pwm_chip(chip);
- struct pwm_state cstate;
unsigned long cprd, cdty;
u32 pres, val;
int ret;
- pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
-
if (state->enabled) {
unsigned long clkrate = clk_get_rate(atmel_pwm->clk);
- if (cstate.enabled &&
- cstate.polarity == state->polarity &&
- cstate.period == state->period) {
+ if (pwm->state.enabled &&
+ pwm->state.polarity == state->polarity &&
+ pwm->state.period == state->period) {
u32 cmr = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR);
cprd = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm,
@@ -328,7 +325,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
atmel_pwm_calculate_cdty(state, clkrate, cprd, pres, &cdty);
- if (cstate.enabled) {
+ if (pwm->state.enabled) {
atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, false);
} else {
ret = clk_enable(atmel_pwm->clk);
@@ -348,7 +345,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
atmel_pwm_ch_writel(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR, val);
atmel_pwm_set_cprd_cdty(chip, pwm, cprd, cdty);
atmel_pwm_writel(atmel_pwm, PWM_ENA, 1 << pwm->hwpwm);
- } else if (cstate.enabled) {
+ } else if (pwm->state.enabled) {
atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, true);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pwm: atmel: Don't use pwm consumer API
2024-01-29 8:56 [PATCH] pwm: atmel: Don't use pwm consumer API Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2024-02-03 15:46 ` claudiu beznea
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: claudiu beznea @ 2024-02-03 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König, Nicolas Ferre, Alexandre Belloni
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel
On 29.01.2024 10:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Lowlevel driver callbacks are not supposed to use the consumer API
> functions. Currently this works, but with the upcoming locking changes
> this probably results in dead locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> index 47bcc8a3bf9d..26573829e391 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
> @@ -294,19 +294,16 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> const struct pwm_state *state)
> {
> struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm = to_atmel_pwm_chip(chip);
> - struct pwm_state cstate;
> unsigned long cprd, cdty;
> u32 pres, val;
> int ret;
>
> - pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
> -
> if (state->enabled) {
> unsigned long clkrate = clk_get_rate(atmel_pwm->clk);
>
> - if (cstate.enabled &&
> - cstate.polarity == state->polarity &&
> - cstate.period == state->period) {
> + if (pwm->state.enabled &&
> + pwm->state.polarity == state->polarity &&
> + pwm->state.period == state->period) {
> u32 cmr = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR);
>
> cprd = atmel_pwm_ch_readl(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm,
> @@ -328,7 +325,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>
> atmel_pwm_calculate_cdty(state, clkrate, cprd, pres, &cdty);
>
> - if (cstate.enabled) {
> + if (pwm->state.enabled) {
> atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, false);
> } else {
> ret = clk_enable(atmel_pwm->clk);
> @@ -348,7 +345,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> atmel_pwm_ch_writel(atmel_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, PWM_CMR, val);
> atmel_pwm_set_cprd_cdty(chip, pwm, cprd, cdty);
> atmel_pwm_writel(atmel_pwm, PWM_ENA, 1 << pwm->hwpwm);
> - } else if (cstate.enabled) {
> + } else if (pwm->state.enabled) {
> atmel_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, true);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-03 15:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-29 8:56 [PATCH] pwm: atmel: Don't use pwm consumer API Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-03 15:46 ` claudiu beznea
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox