From: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@fnnas.com>
To: <linan666@huaweicloud.com>, <song@kernel.org>
Cc: <xni@redhat.com>, <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yukuai@fnnas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] md: Clean up folio sync support related code
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 00:52:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b8ba3a3-ce7e-4fd0-aacb-3ea62876acc8@fnnas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128075708.2259525-7-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Hi,
在 2026/1/28 15:57, linan666@huaweicloud.com 写道:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
>
> 1. Remove resync_get_all_folio() and invoke folio_get() directly instead.
> 2. Clean up redundant while(0) loop in md_bio_reset_resync_folio().
> 3. Clean up bio variable by directly referencing r10_bio->devs[j].bio
> instead in r1buf_pool_alloc() and r10buf_pool_alloc().
> 4. Clean up RESYNC_PAGES.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid1-10.c | 22 ++++++----------------
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 6 ++----
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
I think this patch can be merged into patch 5.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> index 300fbe9dc02e..568ab002691f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /* Maximum size of each resync request */
> #define RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE (64*1024)
> -#define RESYNC_PAGES ((RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE-1) / PAGE_SIZE)
> #define RESYNC_SECTORS (RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE >> 9)
>
> /*
> @@ -56,11 +55,6 @@ static inline void resync_free_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
> folio_put(rf->folio);
> }
>
> -static inline void resync_get_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
> -{
> - folio_get(rf->folio);
> -}
> -
> static inline struct folio *resync_fetch_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
> {
> return rf->folio;
> @@ -80,16 +74,12 @@ static void md_bio_reset_resync_folio(struct bio *bio, struct resync_folio *rf,
> int size)
> {
> /* initialize bvec table again */
> - do {
> - struct folio *folio = resync_fetch_folio(rf);
> - int len = min_t(int, size, RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE);
> -
> - if (WARN_ON(!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, len, 0))) {
> - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> - bio_endio(bio);
> - return;
> - }
> - } while (0);
> + if (WARN_ON(!bio_add_folio(bio, resync_fetch_folio(rf),
> + min_t(int, size, RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE),
> + 0))) {
> + bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + }
> }
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index d9c106529289..5954ead7dfd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -181,18 +181,16 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
> for (j = 0; j < conf->raid_disks * 2; j++) {
> struct resync_folio *rf = &rfs[j];
>
> - bio = r1_bio->bios[j];
> -
> if (j < need_folio) {
> if (resync_alloc_folio(rf, gfp_flags))
> goto out_free_folio;
> } else {
> memcpy(rf, &rfs[0], sizeof(*rf));
> - resync_get_folio(rf);
> + folio_get(rf->folio);
> }
>
> rf->raid_bio = r1_bio;
> - bio->bi_private = rf;
> + r1_bio->bios[j]->bi_private = rf;
> }
>
> r1_bio->master_bio = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 7533aeb23819..5c0975ec8809 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -183,19 +183,17 @@ static void * r10buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
> if (rbio)
> rf_repl = &rfs[nalloc + j];
>
> - bio = r10_bio->devs[j].bio;
> -
> if (!j || test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC,
> &conf->mddev->recovery)) {
> if (resync_alloc_folio(rf, gfp_flags))
> goto out_free_folio;
> } else {
> memcpy(rf, &rfs[0], sizeof(*rf));
> - resync_get_folio(rf);
> + folio_get(rf->folio);
> }
>
> rf->raid_bio = r10_bio;
> - bio->bi_private = rf;
> + r10_bio->devs[j].bio->bi_private = rf;
> if (rbio) {
> memcpy(rf_repl, rf, sizeof(*rf));
> rbio->bi_private = rf_repl;
--
Thansk,
Kuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-04 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 7:56 [PATCH v2 00/14] folio support for sync I/O in RAID linan666
2026-01-28 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] md/raid1,raid10: clean up of RESYNC_SECTORS linan666
2026-02-04 16:29 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] md: introduce sync_folio_io for folio support in RAID linan666
2026-02-04 16:38 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] md/raid1: use folio for tmppage linan666
2026-02-04 16:45 ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-05 7:23 ` Li Nan
2026-02-05 7:33 ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-06 9:07 ` Li Nan
2026-01-28 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] md/raid10: " linan666
2026-01-28 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] md/raid1,raid10: use folio for sync path IO linan666
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] md: Clean up folio sync support related code linan666
2026-02-04 16:52 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2026-02-05 7:27 ` Li Nan
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] md/raid1: clean up useless sync_blocks handling in raid1_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] md/raid1: fix IO error at logical block size granularity linan666
2026-02-04 16:54 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] md/raid10: " linan666
2026-02-04 16:55 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] md/raid1,raid10: clean up resync_fetch_folio linan666
2026-02-04 16:57 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] md: clean up resync_free_folio linan666
2026-02-04 16:59 ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] md/raid1: clean up sync IO size calculation in raid1_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] md/raid10: clean up sync IO size calculation in raid10_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] md/raid1,raid10: fall back to smaller order if sync folio alloc fails linan666
2026-02-04 16:48 ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-05 7:29 ` Li Nan
2026-02-04 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] folio support for sync I/O in RAID Yu Kuai
2026-02-05 12:57 ` Li Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b8ba3a3-ce7e-4fd0-aacb-3ea62876acc8@fnnas.com \
--to=yukuai@fnnas.com \
--cc=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox