Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@fnnas.com>
To: <linan666@huaweicloud.com>, <song@kernel.org>
Cc: <xni@redhat.com>, <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	 <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yukuai@fnnas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] md: Clean up folio sync support related code
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 00:52:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b8ba3a3-ce7e-4fd0-aacb-3ea62876acc8@fnnas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128075708.2259525-7-linan666@huaweicloud.com>

Hi,

在 2026/1/28 15:57, linan666@huaweicloud.com 写道:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
>
> 1. Remove resync_get_all_folio() and invoke folio_get() directly instead.
> 2. Clean up redundant while(0) loop in md_bio_reset_resync_folio().
> 3. Clean up bio variable by directly referencing r10_bio->devs[j].bio
>     instead in r1buf_pool_alloc() and r10buf_pool_alloc().
> 4. Clean up RESYNC_PAGES.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/md/raid1-10.c | 22 ++++++----------------
>   drivers/md/raid1.c    |  6 ++----
>   drivers/md/raid10.c   |  6 ++----
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

I think this patch can be merged into patch 5.

> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> index 300fbe9dc02e..568ab002691f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>   /* Maximum size of each resync request */
>   #define RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE (64*1024)
> -#define RESYNC_PAGES ((RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE-1) / PAGE_SIZE)
>   #define RESYNC_SECTORS (RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE >> 9)
>   
>   /*
> @@ -56,11 +55,6 @@ static inline void resync_free_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
>   	folio_put(rf->folio);
>   }
>   
> -static inline void resync_get_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
> -{
> -	folio_get(rf->folio);
> -}
> -
>   static inline struct folio *resync_fetch_folio(struct resync_folio *rf)
>   {
>   	return rf->folio;
> @@ -80,16 +74,12 @@ static void md_bio_reset_resync_folio(struct bio *bio, struct resync_folio *rf,
>   			       int size)
>   {
>   	/* initialize bvec table again */
> -	do {
> -		struct folio *folio = resync_fetch_folio(rf);
> -		int len = min_t(int, size, RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE);
> -
> -		if (WARN_ON(!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, len, 0))) {
> -			bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> -			bio_endio(bio);
> -			return;
> -		}
> -	} while (0);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!bio_add_folio(bio, resync_fetch_folio(rf),
> +				   min_t(int, size, RESYNC_BLOCK_SIZE),
> +				   0))) {
> +		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> +		bio_endio(bio);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index d9c106529289..5954ead7dfd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -181,18 +181,16 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
>   	for (j = 0; j < conf->raid_disks * 2; j++) {
>   		struct resync_folio *rf = &rfs[j];
>   
> -		bio = r1_bio->bios[j];
> -
>   		if (j < need_folio) {
>   			if (resync_alloc_folio(rf, gfp_flags))
>   				goto out_free_folio;
>   		} else {
>   			memcpy(rf, &rfs[0], sizeof(*rf));
> -			resync_get_folio(rf);
> +			folio_get(rf->folio);
>   		}
>   
>   		rf->raid_bio = r1_bio;
> -		bio->bi_private = rf;
> +		r1_bio->bios[j]->bi_private = rf;
>   	}
>   
>   	r1_bio->master_bio = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 7533aeb23819..5c0975ec8809 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -183,19 +183,17 @@ static void * r10buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data)
>   		if (rbio)
>   			rf_repl = &rfs[nalloc + j];
>   
> -		bio = r10_bio->devs[j].bio;
> -
>   		if (!j || test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC,
>   				   &conf->mddev->recovery)) {
>   			if (resync_alloc_folio(rf, gfp_flags))
>   				goto out_free_folio;
>   		} else {
>   			memcpy(rf, &rfs[0], sizeof(*rf));
> -			resync_get_folio(rf);
> +			folio_get(rf->folio);
>   		}
>   
>   		rf->raid_bio = r10_bio;
> -		bio->bi_private = rf;
> +		r10_bio->devs[j].bio->bi_private = rf;
>   		if (rbio) {
>   			memcpy(rf_repl, rf, sizeof(*rf));
>   			rbio->bi_private = rf_repl;

-- 
Thansk,
Kuai

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-04 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-28  7:56 [PATCH v2 00/14] folio support for sync I/O in RAID linan666
2026-01-28  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] md/raid1,raid10: clean up of RESYNC_SECTORS linan666
2026-02-04 16:29   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] md: introduce sync_folio_io for folio support in RAID linan666
2026-02-04 16:38   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] md/raid1: use folio for tmppage linan666
2026-02-04 16:45   ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-05  7:23     ` Li Nan
2026-02-05  7:33       ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-06  9:07         ` Li Nan
2026-01-28  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] md/raid10: " linan666
2026-01-28  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] md/raid1,raid10: use folio for sync path IO linan666
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] md: Clean up folio sync support related code linan666
2026-02-04 16:52   ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2026-02-05  7:27     ` Li Nan
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] md/raid1: clean up useless sync_blocks handling in raid1_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] md/raid1: fix IO error at logical block size granularity linan666
2026-02-04 16:54   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] md/raid10: " linan666
2026-02-04 16:55   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] md/raid1,raid10: clean up resync_fetch_folio linan666
2026-02-04 16:57   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] md: clean up resync_free_folio linan666
2026-02-04 16:59   ` Yu Kuai
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] md/raid1: clean up sync IO size calculation in raid1_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] md/raid10: clean up sync IO size calculation in raid10_sync_request linan666
2026-01-28  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] md/raid1,raid10: fall back to smaller order if sync folio alloc fails linan666
2026-02-04 16:48   ` Yu Kuai
2026-02-05  7:29     ` Li Nan
2026-02-04 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] folio support for sync I/O in RAID Yu Kuai
2026-02-05 12:57   ` Li Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b8ba3a3-ce7e-4fd0-aacb-3ea62876acc8@fnnas.com \
    --to=yukuai@fnnas.com \
    --cc=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox