* [PATCH 0 of 4] MD RAID10: Improve redundancy of RAID10 'far' and 'offset' algorithms
@ 2012-12-17 18:33 Jonathan Brassow
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jonathan Brassow @ 2012-12-17 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid; +Cc: neilb, agk, jbrassow
Neil,
I've changed the way 'far' and 'offset' algorithms are done to reflect
your latest suggestions. The case where there were a non-multiple of
'far_copies' devices in the array was the tricky issue we were dealing
with. I've separated my patch into two - one dealing with the
multiple-of-far_copies case and the other dealing with the non-multiple
case.
I had to make some adjustments to the dm-raid patch that includes the
new 'far' and 'offset' algorithms and I've included that revised patch
in this set.
[PATCH 1 of 4]MD RAID10: Minor non-functional code changes
[PATCH 2 of 4]MD RAID10: Improve redundancy for 'far' and 'offset' algorithms (part 1)
[PATCH 3 of 4]MD RAID10: Improve redundancy for 'far' and 'offset' algorithms (part 2)
[PATCH 4 of 4]DM RAID: Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithms
Thanks,
brassow
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-12-17 18:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-17 18:33 [PATCH 0 of 4] MD RAID10: Improve redundancy of RAID10 'far' and 'offset' algorithms Jonathan Brassow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox