From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 4/5] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queuing for later.
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:19:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147969118362.5434.13577701135211525699.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147969099621.5434.12384452255155063186.stgit@noble>
We gather bios that need to be returned into a bio_list
and call bio_endio() on them all together.
The original reason for this was to avoid making the calls while
holding a spinlock.
Locking has changed a lot since then, and that reason is no longer
valid.
So discard return_io() and various return_bi lists, and just call
bio_endio() directly as needed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 36 +++++++++---------------------------
drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index e53b8f499a4c..6f3154c80fbf 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -223,17 +223,6 @@ static int raid6_idx_to_slot(int idx, struct stripe_head *sh,
return slot;
}
-static void return_io(struct bio_list *return_bi)
-{
- struct bio *bi;
- while ((bi = bio_list_pop(return_bi)) != NULL) {
- bi->bi_iter.bi_size = 0;
- trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev),
- bi, 0);
- bio_endio(bi);
- }
-}
-
static void print_raid5_conf (struct r5conf *conf);
static int stripe_operations_active(struct stripe_head *sh)
@@ -1178,7 +1167,6 @@ async_copy_data(int frombio, struct bio *bio, struct page **page,
static void ops_complete_biofill(void *stripe_head_ref)
{
struct stripe_head *sh = stripe_head_ref;
- struct bio_list return_bi = BIO_EMPTY_LIST;
int i;
pr_debug("%s: stripe %llu\n", __func__,
@@ -1203,15 +1191,13 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *stripe_head_ref)
dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
rbi2 = r5_next_bio(rbi, dev->sector);
if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(rbi))
- bio_list_add(&return_bi, rbi);
+ bio_endio(rbi);
rbi = rbi2;
}
}
}
clear_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state);
- return_io(&return_bi);
-
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
}
@@ -3075,8 +3061,7 @@ static void stripe_set_idx(sector_t stripe, struct r5conf *conf, int previous,
static void
handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
- struct stripe_head_state *s, int disks,
- struct bio_list *return_bi)
+ struct stripe_head_state *s, int disks)
{
int i;
BUG_ON(sh->batch_head);
@@ -3124,7 +3109,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_list_add(return_bi, bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = nextbi;
}
if (bitmap_end)
@@ -3147,7 +3132,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_list_add(return_bi, bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = bi2;
}
@@ -3173,7 +3158,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_list_add(return_bi, bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = nextbi;
}
}
@@ -3457,7 +3442,7 @@ static void break_stripe_batch_list(struct stripe_head *head_sh,
* never LOCKED, so we don't need to test 'failed' directly.
*/
static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
- struct stripe_head *sh, int disks, struct bio_list *return_bi)
+ struct stripe_head *sh, int disks)
{
int i;
struct r5dev *dev;
@@ -3491,7 +3476,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
wbi2 = r5_next_bio(wbi, dev->sector);
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(wbi))
- bio_list_add(return_bi, wbi);
+ bio_endio(wbi);
wbi = wbi2;
}
bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
@@ -4378,7 +4363,7 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
sh->reconstruct_state = 0;
break_stripe_batch_list(sh, 0);
if (s.to_read+s.to_write+s.written)
- handle_failed_stripe(conf, sh, &s, disks, &s.return_bi);
+ handle_failed_stripe(conf, sh, &s, disks);
if (s.syncing + s.replacing)
handle_failed_sync(conf, sh, &s);
}
@@ -4443,7 +4428,7 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
&& !test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &qdev->flags)
&& (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &qdev->flags) ||
test_bit(R5_Discard, &qdev->flags))))))
- handle_stripe_clean_event(conf, sh, disks, &s.return_bi);
+ handle_stripe_clean_event(conf, sh, disks);
/* Now we might consider reading some blocks, either to check/generate
* parity, or to satisfy requests
@@ -4633,9 +4618,6 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
}
- if (!bio_list_empty(&s.return_bi))
- return_io(&s.return_bi);
-
clear_bit_unlock(STRIPE_ACTIVE, &sh->state);
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index f654f8207a44..799f84b26838 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ struct stripe_head_state {
int dec_preread_active;
unsigned long ops_request;
- struct bio_list return_bi;
struct md_rdev *blocked_rdev;
int handle_bad_blocks;
int log_failed;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-21 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 1:19 [md PATCH 0/5] Stop using bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 1/5] md: optimize md_write_start() slightly NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 2/5] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 3/5] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2016-11-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 6/5] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2016-11-21 14:01 ` [md PATCH 0/5] Stop using bi_phys_segments as a counter Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-21 23:43 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 0:25 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-22 1:02 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 2:19 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-22 8:01 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 2:08 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-23 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-24 0:31 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-06 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06 21:41 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147969118362.5434.13577701135211525699.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox