From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:19:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147969118374.5434.16171178480587828937.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147969099621.5434.12384452255155063186.stgit@noble>
md/raid5 needs to keep track of how many stripe_heads are processing a
bio so that it can delay calling bio_endio() until all stripe_heads
have completed. It currently uses 16 bits of ->bi_phys_segments for
this purpose.
16 bits is only enough for 256M requests, and it is possible for a
single bio to be larger than this, which causes problems. Also, the
bio struct contains a larger counter, __bi_remaining, which has a
purpose very similar to the purpose of our counter. So stop using
->bi_phys_segments, and instead use __bi_remaining.
This means we don't need to initialize the counter, as our caller
initializes it to '1'. It also means we can call bio_endio() directly
as it tests this counter internally.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 68 +++++++++++-----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 6f3154c80fbf..7169420bfde5 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -154,18 +154,6 @@ static inline int raid5_bi_processed_stripes(struct bio *bio)
return (atomic_read(segments) >> 16) & 0xffff;
}
-static inline int raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(struct bio *bio)
-{
- atomic_t *segments = (atomic_t *)&bio->bi_phys_segments;
- return atomic_sub_return(1, segments) & 0xffff;
-}
-
-static inline void raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(struct bio *bio)
-{
- atomic_t *segments = (atomic_t *)&bio->bi_phys_segments;
- atomic_inc(segments);
-}
-
static inline void raid5_set_bi_processed_stripes(struct bio *bio,
unsigned int cnt)
{
@@ -178,12 +166,6 @@ static inline void raid5_set_bi_processed_stripes(struct bio *bio,
} while (atomic_cmpxchg(segments, old, new) != old);
}
-static inline void raid5_set_bi_stripes(struct bio *bio, unsigned int cnt)
-{
- atomic_t *segments = (atomic_t *)&bio->bi_phys_segments;
- atomic_set(segments, cnt);
-}
-
/* Find first data disk in a raid6 stripe */
static inline int raid6_d0(struct stripe_head *sh)
{
@@ -1190,8 +1172,7 @@ static void ops_complete_biofill(void *stripe_head_ref)
while (rbi && rbi->bi_iter.bi_sector <
dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
rbi2 = r5_next_bio(rbi, dev->sector);
- if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(rbi))
- bio_endio(rbi);
+ bio_endio(rbi);
rbi = rbi2;
}
}
@@ -2983,7 +2964,7 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi, int dd_idx,
if (*bip)
bi->bi_next = *bip;
*bip = bi;
- raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(bi);
+ bio_inc_remaining(bi);
md_write_start(conf->mddev, bi);
if (forwrite) {
@@ -3108,8 +3089,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
- if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_endio(bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = nextbi;
}
if (bitmap_end)
@@ -3131,8 +3111,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
- if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_endio(bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = bi2;
}
@@ -3157,8 +3136,7 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
r5_next_bio(bi, sh->dev[i].sector);
bi->bi_error = -EIO;
- if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
- bio_endio(bi);
+ bio_endio(bi);
bi = nextbi;
}
}
@@ -3475,8 +3453,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
wbi2 = r5_next_bio(wbi, dev->sector);
md_write_end(conf->mddev);
- if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(wbi))
- bio_endio(wbi);
+ bio_endio(wbi);
wbi = wbi2;
}
bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
@@ -4719,7 +4696,7 @@ static struct bio *remove_bio_from_retry(struct r5conf *conf)
* this sets the active strip count to 1 and the processed
* strip count to zero (upper 8 bits)
*/
- raid5_set_bi_stripes(bi, 1); /* biased count of active stripes */
+ raid5_set_bi_processed_stripes(bi, 0);
}
return bi;
@@ -5036,7 +5013,6 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
sector_t logical_sector, last_sector;
struct stripe_head *sh;
- int remaining;
int stripe_sectors;
if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector)
@@ -5047,7 +5023,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
last_sector = bi->bi_iter.bi_sector + (bi->bi_iter.bi_size>>9);
bi->bi_next = NULL;
- bi->bi_phys_segments = 1; /* over-loaded to count active stripes */
+ bi->bi_phys_segments = 0;
stripe_sectors = conf->chunk_sectors *
(conf->raid_disks - conf->max_degraded);
@@ -5093,7 +5069,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
continue;
sh->dev[d].towrite = bi;
set_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &sh->dev[d].flags);
- raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(bi);
+ bio_inc_remaining(bi);
sh->overwrite_disks++;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
@@ -5117,10 +5093,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
}
md_write_end(mddev);
- remaining = raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi);
- if (remaining == 0) {
- bio_endio(bi);
- }
+ bio_endio(bi);
}
static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
@@ -5131,7 +5104,6 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
sector_t logical_sector, last_sector;
struct stripe_head *sh;
const int rw = bio_data_dir(bi);
- int remaining;
DEFINE_WAIT(w);
bool do_prepare;
@@ -5167,7 +5139,7 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
logical_sector = bi->bi_iter.bi_sector & ~((sector_t)STRIPE_SECTORS-1);
last_sector = bio_end_sector(bi);
bi->bi_next = NULL;
- bi->bi_phys_segments = 1; /* over-loaded to count active stripes */
+ bi->bi_phys_segments = 0;
md_write_start(mddev, bi);
prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -5299,14 +5271,7 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
if (rw == WRITE)
md_write_end(mddev);
- remaining = raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi);
- if (remaining == 0) {
-
-
- trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev),
- bi, 0);
- bio_endio(bi);
- }
+ bio_endio(bi);
}
static sector_t raid5_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sectors, int raid_disks);
@@ -5671,7 +5636,6 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
int dd_idx;
sector_t sector, logical_sector, last_sector;
int scnt = 0;
- int remaining;
int handled = 0;
logical_sector = raid_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector &
@@ -5710,12 +5674,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
handled++;
}
- remaining = raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(raid_bio);
- if (remaining == 0) {
- trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(raid_bio->bi_bdev),
- raid_bio, 0);
- bio_endio(raid_bio);
- }
+ bio_endio(raid_bio);
+
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->active_aligned_reads))
wake_up(&conf->wait_for_quiescent);
return handled;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-21 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 1:19 [md PATCH 0/5] Stop using bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 4/5] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queuing for later NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 3/5] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 1/5] md: optimize md_write_start() slightly NeilBrown
2016-11-21 1:19 ` [md PATCH 2/5] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2016-11-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 6/5] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2016-11-21 14:01 ` [md PATCH 0/5] Stop using bi_phys_segments as a counter Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-21 23:43 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 0:25 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-22 1:02 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-22 2:19 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-22 8:01 ` Shaohua Li
2016-11-23 2:08 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-23 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-24 0:31 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-06 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06 21:41 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147969118374.5434.16171178480587828937.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox