* Re: SLES, not large enough to join array
[not found] ` <f3c8d0240807311309i4005357aib7a10584cf741fe6@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-08-01 5:16 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2008-08-01 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Diego Ramos; +Cc: linux-raid
On Thursday July 31, leituras@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a setup with SLES 10 SP2 installed in 1 DELL PowerEdge 2950 attached
> to 5 DELL MD1000 SAS storages (5 TB each).
>
> I used mdadm to make a single RAID unit of my storages. I'm using RAID 5 to
> prevent data loss if one of the storages fail.
>
> I had a storage fail. I removed the faulty storage (mdadm /dev/md0 -r
> /dev/sdb1) and restarted the system to replace this storage with a good one.
>
>
> The new storage is an exact copy of the faulty one (including internal
> HD's).
>
> When I tried to add the new storage to my degraded array ( mdadm /dev/md0 -a
> /dev/sdX1), I get the following message: /dev/sdX: not large enough to join
> array.
>
> I used the same steps in another site (with the same storages, but with only
> 500 GB each) and it worked all right.
>
> Any suggestions?
Yes. Upgrade :-)
This looks like the bug that was fixed in SLES10-SP2 by an update on
May 9th this year.
The relevant bugzilla is
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368704
There is a patch linked in there.
If you cannot find an upgrade, you could just compile your own mdadm
from the latest source.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-08-01 5:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <f3c8d0240807311308k7085724ardf6769d772e00fdc@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <f3c8d0240807311309i4005357aib7a10584cf741fe6@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-01 5:16 ` SLES, not large enough to join array Neil Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox