* [Small Patch] for raidlib.c in raidtools-1.00.3
@ 2003-02-25 13:49 Florian Schanda
2003-02-25 14:31 ` Stephen Lee
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Schanda @ 2003-02-25 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]
Hi all,
I had some problems with raidtools, it gave me a wierd error saying
"/dev/md/0: Invalid argument"
After spending some time to fix it, I figured it would be a good idea to
actually load the kernel module. ;)
To save save some trouble, I enhaced the error reporting for that particular
function.
- Florian Schanda
[-- Attachment #2: error-reporting.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1036 bytes --]
--- raidlib.c.orig Tue Feb 25 13:38:46 2003
+++ raidlib.c Tue Feb 25 13:44:44 2003
@@ -149,20 +149,26 @@
return 0;
}
- if ((rc = ioctl (fd, RUN_ARRAY, (unsigned long)param))) {
- save_errno=errno;
- switch (save_errno) {
- case EBUSY:
- fprintf(stderr,"%s: already running\n",dev);
- break;
- /* fall through */
- default:
- perror (dev);
- }
- errno=save_errno;
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
+ if ((rc = ioctl (fd, RUN_ARRAY, (unsigned long)param))) {
+ save_errno=errno;
+ switch (save_errno) {
+ case EBUSY:
+ fprintf(stderr,"%s: already running\n", dev);
+ break;
+ case EINVAL:
+ fprintf(stderr, "Error: EINVAL\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "Request or argp is not valid.\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "Are you *SURE* you compiled raid into the kernel, and loaded it?\n");
+ break;
+ /* fall through */
+ default:
+ perror (dev);
+ }
+ errno=save_errno;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static int do_mdstart (int fd, char *dev, dev_t rdev) {
int rc;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Small Patch] for raidlib.c in raidtools-1.00.3
2003-02-25 13:49 [Small Patch] for raidlib.c in raidtools-1.00.3 Florian Schanda
@ 2003-02-25 14:31 ` Stephen Lee
2003-02-25 18:04 ` Florian Schanda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Lee @ 2003-02-25 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Florian Schanda said:
> Hi all,
>
> I had some problems with raidtools, it gave me a wierd
> error saying
>
> "/dev/md/0: Invalid argument"
>
Shouldn't that be /dev/md0?
Stephen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Small Patch] for raidlib.c in raidtools-1.00.3
2003-02-25 14:31 ` Stephen Lee
@ 2003-02-25 18:04 ` Florian Schanda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Schanda @ 2003-02-25 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: splee, linux-raid
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 14:31, Stephen Lee wrote:
> Shouldn't that be /dev/md0?
Not if you're using devfs.
- Florian Schanda
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-25 18:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-25 13:49 [Small Patch] for raidlib.c in raidtools-1.00.3 Florian Schanda
2003-02-25 14:31 ` Stephen Lee
2003-02-25 18:04 ` Florian Schanda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox