* Status of Linux MD RAID 10? (Or: Why is it still marked experimental?)
@ 2010-04-22 11:17 Eric MSP Veith
2010-05-03 3:18 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric MSP Veith @ 2010-04-22 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello list,
I'm using Linux' MD feature with two RAID 1 arrays and am pretty happy with it.
Since I'm planning to change my disk layout, I'd like to switch to RAID level
10. But when configuring current 2.6.33 stable kernel, I found RAID 10 marked
experimental.
Why is this that case?
I normally do not tend to ignore the "EXPERIMENTAL" warning; in fact, my
current "home server" kernel does not include any single item marked as
experimental.
I've googled around before bugging the ML and found several others asking
questions along the line "can I use MD RAID 10 right now?", with answers like
"it works for me so far." I, on the contrary, would like to know what issues
prevent RAID 10 from getting the "experimental" KConfig tag removed.
TIA!
Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvQMF4ACgkQhS0drJ3goJIOwQCffOtkGCs57p5dyYu6pcQdgpyp
KcsAn0MRkm9ShMFNwGKgAY4fe2hFuB0c
=08wl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Status of Linux MD RAID 10? (Or: Why is it still marked experimental?)
2010-04-22 11:17 Status of Linux MD RAID 10? (Or: Why is it still marked experimental?) Eric MSP Veith
@ 2010-05-03 3:18 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2010-05-03 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric MSP Veith; +Cc: linux-raid
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:17:51 +0000
Eric MSP Veith <eveith@wwweb-library.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello list,
>
> I'm using Linux' MD feature with two RAID 1 arrays and am pretty happy with it.
> Since I'm planning to change my disk layout, I'd like to switch to RAID level
> 10. But when configuring current 2.6.33 stable kernel, I found RAID 10 marked
> experimental.
>
> Why is this that case?
I just never got around to removing it.
I will submit a patch for 2.6.35 to remove the EXPERIMENTAL designation (it
is too late to bother for 2.6.34).
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> I normally do not tend to ignore the "EXPERIMENTAL" warning; in fact, my
> current "home server" kernel does not include any single item marked as
> experimental.
>
> I've googled around before bugging the ML and found several others asking
> questions along the line "can I use MD RAID 10 right now?", with answers like
> "it works for me so far." I, on the contrary, would like to know what issues
> prevent RAID 10 from getting the "experimental" KConfig tag removed.
>
> TIA!
>
> Eric
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvQMF4ACgkQhS0drJ3goJIOwQCffOtkGCs57p5dyYu6pcQdgpyp
> KcsAn0MRkm9ShMFNwGKgAY4fe2hFuB0c
> =08wl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-03 3:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-22 11:17 Status of Linux MD RAID 10? (Or: Why is it still marked experimental?) Eric MSP Veith
2010-05-03 3:18 ` Neil Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox