* Odd CPU usage in the last stage of a raid5 reshape
@ 2013-04-19 7:54 Goswin von Brederlow
2013-04-21 22:28 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Goswin von Brederlow @ 2013-04-19 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi,
I'm still reshaping a 2 disk raid5 to 3 disks. It has now progressed
past the 50% mark so all data has been reshaped. So now the kernel
simply writes zeroes (I assume) to all 3 disks. There are no more
reads, only writes.
Now what is odd is the cpu usage:
/proc/mdsata:
md0 : active raid5 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sda1[0]
3907015168 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
[============>........] reshape = 62.0% (2425537964/3907015168) finish=22
0.0min speed=112230K/sec
iostat -k 10:
Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
sda 834.40 0.00 103372.60 0 1033726
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
sdc 813.90 0.00 104601.80 0 1046018
sdd 718.50 0.00 104499.40 0 1044994
top:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2058 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 96 0.0 1106:40 md0_raid5
18379 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 50 0.0 324:11.19 md0_reshape
Is the kernel zero filling the raid device and computing the XOR of
zeroes for the parity blocks? Wouldn't it be less cpu consuming to
insert zero filled stripes directly into the stripe cache?
MfG
Goswin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Odd CPU usage in the last stage of a raid5 reshape
2013-04-19 7:54 Odd CPU usage in the last stage of a raid5 reshape Goswin von Brederlow
@ 2013-04-21 22:28 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2013-04-21 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Goswin von Brederlow; +Cc: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1643 bytes --]
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:54:04 +0200 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still reshaping a 2 disk raid5 to 3 disks. It has now progressed
> past the 50% mark so all data has been reshaped. So now the kernel
> simply writes zeroes (I assume) to all 3 disks. There are no more
> reads, only writes.
>
> Now what is odd is the cpu usage:
>
> /proc/mdsata:
> md0 : active raid5 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sda1[0]
> 3907015168 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
> [============>........] reshape = 62.0% (2425537964/3907015168) finish=22
> 0.0min speed=112230K/sec
>
> iostat -k 10:
> Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
> sda 834.40 0.00 103372.60 0 1033726
> md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
> sdc 813.90 0.00 104601.80 0 1046018
> sdd 718.50 0.00 104499.40 0 1044994
>
> top:
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 2058 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 96 0.0 1106:40 md0_raid5
> 18379 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 50 0.0 324:11.19 md0_reshape
>
> Is the kernel zero filling the raid device and computing the XOR of
> zeroes for the parity blocks? Wouldn't it be less cpu consuming to
> insert zero filled stripes directly into the stripe cache?
>
Yes, the kernel is computing an XOR of the zeros to determine the parity
block. This certainly could be optimised, but it is hardly a priority.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-21 22:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-19 7:54 Odd CPU usage in the last stage of a raid5 reshape Goswin von Brederlow
2013-04-21 22:28 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox