Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* How to fix this superblock?
@ 2014-06-16  1:29 Pete
  2014-06-16  1:48 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pete @ 2014-06-16  1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Hi all. Please excuse, newbie here, finding out how much I don't know
about md.

I have a RAID1 array which is running in degraded mode. When I try to
re-add the device that used to be part of the array, I'm told that it's
too small, though it used to be fine.

/proc/mdstat:

md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2]
      2920305508 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [_U]

When I try to re-add the device that used to be part of the array, mdadm
says it's not large enough:

# mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: /dev/sdb3 not large enough to join array

The partition tables hadn't changed when this started. Since then I've
re-partitioned sdb to make sdb3 a few GB bigger, but it's still not
large enough.

Looking at the working device's superblock, there's a heap of "failed"
so I'm guessing that superblock has been damaged:

# mdadm -E /dev/sdc3

/dev/sdc3:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 1.0
    Feature Map : 0x0
     Array UUID : 129ec25f:f07e292a:5bf0829d:19793e6c
           Name : pioneer:1  (local to host pioneer)
  Creation Time : Thu Nov 21 21:19:12 2013
     Raid Level : raid1
   Raid Devices : 2

  Used Dev Size : 5841405976 (2785.40 GiB 2990.80 GB)
     Array Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
      Used Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
   Super Offset : 5841406232 sectors
          State : clean
    Device UUID : 6bbc382c:244cf1ad:4fd61c87:4e40e592

    Update Time : Fri Jun 13 17:05:57 2014
       Checksum : 93cf5353 - correct
         Events : 444384

    Array Slot : 2 (failed, failed, 1, failed, failed, failed, failed,
failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
 [snip]
failed) Array State : _U 383 failed


Could it be that whatever happened to the superblock on sdc3 is giving
it an incorrect idea of the array size? Is that something I can fix?

Would I be better off creating a new array on sdb3+missing and copying
data to that? Then I would zero the superblock on sdc3 and hopefully
add it to the new array.

Would appreciate any help.

Thanks.  Pete

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: How to fix this superblock?
  2014-06-16  1:29 How to fix this superblock? Pete
@ 2014-06-16  1:48 ` NeilBrown
  2014-06-16  2:24   ` Pete
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2014-06-16  1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pete; +Cc: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2652 bytes --]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:27 +0930 Pete <psid@riverland.net.au> wrote:

> Hi all. Please excuse, newbie here, finding out how much I don't know
> about md.
> 
> I have a RAID1 array which is running in degraded mode. When I try to
> re-add the device that used to be part of the array, I'm told that it's
> too small, though it used to be fine.
> 
> /proc/mdstat:
> 
> md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2]
>       2920305508 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [_U]
> 
> When I try to re-add the device that used to be part of the array, mdadm
> says it's not large enough:
> 
> # mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
> mdadm: /dev/sdb3 not large enough to join array
> 
> The partition tables hadn't changed when this started. Since then I've
> re-partitioned sdb to make sdb3 a few GB bigger, but it's still not
> large enough.
> 
> Looking at the working device's superblock, there's a heap of "failed"
> so I'm guessing that superblock has been damaged:
> 
> # mdadm -E /dev/sdc3
> 
> /dev/sdc3:
>           Magic : a92b4efc
>         Version : 1.0
>     Feature Map : 0x0
>      Array UUID : 129ec25f:f07e292a:5bf0829d:19793e6c
>            Name : pioneer:1  (local to host pioneer)
>   Creation Time : Thu Nov 21 21:19:12 2013
>      Raid Level : raid1
>    Raid Devices : 2
> 
>   Used Dev Size : 5841405976 (2785.40 GiB 2990.80 GB)
>      Array Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
>       Used Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
>    Super Offset : 5841406232 sectors
>           State : clean
>     Device UUID : 6bbc382c:244cf1ad:4fd61c87:4e40e592
> 
>     Update Time : Fri Jun 13 17:05:57 2014
>        Checksum : 93cf5353 - correct
>          Events : 444384
> 
>     Array Slot : 2 (failed, failed, 1, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
>  [snip]
> failed) Array State : _U 383 failed
> 
> 
> Could it be that whatever happened to the superblock on sdc3 is giving
> it an incorrect idea of the array size? Is that something I can fix?
> 
> Would I be better off creating a new array on sdb3+missing and copying
> data to that? Then I would zero the superblock on sdc3 and hopefully
> add it to the new array.
> 
> Would appreciate any help.

I suspect that upgrading to a newer mdadm would solve most of these problems.
What are you running? (mdadm -V)
Try:

  cd /tmp
  git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
  cd mdadm
  make
  ./mdadm ......

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: How to fix this superblock?
  2014-06-16  1:48 ` NeilBrown
@ 2014-06-16  2:24   ` Pete
  2014-07-15 11:58     ` Pete
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pete @ 2014-06-16  2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NeilBrown; +Cc: linux-raid

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:48:29 +1000
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:27 +0930 Pete <psid@riverland.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all. Please excuse, newbie here, finding out how much I don't know
> > about md.
> > 
> > I have a RAID1 array which is running in degraded mode. When I try to
> > re-add the device that used to be part of the array, I'm told that it's
> > too small, though it used to be fine.
> > 
> > /proc/mdstat:
> > 
> > md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2]
> >       2920305508 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [_U]
> > 
> > When I try to re-add the device that used to be part of the array, mdadm
> > says it's not large enough:
> > 
> > # mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
> > mdadm: /dev/sdb3 not large enough to join array
> > 
> > The partition tables hadn't changed when this started. Since then I've
> > re-partitioned sdb to make sdb3 a few GB bigger, but it's still not
> > large enough.
> > 
> > Looking at the working device's superblock, there's a heap of "failed"
> > so I'm guessing that superblock has been damaged:
> > 
> > # mdadm -E /dev/sdc3
> > 
> > /dev/sdc3:
> >           Magic : a92b4efc
> >         Version : 1.0
> >     Feature Map : 0x0
> >      Array UUID : 129ec25f:f07e292a:5bf0829d:19793e6c
> >            Name : pioneer:1  (local to host pioneer)
> >   Creation Time : Thu Nov 21 21:19:12 2013
> >      Raid Level : raid1
> >    Raid Devices : 2
> > 
> >   Used Dev Size : 5841405976 (2785.40 GiB 2990.80 GB)
> >      Array Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
> >       Used Size : 5840611016 (2785.02 GiB 2990.39 GB)
> >    Super Offset : 5841406232 sectors
> >           State : clean
> >     Device UUID : 6bbc382c:244cf1ad:4fd61c87:4e40e592
> > 
> >     Update Time : Fri Jun 13 17:05:57 2014
> >        Checksum : 93cf5353 - correct
> >          Events : 444384
> > 
> >     Array Slot : 2 (failed, failed, 1, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> > failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> > failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> > failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, failed,
> >  [snip]
> > failed) Array State : _U 383 failed
> > 
> > 
> > Could it be that whatever happened to the superblock on sdc3 is giving
> > it an incorrect idea of the array size? Is that something I can fix?
> > 
> > Would I be better off creating a new array on sdb3+missing and copying
> > data to that? Then I would zero the superblock on sdc3 and hopefully
> > add it to the new array.
> > 
> > Would appreciate any help.
> 
> I suspect that upgrading to a newer mdadm would solve most of these problems.
> What are you running? (mdadm -V)
> Try:
> 
>   cd /tmp
>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
>   cd mdadm
>   make
>   ./mdadm ......
> 
> NeilBrown

Thanks Neil. It's several years old, Ubuntu 8.04:
mdadm - v2.6.3 - 20th August 2007

The server doesn't have git and I can't apt-get it since 8.04 is beyond
support. I will try booting a live CD on it when I get a chance.

I'd like to install a newer system, but it's used for production so
that will take some planning.

Regards.  Pete

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: How to fix this superblock?
  2014-06-16  2:24   ` Pete
@ 2014-07-15 11:58     ` Pete
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pete @ 2014-07-15 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:54:36 +0930
Pete <psid@riverland.net.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:48:29 +1000
> NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:27 +0930 Pete <psid@riverland.net.au> wrote:

> > > When I try to re-add the device that used to be part of the array, mdadm
> > > says it's not large enough:
> > > 
> > > # mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdb3
> > > mdadm: /dev/sdb3 not large enough to join array
> > > 
> > > The partition tables hadn't changed when this started. Since then I've
> > > re-partitioned sdb to make sdb3 a few GB bigger, but it's still not
> > > large enough.
> > > 
> > > Looking at the working device's superblock, there's a heap of "failed"
..
> > I suspect that upgrading to a newer mdadm would solve most of these problems.

I booted a debian7 live CD. parted wouldn't read the partition table on
sdb so I re-partitioned sdb. Then mdadm was able to --add sdb3. Rebooted
to the old ubuntu - all looking good now.

Thanks for your help.  Pete


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-15 11:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-16  1:29 How to fix this superblock? Pete
2014-06-16  1:48 ` NeilBrown
2014-06-16  2:24   ` Pete
2014-07-15 11:58     ` Pete

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox