From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
To: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm raid: fix compat_features validation
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:38:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161011153808.nmyf6hafjaadcemw@brain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c517f14-1234-7844-fc6a-cd1b9698fb8b@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> good catch.
>
> We should rather check for V190 support only in case any
> compat feature flags are actually set.
>
> {
> + if (le32_to_cpu(sb->compat_features) &&
> + le32_to_cpu(sb->compat_features) != FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190)
> {
> rs->ti->error = "Unable to assemble array: Unknown flag(s)
> in compatible feature flags";
> return -EINVAL;
> }
If the feature flags are single bit combinations then I believe the
below does check exactly that. Checking for no 1s outside of the
expected features, caring not for the value of the valid bits:
+ if (le32_to_cpu(sb->compat_features) & ~(FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190)) {
with the possibilty to or in additional feature bits as they are added.
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-11 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-11 14:28 [PATCH 1/1] dm raid: fix compat_features validation Andy Whitcroft
2016-10-11 15:04 ` [dm-devel] " Heinz Mauelshagen
2016-10-11 15:38 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2016-10-11 15:44 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2016-10-11 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/1 V2] " Andy Whitcroft
2016-10-11 16:53 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2016-10-11 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Mike Snitzer
2016-10-14 17:14 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161011153808.nmyf6hafjaadcemw@brain \
--to=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox