From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raid5-ppl: PPL support for disks with write-back cache enabled
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:30:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171221193038.7i7cds7ddygsbw5q@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513604700-1826-1-git-send-email-tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Tomasz Majchrzak wrote:
> In order to provide data consistency with PPL for disks with write-back
> cache enabled all data has to be flushed to disks before next PPL
> entry.
>
> With write-back cache disabled next PPL entry is submitted when data write
> for current one completes. Data flush defers next log submission so trigger
> it when there are no stripes for handling found.
>
> As PPL assures all data is flushed to disk at request completion, just
> acknowledge flush request when PPL is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/md/raid5-ppl.txt | 4 -
> drivers/md/md.c | 5 +-
> drivers/md/md.h | 1 +
> drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 5 --
> drivers/md/raid5-log.h | 29 +++++++
> drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 +-
> 7 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/md/raid5-ppl.txt b/Documentation/md/raid5-ppl.txt
> index 127072b..2df5cb1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/md/raid5-ppl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/md/raid5-ppl.txt
> @@ -38,7 +38,3 @@ case the behavior is the same as in plain raid5.
>
> PPL is available for md version-1 metadata and external (specifically IMSM)
> metadata arrays. It can be enabled using mdadm option --consistency-policy=ppl.
> -
> -Currently, volatile write-back cache should be disabled on all member drives
> -when using PPL. Otherwise it cannot guarantee consistency in case of power
> -failure.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index a71adb3..1b5c9af2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static struct md_rdev *find_rdev(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct md_rdev *find_rdev_rcu(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev)
> +struct md_rdev *md_find_rdev_rcu(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev)
> {
> struct md_rdev *rdev;
>
> @@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ static struct md_rdev *find_rdev_rcu(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev)
>
> return NULL;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_find_rdev_rcu);
>
> static struct md_personality *find_pers(int level, char *clevel)
> {
> @@ -7010,7 +7011,7 @@ static int set_disk_faulty(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - rdev = find_rdev_rcu(mddev, dev);
> + rdev = md_find_rdev_rcu(mddev, dev);
> if (!rdev)
> err = -ENODEV;
> else {
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index be8f72a..58cd20a 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -710,6 +710,7 @@ extern struct bio *bio_alloc_mddev(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs,
> extern void md_update_sb(struct mddev *mddev, int force);
> extern void md_kick_rdev_from_array(struct md_rdev * rdev);
> struct md_rdev *md_find_rdev_nr_rcu(struct mddev *mddev, int nr);
> +struct md_rdev *md_find_rdev_rcu(struct mddev *mddev, dev_t dev);
>
> static inline void rdev_dec_pending(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> index f259a5f..3b1f3d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
> @@ -1111,9 +1111,6 @@ void r5l_write_stripe_run(struct r5l_log *log)
>
> int r5l_handle_flush_request(struct r5l_log *log, struct bio *bio)
> {
> - if (!log)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> if (log->r5c_journal_mode == R5C_JOURNAL_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH) {
> /*
> * in write through (journal only)
> @@ -1592,8 +1589,6 @@ void r5l_wake_reclaim(struct r5l_log *log, sector_t space)
> void r5l_quiesce(struct r5l_log *log, int quiesce)
> {
> struct mddev *mddev;
> - if (!log)
> - return;
>
> if (quiesce) {
> /* make sure r5l_write_super_and_discard_space exits */
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-log.h b/drivers/md/raid5-log.h
> index 3860041..d5b3965 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-log.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-log.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ extern void r5c_update_on_rdev_error(struct mddev *mddev,
> extern void ppl_write_stripe_run(struct r5conf *conf);
> extern void ppl_stripe_write_finished(struct stripe_head *sh);
> extern int ppl_modify_log(struct r5conf *conf, struct md_rdev *rdev, bool add);
> +extern void ppl_quiesce(struct r5conf *conf, int quiesce);
>
> static inline bool raid5_has_ppl(struct r5conf *conf)
> {
> @@ -88,6 +89,34 @@ static inline void log_write_stripe_run(struct r5conf *conf)
> ppl_write_stripe_run(conf);
> }
>
> +static inline void log_flush_stripe_to_raid(struct r5conf *conf)
> +{
> + if (conf->log)
> + r5l_flush_stripe_to_raid(conf->log);
> + else if (raid5_has_ppl(conf))
> + ppl_write_stripe_run(conf);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int log_handle_flush_request(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + int ret = -ENODEV;
make ret = 0, and you can delete the ppl branch below
> +
> + if (conf->log)
> + ret = r5l_handle_flush_request(conf->log, bio);
> + else if (raid5_has_ppl(conf))
> + ret = 0;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void log_quiesce(struct r5conf *conf, int quiesce)
> +{
> + if (conf->log)
> + r5l_quiesce(conf->log, quiesce);
> + else if (raid5_has_ppl(conf))
> + ppl_quiesce(conf, quiesce);
> +}
> +
> static inline void log_exit(struct r5conf *conf)
> {
> if (conf->log)
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
> index 628c0bf..50fc2ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
> * (for a single member disk). New io_units are added to the end of the list
> * and the first io_unit is submitted, if it is not submitted already.
> * The current io_unit accepting new stripes is always at the end of the list.
> + *
> + * If write-back cache is enabled for any of the disks in the array, its data
> + * must be flushed before next io_unit is submitted.
> */
>
> #define PPL_SPACE_SIZE (128 * 1024)
> @@ -104,6 +107,7 @@ struct ppl_conf {
> struct kmem_cache *io_kc;
> mempool_t *io_pool;
> struct bio_set *bs;
> + struct bio_set *flush_bs;
>
> /* used only for recovery */
> int recovered_entries;
> @@ -128,6 +132,8 @@ struct ppl_log {
> sector_t next_io_sector;
> unsigned int entry_space;
> bool use_multippl;
> + bool wb_cache_on;
> + unsigned long disk_flush_bitmap;
> };
>
> #define PPL_IO_INLINE_BVECS 32
> @@ -145,6 +151,7 @@ struct ppl_io_unit {
>
> struct list_head stripe_list; /* stripes added to the io_unit */
> atomic_t pending_stripes; /* how many stripes not written to raid */
> + atomic_t pending_flushes; /* how many disk flushes are in progress */
>
> bool submitted; /* true if write to log started */
>
> @@ -249,6 +256,7 @@ static struct ppl_io_unit *ppl_new_iounit(struct ppl_log *log,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io->log_sibling);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io->stripe_list);
> atomic_set(&io->pending_stripes, 0);
> + atomic_set(&io->pending_flushes, 0);
> bio_init(&io->bio, io->biovec, PPL_IO_INLINE_BVECS);
>
> pplhdr = page_address(io->header_page);
> @@ -475,7 +483,18 @@ static void ppl_submit_iounit(struct ppl_io_unit *io)
> if (log->use_multippl)
> log->next_io_sector += (PPL_HEADER_SIZE + io->pp_size) >> 9;
>
> + WARN_ON(log->disk_flush_bitmap != 0);
> +
> list_for_each_entry(sh, &io->stripe_list, log_list) {
> + for (i = 0; i < sh->disks; i++) {
> + struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
> +
> + if ((ppl_conf->child_logs[i].wb_cache_on) &&
> + (test_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &dev->flags))) {
> + set_bit(i, &log->disk_flush_bitmap);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* entries for full stripe writes have no partial parity */
> if (test_bit(STRIPE_FULL_WRITE, &sh->state))
> continue;
> @@ -540,6 +559,7 @@ static void ppl_io_unit_finished(struct ppl_io_unit *io)
> {
> struct ppl_log *log = io->log;
> struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf = log->ppl_conf;
> + struct r5conf *conf = ppl_conf->mddev->private;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> pr_debug("%s: seq: %llu\n", __func__, io->seq);
> @@ -565,6 +585,111 @@ static void ppl_io_unit_finished(struct ppl_io_unit *io)
> spin_unlock(&ppl_conf->no_mem_stripes_lock);
>
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + wake_up(&conf->wait_for_quiescent);
> +}
> +
> +static void ppl_flush_endio(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + struct ppl_io_unit *io = bio->bi_private;
> + struct ppl_log *log = io->log;
> + struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf = log->ppl_conf;
> + struct r5conf *conf = ppl_conf->mddev->private;
> + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: dev: %s\n", __func__, bio_devname(bio, b));
> +
> + if (bio->bi_status) {
> + struct md_rdev *rdev;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + rdev = md_find_rdev_rcu(conf->mddev, bio_dev(bio));
> + if (rdev)
> + md_error(rdev->mddev, rdev);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
Why check the rdev here? I think we already take a refcount in write path for
stripe handling, so the rdev doesn't disappear.
> + }
> +
> + bio_put(bio);
> +
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&io->pending_flushes)) {
> + ppl_io_unit_finished(io);
> + md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void ppl_do_flush(struct ppl_io_unit *io)
> +{
> + struct ppl_log *log = io->log;
> + struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf = log->ppl_conf;
> + struct r5conf *conf = ppl_conf->mddev->private;
> + int raid_disks = conf->raid_disks;
> + int flushed_disks = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + atomic_set(&io->pending_flushes, raid_disks);
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &log->disk_flush_bitmap, raid_disks) {
can you add comments explaining why accessing disk_flush_bitmap is safe without
lock?
> + struct md_rdev *rdev;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->disks[i].rdev);
> + if (rdev && test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> + rdev = NULL;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (rdev) {
Same here. And if we don't take a refcount, this code isn't safe too, because
the rdev can disappear after the rcu lock.
> + struct bio *bio;
> + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> +
> + bio = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOIO, 0, ppl_conf->flush_bs);
> + bio_set_dev(bio, rdev->bdev);
> + bio->bi_private = io;
> + bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH;
> + bio->bi_end_io = ppl_flush_endio;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: dev: %s\n", __func__,
> + bio_devname(bio, b));
> +
> + submit_bio(bio);
> + flushed_disks++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + log->disk_flush_bitmap = 0;
> +
> + for (i = flushed_disks ; i < raid_disks; i++) {
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&io->pending_flushes))
> + ppl_io_unit_finished(io);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool ppl_no_io_unit_submitted(struct r5conf *conf,
> + struct ppl_log *log)
> +{
> + struct ppl_io_unit *io;
> +
> + io = list_first_entry_or_null(&log->io_list, struct ppl_io_unit,
> + log_sibling);
> +
> + return !io || !io->submitted;
> +}
> +
> +void ppl_quiesce(struct r5conf *conf, int quiesce)
> +{
> + struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf = conf->log_private;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (quiesce) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ppl_conf->count; i++) {
> + struct ppl_log *log = &ppl_conf->child_logs[i];
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
> + wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_quiescent,
> + ppl_no_io_unit_submitted(conf, log),
> + log->io_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> void ppl_stripe_write_finished(struct stripe_head *sh)
> @@ -574,8 +699,12 @@ void ppl_stripe_write_finished(struct stripe_head *sh)
> io = sh->ppl_io;
> sh->ppl_io = NULL;
>
> - if (io && atomic_dec_and_test(&io->pending_stripes))
> - ppl_io_unit_finished(io);
> + if (io && atomic_dec_and_test(&io->pending_stripes)) {
> + if (io->log->disk_flush_bitmap)
> + ppl_do_flush(io);
> + else
> + ppl_io_unit_finished(io);
> + }
> }
>
> static void ppl_xor(int size, struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
> @@ -1108,6 +1237,8 @@ static void __ppl_exit_log(struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf)
>
> if (ppl_conf->bs)
> bioset_free(ppl_conf->bs);
> + if (ppl_conf->flush_bs)
> + bioset_free(ppl_conf->flush_bs);
> mempool_destroy(ppl_conf->io_pool);
> kmem_cache_destroy(ppl_conf->io_kc);
>
> @@ -1173,6 +1304,8 @@ static int ppl_validate_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>
> static void ppl_init_child_log(struct ppl_log *log, struct md_rdev *rdev)
> {
> + struct request_queue *q;
> +
> if ((rdev->ppl.size << 9) >= (PPL_SPACE_SIZE +
> PPL_HEADER_SIZE) * 2) {
> log->use_multippl = true;
> @@ -1185,6 +1318,10 @@ static void ppl_init_child_log(struct ppl_log *log, struct md_rdev *rdev)
> PPL_HEADER_SIZE;
> }
> log->next_io_sector = rdev->ppl.sector;
> +
> + q = bdev_get_queue(rdev->bdev);
> + if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_WC, &q->queue_flags))
> + log->wb_cache_on = true;
> }
>
> int ppl_init_log(struct r5conf *conf)
> @@ -1192,8 +1329,8 @@ int ppl_init_log(struct r5conf *conf)
> struct ppl_conf *ppl_conf;
> struct mddev *mddev = conf->mddev;
> int ret = 0;
> + int max_disks;
> int i;
> - bool need_cache_flush = false;
>
> pr_debug("md/raid:%s: enabling distributed Partial Parity Log\n",
> mdname(conf->mddev));
> @@ -1219,6 +1356,14 @@ int ppl_init_log(struct r5conf *conf)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + max_disks = FIELD_SIZEOF(struct ppl_log, disk_flush_bitmap) *
> + BITS_PER_BYTE;
> + if (conf->raid_disks > max_disks) {
> + pr_warn("md/raid:%s PPL doesn't support over %d disks in the array\n",
> + mdname(mddev), max_disks);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This looks like an unnecessary limitation, can we just use bitmap API?
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 13:45 [PATCH] raid5-ppl: PPL support for disks with write-back cache enabled Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-12-20 16:35 ` kbuild test robot
2017-12-21 9:19 ` Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-12-21 19:30 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-12-22 11:06 ` Tomasz Majchrzak
2017-12-22 18:09 ` Shaohua Li
2017-12-27 9:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Tomasz Majchrzak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171221193038.7i7cds7ddygsbw5q@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox