From: Blazej Kucman <blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com>
To: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>
Cc: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, <xni@redhat.com>,
<ncroxon@redhat.com>, <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
<liubo254@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mdadm: Clear extra flags when initializing metadata
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310154159.00007ea6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27127b7d-7da6-cd31-01db-6725884a7286@huawei.com>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:09:36 +0800
Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
you are only adding a change to native metadata so it would be good to
emphasize this in the title, please change "mdadm:" to "super1:"
There are also a few checkpatch issues,
> When adding a disk to a RAID1 array, the metadata is read from the
> existing member disks for sync. However, only the bad_blocks flag are
> copied, the bad_blocks records are not copied, so the bad_blocks
> records are all zeros. The kernel function super_1_load() detects
> bad_blocks flag and reads the bad_blocks record, then sets the bad
> block using badblocks_set().
WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit
description?) #8:
the bad_blocks records are not copied, so the bad_blocks records are
all zeros.
>
> After the kernel commit 1726c7746("badblocks: improve badblocks_set()
> for multiple ranges handling"), if the length of a bad_blocks record
please use SHA-1 ID - first 12 characters and space between ID and
(Tile)
> is 0, it will return a failure. Therefore the device addition will
> fail.
>
> So when adding a new disk, some flags cannot be sync and need to be
> cleared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2:
> Add a testcase.
> Clear extra replace flag.
> ---
> super1.c | 4 ++++
> tests/05r1-add-badblocks | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/05r1-add-badblocks
>
> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
> index fe3c4c64..f4a29f4f 100644
> --- a/super1.c
> +++ b/super1.c
> @@ -1971,6 +1971,10 @@ static int write_init_super1(struct supertype
> *st) long bm_offset;
> bool raid0_need_layout = false;
>
> + /* Clear extra flags */
> + sb->feature_map &= ~__cpu_to_le32(MD_FEATURE_BAD_BLOCKS |
> + MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#36: FILE: super1.c:1976:
+ MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);$
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#36: FILE: super1.c:1976:
+ MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);$
However, in this case the code will fit on one line, the limit is 100
characters.
> +
> /* Since linux kernel v5.4, raid0 always has a layout */
> if (has_raid0_layout(sb) && get_linux_version() >= 5004000)
> raid0_need_layout = true;
> diff --git a/tests/05r1-add-badblocks b/tests/05r1-add-badblocks
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..88b064f2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/05r1-add-badblocks
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +#
> +# create a raid1 with a drive and set badblocks for the drive.
> +# add a new drive does not cause an error.
> +#
> +
> +# create raid1
> +mdadm -CR $md0 -l1 -n2 -e1.0 $dev1 missing
> +testdev $md0 1 $mdsize1a 64
> +sleep 3
> +
> +# set badblocks for the drive
> +dev1_name=$(basename $dev1)
> +echo "10000 100" > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-$dev1_name/bad_blocks
> +echo "write_error" > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-$dev1_name/state
> +
> +# maybe fail but that's ok, as it's only intended to
> +# record the bad block in the metadata.
> +mkfs.ext3 $md0
> +
> +# re-add and recovery
> +mdadm $md0 -a $dev2
> +check recovery
> +
> +mdadm -S $md0
> +
Since you added the test, would you be able to issue a PR on github
to get the tests running?
Thansk,
Blazej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b894d081-eda9-6b28-5fef-75753838a916@huawei.com>
2025-03-10 11:09 ` [PATCH v2] mdadm: Clear extra flags when initializing metadata Wu Guanghao
2025-03-10 14:41 ` Blazej Kucman [this message]
2025-03-11 1:10 ` Xiao Ni
2025-03-11 2:08 ` Wu Guanghao
2025-03-11 2:28 ` Xiao Ni
2025-03-11 2:23 ` Wu Guanghao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310154159.00007ea6@linux.intel.com \
--to=blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liubo254@huawei.com \
--cc=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ncroxon@redhat.com \
--cc=wuguanghao3@huawei.com \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox