From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: Blazej Kucman <blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>,
Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
ncroxon@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
liubo254@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mdadm: Clear extra flags when initializing metadata
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:10:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALTww29ouYDA0VeVFpGo1PUSaj2jPeFyu8WbFbOUtsU5ffYHvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310154159.00007ea6@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:42 PM Blazej Kucman
<blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:09:36 +0800
> Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> you are only adding a change to native metadata so it would be good to
> emphasize this in the title, please change "mdadm:" to "super1:"
>
> There are also a few checkpatch issues,
>
>
> > When adding a disk to a RAID1 array, the metadata is read from the
> > existing member disks for sync. However, only the bad_blocks flag are
> > copied, the bad_blocks records are not copied, so the bad_blocks
> > records are all zeros. The kernel function super_1_load() detects
> > bad_blocks flag and reads the bad_blocks record, then sets the bad
> > block using badblocks_set().
>
> WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit
> description?) #8:
> the bad_blocks records are not copied, so the bad_blocks records are
> all zeros.
>
> >
> > After the kernel commit 1726c7746("badblocks: improve badblocks_set()
> > for multiple ranges handling"), if the length of a bad_blocks record
>
> please use SHA-1 ID - first 12 characters and space between ID and
> (Tile)
>
> > is 0, it will return a failure. Therefore the device addition will
> > fail.
> >
> > So when adding a new disk, some flags cannot be sync and need to be
> > cleared.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v2:
> > Add a testcase.
> > Clear extra replace flag.
> > ---
> > super1.c | 4 ++++
> > tests/05r1-add-badblocks | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tests/05r1-add-badblocks
> >
> > diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
> > index fe3c4c64..f4a29f4f 100644
> > --- a/super1.c
> > +++ b/super1.c
> > @@ -1971,6 +1971,10 @@ static int write_init_super1(struct supertype
> > *st) long bm_offset;
> > bool raid0_need_layout = false;
> >
> > + /* Clear extra flags */
> > + sb->feature_map &= ~__cpu_to_le32(MD_FEATURE_BAD_BLOCKS |
> > + MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);
>
> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> #36: FILE: super1.c:1976:
> + MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);$
>
> WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
> #36: FILE: super1.c:1976:
> + MD_FEATURE_REPLACEMENT);$
>
> However, in this case the code will fit on one line, the limit is 100
> characters.
>
> > +
> > /* Since linux kernel v5.4, raid0 always has a layout */
> > if (has_raid0_layout(sb) && get_linux_version() >= 5004000)
> > raid0_need_layout = true;
> > diff --git a/tests/05r1-add-badblocks b/tests/05r1-add-badblocks
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..88b064f2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/05r1-add-badblocks
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +#
> > +# create a raid1 with a drive and set badblocks for the drive.
> > +# add a new drive does not cause an error.
> > +#
> > +
> > +# create raid1
> > +mdadm -CR $md0 -l1 -n2 -e1.0 $dev1 missing
> > +testdev $md0 1 $mdsize1a 64
> > +sleep 3
> > +
> > +# set badblocks for the drive
> > +dev1_name=$(basename $dev1)
> > +echo "10000 100" > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-$dev1_name/bad_blocks
> > +echo "write_error" > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-$dev1_name/state
> > +
> > +# maybe fail but that's ok, as it's only intended to
> > +# record the bad block in the metadata.
> > +mkfs.ext3 $md0
> > +
> > +# re-add and recovery
> > +mdadm $md0 -a $dev2
> > +check recovery
> > +
> > +mdadm -S $md0
> > +
>
> Since you added the test, would you be able to issue a PR on github
> to get the tests running?
Hi all
I've been fixing the test failures recently and I'll create a PR for
this patch set. So you can create a PR tomorrow. If you are not
familiar with this, I can help.
Regards
Xiao
>
> Thansk,
> Blazej
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b894d081-eda9-6b28-5fef-75753838a916@huawei.com>
2025-03-10 11:09 ` [PATCH v2] mdadm: Clear extra flags when initializing metadata Wu Guanghao
2025-03-10 14:41 ` Blazej Kucman
2025-03-11 1:10 ` Xiao Ni [this message]
2025-03-11 2:08 ` Wu Guanghao
2025-03-11 2:28 ` Xiao Ni
2025-03-11 2:23 ` Wu Guanghao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALTww29ouYDA0VeVFpGo1PUSaj2jPeFyu8WbFbOUtsU5ffYHvw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liubo254@huawei.com \
--cc=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ncroxon@redhat.com \
--cc=wuguanghao3@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox