* [PATCH 0/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped ios for writemostly device @ 2026-02-06 5:38 Xiao Ni 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree Xiao Ni 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk Xiao Ni 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-06 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 Xiao Ni (2): md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree md/raid1: serialize overlap io for writemostly disk drivers/md/md.c | 1 - drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- drivers/md/raid1.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree 2026-02-06 5:38 [PATCH 0/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped ios for writemostly device Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-06 5:38 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:18 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk Xiao Ni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-06 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 Interval tree uses [start, end] as a region which stores in the tree. In raid1, it uses the wrong end value. For example: bio(A,B) is too big and needs to be split to bio1(A,C-1), bio2(C,B). The region of bio1 is [A,C] and the region of bio2 is [C,B]. So bio1 and bio2 overlap which is not right. Fix this problem by using right end value of the region. Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> --- drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c index 867db18bc3ba..a41b1ec3d695 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; - sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors; + sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void raid1_end_write_request(struct bio *bio) int mirror = find_bio_disk(r1_bio, bio); struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[mirror].rdev; sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; - sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors; + sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors - 1; bool ignore_error = !raid1_should_handle_error(bio) || (bio->bi_status && bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:18 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 2:35 ` Xiao Ni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiao Ni; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666, yukuai Hi, 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > Interval tree uses [start, end] as a region which stores in the tree. > In raid1, it uses the wrong end value. For example: > bio(A,B) is too big and needs to be split to bio1(A,C-1), bio2(C,B). > The region of bio1 is [A,C] and the region of bio2 is [C,B]. So bio1 and > bio2 overlap which is not right. > > Fix this problem by using right end value of the region. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Perhaps also add a fix tag, with this: Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > index 867db18bc3ba..a41b1ec3d695 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > unsigned long flags; > int ret = 0; > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > - sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors; > + sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void raid1_end_write_request(struct bio *bio) > int mirror = find_bio_disk(r1_bio, bio); > struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[mirror].rdev; > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > - sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors; > + sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > bool ignore_error = !raid1_should_handle_error(bio) || > (bio->bi_status && bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD); > -- Thansk, Kuai ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree 2026-02-11 2:18 ` Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 2:35 ` Xiao Ni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:19 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > > Interval tree uses [start, end] as a region which stores in the tree. > > In raid1, it uses the wrong end value. For example: > > bio(A,B) is too big and needs to be split to bio1(A,C-1), bio2(C,B). > > The region of bio1 is [A,C] and the region of bio2 is [C,B]. So bio1 and > > bio2 overlap which is not right. > > > > Fix this problem by using right end value of the region. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Perhaps also add a fix tag, with this: Thanks for the suggestion. I'll add it and send V2 > > Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > index 867db18bc3ba..a41b1ec3d695 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > > unsigned long flags; > > int ret = 0; > > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > > - sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors; > > + sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > > struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > > @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void raid1_end_write_request(struct bio *bio) > > int mirror = find_bio_disk(r1_bio, bio); > > struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[mirror].rdev; > > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > > - sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors; > > + sector_t hi = r1_bio->sector + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > > bool ignore_error = !raid1_should_handle_error(bio) || > > (bio->bi_status && bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD); > > > > -- > Thansk, > Kuai > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-06 5:38 [PATCH 0/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped ios for writemostly device Xiao Ni 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-06 5:38 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:31 ` Yu Kuai 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-06 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. For example bio1(100,200) bio2(150,200) bio3(150,300) The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> --- drivers/md/md.c | 1 - drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md.c +++ b/drivers/md/md.c @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); } rdev->serial = serial; diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md.h +++ b/drivers/md/md.h @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { struct serial_in_rdev { struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; spinlock_t serial_lock; - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; }; /* @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ + struct list_head list_node; + struct list_head waiters; + struct completion ready; }; /* diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, - struct serial_info *si, int idx) + struct serial_info *si) { unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; + struct serial_info *head_si; spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); /* collision happened */ - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); + if (head_si && head_si != si) { + si->start = lo; + si->last = hi; + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); ret = -EBUSY; - else { + } else if (!head_si) { si->start = lo; si->last = hi; raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) { struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; struct serial_info *si; - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) return; si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); + init_completion(&si->ready); + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); + reinit_completion(&si->ready); + } } static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) { struct serial_info *si; + struct serial_info *first_si; unsigned long flags; int found = 0; struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); found = 1; break; } } if (!found) WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); + else { + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, + struct serial_info, list_node); + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); + complete(&first_si->ready); + } + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); + } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); } /* -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:31 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 2:44 ` Xiao Ni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiao Ni; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666, yukuai Hi, 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They > In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree > need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree > bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio > which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. > > For example > bio1(100,200) > bio2(150,200) > bio3(150,300) > The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write > sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. > Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. To be honest, I think this is fine with the respect user won't send overlap bios. In this case, bio1 is done in fast disk and pending in slow disk, then bio2 will stuck while issuing and waiting for bio1 to return from slow disk. So send bio3 in this case is not expected, and if you do you can't guarantee the complete order from fast disk as bio2, bio3 as well. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/md/md.c | 1 - > drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- > drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/md.c > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) > > spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); > serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; > - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); > } > > rdev->serial = serial; > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h > index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/md.h > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h > @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { > struct serial_in_rdev { > struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; > spinlock_t serial_lock; > - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; > }; > > /* > @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { > sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ > sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ > sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ > + struct list_head list_node; > + struct list_head waiters; > + struct completion ready; > }; > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, > START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); > > static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > - struct serial_info *si, int idx) > + struct serial_info *si) > { > unsigned long flags; > int ret = 0; > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > + struct serial_info *head_si; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > /* collision happened */ > - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) > + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > + if (head_si && head_si != si) { > + si->start = lo; > + si->last = hi; > + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); > ret = -EBUSY; > - else { > + } else if (!head_si) { > si->start = lo; > si->last = hi; > raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); > @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) > { > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > struct serial_info *si; > - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) > return; > si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); > - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, > - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); > + init_completion(&si->ready); > + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { > + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); > + reinit_completion(&si->ready); > + } > } > > static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > { > struct serial_info *si; > + struct serial_info *first_si; > unsigned long flags; > int found = 0; > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { > if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { > - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > found = 1; > break; > } > } > if (!found) > WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); > + else { > + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { > + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, > + struct serial_info, list_node); > + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); > + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); > + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); > + complete(&first_si->ready); > + } > + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > + } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); > } > > /* -- Thansk, Kuai ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-11 2:31 ` Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 2:44 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:50 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 3:15 ` Yu Kuai 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > > In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They > > In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree > > need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree > > bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio > > which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. > > > > For example > > bio1(100,200) > > bio2(150,200) > > bio3(150,300) > > The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write > > sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. > > Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. > > To be honest, I think this is fine with the respect user won't send overlap > bios. In this case, bio1 is done in fast disk and pending in slow disk, then > bio2 will stuck while issuing and waiting for bio1 to return from slow disk. > So send bio3 in this case is not expected, and if you do you can't guarantee > the complete order from fast disk as bio2, bio3 as well. Hi Kuai In write behind mode, raid1 returns bio1 to the upper layer once the write on the fast disk finishes. The upper layer (app/filesystem) thinks that bio1 has finished, while the write of bio1 to the slow disk is still in progress. So bio2 will not be stuck while issuing, am I right? If so, bio2 can be submitted to raid1 once the write of bio1 to the fast disk finishes. And bio3 can be submitted to raid1 once the write of bio2 to fast disk finishes. Best Regards Xiao > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/md/md.c | 1 - > > drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > > index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/md.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > > @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) > > > > spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); > > serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; > > - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); > > } > > > > rdev->serial = serial; > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h > > index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/md.h > > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h > > @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { > > struct serial_in_rdev { > > struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; > > spinlock_t serial_lock; > > - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; > > }; > > > > /* > > @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { > > sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ > > sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ > > sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ > > + struct list_head list_node; > > + struct list_head waiters; > > + struct completion ready; > > }; > > > > /* > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, > > START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); > > > > static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > > - struct serial_info *si, int idx) > > + struct serial_info *si) > > { > > unsigned long flags; > > int ret = 0; > > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > > sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > > + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > > struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > + struct serial_info *head_si; > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > > /* collision happened */ > > - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) > > + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > > + if (head_si && head_si != si) { > > + si->start = lo; > > + si->last = hi; > > + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); > > ret = -EBUSY; > > - else { > > + } else if (!head_si) { > > si->start = lo; > > si->last = hi; > > raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) > > { > > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > > struct serial_info *si; > > - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > > - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > > > if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) > > return; > > si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); > > - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, > > - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); > > + init_completion(&si->ready); > > + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { > > + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); > > + reinit_completion(&si->ready); > > + } > > } > > > > static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > > { > > struct serial_info *si; > > + struct serial_info *first_si; > > unsigned long flags; > > int found = 0; > > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > > @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > > for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > > si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { > > if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { > > - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > > found = 1; > > break; > > } > > } > > if (!found) > > WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); > > + else { > > + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { > > + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, > > + struct serial_info, list_node); > > + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); > > + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); > > + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); > > + complete(&first_si->ready); > > + } > > + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > > + } > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > > - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); > > } > > > > /* > > -- > Thansk, > Kuai > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-11 2:44 ` Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:50 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 3:15 ` Yu Kuai 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:44 AM Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > > > In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They > > > In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree > > > need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree > > > bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio > > > which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. > > > > > > For example > > > bio1(100,200) > > > bio2(150,200) > > > bio3(150,300) > > > The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write > > > sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. > > > Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. > > > > To be honest, I think this is fine with the respect user won't send overlap > > bios. In this case, bio1 is done in fast disk and pending in slow disk, then > > bio2 will stuck while issuing and waiting for bio1 to return from slow disk. > > So send bio3 in this case is not expected, and if you do you can't guarantee > > the complete order from fast disk as bio2, bio3 as well. > > Hi Kuai > > In write behind mode, raid1 returns bio1 to the upper layer once the > write on the fast disk finishes. The upper layer (app/filesystem) > thinks that bio1 has finished, while the write of bio1 to the slow > disk is still in progress. So bio2 will not be stuck while issuing, am > I right? If so, bio2 can be submitted to raid1 once the write of bio1 > to the fast disk finishes. And bio3 can be submitted to raid1 once the > write of bio2 to fast disk finishes. By the way, it's reported by our customer, there is a data corruption by the following test script: #!/bin/sh disk1=/dev/loop0 disk2=/dev/loop1 mddev=/dev/md0 mount_md=/data-md mount_disk1=/data-1 mount_disk2=/data-2 bitmap=/root/bitmap test_prg=/root/test-serializewrite test_num=1000 test_str=abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz loop=0 touch MD-TEST while [ -f MD-TEST ]; do set -x loop=$((loop + 1)) echo "START LOOP=$loop at $(date)" echo "# lsblk" lsblk echo "# dmsetup" dmsetup create disk-500ms --table "0 $(blockdev --getsz $disk2) delay $disk2 0 500" sleep 2 echo "# mdadm" #mdadm --create $mddev --run --assume-clean --force --level=1 --write-behind=1024 --bitmap=$bitmap --raid-devices=2 $disk1 --write-mostly /dev/mapper/disk-500ms mdadm --create $mddev --run --assume-clean --force --level=1 --write-behind=1024 --bitmap=internal --raid-devices=2 $disk1 --write-mostly /dev/mapper/disk-500ms echo "# cat /proc/mdstat" cat /proc/mdstat #echo "# mdadm -X $bitmap" #mdadm -X $bitmap echo "# mkfs.xfs -f $mddev" mkfs.xfs -f $mddev echo "# mount $mddev $mount_md" mount $mddev $mount_md set +x echo "# $test_prg" for n in $(seq 1 $test_num); do $test_prg $mount_md/test.$n $test_str & done while true; do sleep 2 pgrep -f $(basename $test_prg) > /dev/null if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then break fi done set -x echo "# cat /proc/mdstat" cat /proc/mdstat #echo "# mdadm -X $bitmap" #mdadm -X $bitmap echo "# umount $mount_md" sleep 10 while true; do sleep 2 umount $mount_md if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then break fi done echo "# mdadm --stop $mddev" mdadm --stop $mddev echo "# dmsetup remove disk-500ms" while true; do dmsetup remove disk-500ms if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then sleep 5 else break fi done offset=$(mdadm --examine $disk1 | awk -F': ' '/Data Offset/ {print $2}' | awk '{print $1}') offset=$((offset * 512)) echo "# mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid $disk1 $mount_disk1" mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid $disk1 $mount_disk1 offset=$(mdadm --examine $disk2 | awk -F': ' '/Data Offset/ {print $2}' | awk '{print $1}') #offset=$(mdadm --examine /dev/mapper/disk-500ms | awk -F': ' '/Data Offset/ {print $2}' | awk '{print $1}') offset=$((offset * 512)) echo "# mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid $disk2 $mount_disk2" #echo "# mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid /dev/mapper/disk-500ms $mount_disk2" mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid $disk2 $mount_disk2 #mount -o ro,offset=$offset,nouuid /dev/mapper/disk-500ms $mount_disk2 echo "# diff -rq $mount_disk1 $mount_disk2" diff -rq $mount_disk1 $mount_disk2 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "@@@ PASS (loop=$loop)" else echo "@@@ FAIL (loop=$loop)" fi umount $mount_disk1 umount $mount_disk2 mdadm --zero-superblock $disk1 mdadm --zero-superblock $disk2 sleep 10 set +x done > > Best Regards > Xiao > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/md/md.c | 1 - > > > drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- > > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > > > index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/md/md.c > > > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > > > @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) > > > > > > spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); > > > serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; > > > - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); > > > } > > > > > > rdev->serial = serial; > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h > > > index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/md/md.h > > > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h > > > @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { > > > struct serial_in_rdev { > > > struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; > > > spinlock_t serial_lock; > > > - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; > > > }; > > > > > > /* > > > @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { > > > sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ > > > sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ > > > sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ > > > + struct list_head list_node; > > > + struct list_head waiters; > > > + struct completion ready; > > > }; > > > > > > /* > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > > index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > > > @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, > > > START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); > > > > > > static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > > > - struct serial_info *si, int idx) > > > + struct serial_info *si) > > > { > > > unsigned long flags; > > > int ret = 0; > > > sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > > > sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > > > + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > > > struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > > + struct serial_info *head_si; > > > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > > > /* collision happened */ > > > - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) > > > + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > > > + if (head_si && head_si != si) { > > > + si->start = lo; > > > + si->last = hi; > > > + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); > > > ret = -EBUSY; > > > - else { > > > + } else if (!head_si) { > > > si->start = lo; > > > si->last = hi; > > > raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > > @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) > > > { > > > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > > > struct serial_info *si; > > > - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > > > - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > > > > > > if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) > > > return; > > > si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); > > > - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, > > > - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); > > > + init_completion(&si->ready); > > > + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { > > > + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); > > > + reinit_completion(&si->ready); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > > > { > > > struct serial_info *si; > > > + struct serial_info *first_si; > > > unsigned long flags; > > > int found = 0; > > > struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > > > @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > > > for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > > > si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { > > > if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { > > > - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > > - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > > > found = 1; > > > break; > > > } > > > } > > > if (!found) > > > WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); > > > + else { > > > + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > > > + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { > > > + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, > > > + struct serial_info, list_node); > > > + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); > > > + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); > > > + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); > > > + complete(&first_si->ready); > > > + } > > > + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > > > + } > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > > > - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > > -- > > Thansk, > > Kuai > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-11 2:44 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:50 ` Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 3:15 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 3:26 ` Xiao Ni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiao Ni; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666, yukuai Hi, 在 2026/2/11 10:44, Xiao Ni 写道: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: >>> In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They >>> In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree >>> need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree >>> bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio >>> which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. >>> >>> For example >>> bio1(100,200) >>> bio2(150,200) >>> bio3(150,300) >>> The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write >>> sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. >>> Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. >> To be honest, I think this is fine with the respect user won't send overlap >> bios. In this case, bio1 is done in fast disk and pending in slow disk, then >> bio2 will stuck while issuing and waiting for bio1 to return from slow disk. >> So send bio3 in this case is not expected, and if you do you can't guarantee >> the complete order from fast disk as bio2, bio3 as well. > Hi Kuai > > In write behind mode, raid1 returns bio1 to the upper layer once the > write on the fast disk finishes. The upper layer (app/filesystem) > thinks that bio1 has finished, while the write of bio1 to the slow > disk is still in progress. So bio2 will not be stuck while issuing, am > I right? If so, bio2 can be submitted to raid1 once the write of bio1 > to the fast disk finishes. And bio3 can be submitted to raid1 once the > write of bio2 to fast disk finishes. I just take a look at raid1 code, turns out raid1_write_request() just allocate bio and issue it directly in each rdev iteration, I misunderstood. This solution looks fine to me, however, I'll suggest to keep the wait_queue and use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() to guarantee the fifo order. > > Best Regards > Xiao >>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/md/md.c | 1 - >>> drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- >>> drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c >>> index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c >>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c >>> @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) >>> >>> spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); >>> serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; >>> - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); >>> } >>> >>> rdev->serial = serial; >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h >>> index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/md/md.h >>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h >>> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { >>> struct serial_in_rdev { >>> struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; >>> spinlock_t serial_lock; >>> - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; >>> }; >>> >>> /* >>> @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { >>> sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ >>> sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ >>> sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ >>> + struct list_head list_node; >>> + struct list_head waiters; >>> + struct completion ready; >>> }; >>> >>> /* >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c >>> index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c >>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c >>> @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, >>> START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); >>> >>> static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, >>> - struct serial_info *si, int idx) >>> + struct serial_info *si) >>> { >>> unsigned long flags; >>> int ret = 0; >>> sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; >>> sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; >>> + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); >>> struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; >>> + struct serial_info *head_si; >>> >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); >>> /* collision happened */ >>> - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) >>> + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); >>> + if (head_si && head_si != si) { >>> + si->start = lo; >>> + si->last = hi; >>> + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); >>> ret = -EBUSY; >>> - else { >>> + } else if (!head_si) { >>> si->start = lo; >>> si->last = hi; >>> raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); >>> @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) >>> { >>> struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; >>> struct serial_info *si; >>> - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); >>> - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; >>> >>> if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) >>> return; >>> si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); >>> - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, >>> - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); >>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); >>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); >>> + init_completion(&si->ready); >>> + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { >>> + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); >>> + reinit_completion(&si->ready); >>> + } >>> } >>> >>> static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) >>> { >>> struct serial_info *si; >>> + struct serial_info *first_si; >>> unsigned long flags; >>> int found = 0; >>> struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; >>> @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) >>> for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); >>> si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { >>> if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { >>> - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); >>> - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); >>> found = 1; >>> break; >>> } >>> } >>> if (!found) >>> WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); >>> + else { >>> + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); >>> + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { >>> + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, >>> + struct serial_info, list_node); >>> + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); >>> + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); >>> + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); >>> + complete(&first_si->ready); >>> + } >>> + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); >>> + } >>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); >>> - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); >>> } >>> >>> /* >> -- >> Thansk, >> Kuai >> > -- Thansk, Kuai ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk 2026-02-11 3:15 ` Yu Kuai @ 2026-02-11 3:26 ` Xiao Ni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xiao Ni @ 2026-02-11 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yukuai; +Cc: song, linux-raid, linan666 On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:15 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > 在 2026/2/11 10:44, Xiao Ni 写道: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> 在 2026/2/6 13:38, Xiao Ni 写道: > >>> In behind mode, overlap bios for writemostly device are queued. They > >>> In behind mode, bios which overlap the bio from the interval tree > >>> need to wait in waitqueue. Those bios will be handled once the in-tree > >>> bio finishes. They are waken up and try to get the tree lock. The bio > >>> which gets the lock will be handled. So the sequence can't be guaranteed. > >>> > >>> For example > >>> bio1(100,200) > >>> bio2(150,200) > >>> bio3(150,300) > >>> The write sequence of fast device is bio1,bio2,bio3. But the write > >>> sequence of slow device is bio1,bio3,bio2. This causes data corruption. > >>> Replace waitqueue with a fifo list to guarantee the write sequence. > >> To be honest, I think this is fine with the respect user won't send overlap > >> bios. In this case, bio1 is done in fast disk and pending in slow disk, then > >> bio2 will stuck while issuing and waiting for bio1 to return from slow disk. > >> So send bio3 in this case is not expected, and if you do you can't guarantee > >> the complete order from fast disk as bio2, bio3 as well. > > Hi Kuai > > > > In write behind mode, raid1 returns bio1 to the upper layer once the > > write on the fast disk finishes. The upper layer (app/filesystem) > > thinks that bio1 has finished, while the write of bio1 to the slow > > disk is still in progress. So bio2 will not be stuck while issuing, am > > I right? If so, bio2 can be submitted to raid1 once the write of bio1 > > to the fast disk finishes. And bio3 can be submitted to raid1 once the > > write of bio2 to fast disk finishes. > > I just take a look at raid1 code, turns out raid1_write_request() just allocate > bio and issue it directly in each rdev iteration, I misunderstood. > > This solution looks fine to me, however, I'll suggest to keep the wait_queue and > use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() to guarantee the fifo order. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll use prepare_to_wait_exclusive and send v2. Best Regards Xiao > > > > > Best Regards > > Xiao > >>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/md/md.c | 1 - > >>> drivers/md/md.h | 4 +++- > >>> drivers/md/raid1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > >>> index 59cd303548de..ab91d17c2d68 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > >>> @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int rdev_init_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev) > >>> > >>> spin_lock_init(&serial_tmp->serial_lock); > >>> serial_tmp->serial_rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED; > >>> - init_waitqueue_head(&serial_tmp->serial_io_wait); > >>> } > >>> > >>> rdev->serial = serial; > >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h > >>> index ac84289664cd..64ffbb2efb87 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/md/md.h > >>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h > >>> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ enum sync_action { > >>> struct serial_in_rdev { > >>> struct rb_root_cached serial_rb; > >>> spinlock_t serial_lock; > >>> - wait_queue_head_t serial_io_wait; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> /* > >>> @@ -382,6 +381,9 @@ struct serial_info { > >>> sector_t start; /* start sector of rb node */ > >>> sector_t last; /* end sector of rb node */ > >>> sector_t _subtree_last; /* highest sector in subtree of rb node */ > >>> + struct list_head list_node; > >>> + struct list_head waiters; > >>> + struct completion ready; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> /* > >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > >>> index a41b1ec3d695..38c73538d038 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > >>> @@ -57,19 +57,25 @@ INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct serial_info, node, sector_t, _subtree_last, > >>> START, LAST, static inline, raid1_rb); > >>> > >>> static int check_and_add_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio, > >>> - struct serial_info *si, int idx) > >>> + struct serial_info *si) > >>> { > >>> unsigned long flags; > >>> int ret = 0; > >>> sector_t lo = r1_bio->sector; > >>> sector_t hi = lo + r1_bio->sectors - 1; > >>> + int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > >>> struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > >>> + struct serial_info *head_si; > >>> > >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > >>> /* collision happened */ > >>> - if (raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi)) > >>> + head_si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > >>> + if (head_si && head_si != si) { > >>> + si->start = lo; > >>> + si->last = hi; > >>> + list_add_tail(&si->list_node, &head_si->waiters); > >>> ret = -EBUSY; > >>> - else { > >>> + } else if (!head_si) { > >>> si->start = lo; > >>> si->last = hi; > >>> raid1_rb_insert(si, &serial->serial_rb); > >>> @@ -83,19 +89,23 @@ static void wait_for_serialization(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct r1bio *r1_bio) > >>> { > >>> struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > >>> struct serial_info *si; > >>> - int idx = sector_to_idx(r1_bio->sector); > >>> - struct serial_in_rdev *serial = &rdev->serial[idx]; > >>> > >>> if (WARN_ON(!mddev->serial_info_pool)) > >>> return; > >>> si = mempool_alloc(mddev->serial_info_pool, GFP_NOIO); > >>> - wait_event(serial->serial_io_wait, > >>> - check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si, idx) == 0); > >>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->waiters); > >>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->list_node); > >>> + init_completion(&si->ready); > >>> + while (check_and_add_serial(rdev, r1_bio, si)) { > >>> + wait_for_completion(&si->ready); > >>> + reinit_completion(&si->ready); > >>> + } > >>> } > >>> > >>> static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > >>> { > >>> struct serial_info *si; > >>> + struct serial_info *first_si; > >>> unsigned long flags; > >>> int found = 0; > >>> struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; > >>> @@ -106,16 +116,25 @@ static void remove_serial(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t lo, sector_t hi) > >>> for (si = raid1_rb_iter_first(&serial->serial_rb, lo, hi); > >>> si; si = raid1_rb_iter_next(si, lo, hi)) { > >>> if (si->start == lo && si->last == hi) { > >>> - raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > >>> - mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > >>> found = 1; > >>> break; > >>> } > >>> } > >>> if (!found) > >>> WARN(1, "The write IO is not recorded for serialization\n"); > >>> + else { > >>> + raid1_rb_remove(si, &serial->serial_rb); > >>> + if (!list_empty(&si->waiters)) { > >>> + first_si = list_first_entry(&si->waiters, > >>> + struct serial_info, list_node); > >>> + list_del_init(&first_si->list_node); > >>> + list_splice_init(&si->waiters, &first_si->waiters); > >>> + raid1_rb_insert(first_si, &serial->serial_rb); > >>> + complete(&first_si->ready); > >>> + } > >>> + mempool_free(si, mddev->serial_info_pool); > >>> + } > >>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial->serial_lock, flags); > >>> - wake_up(&serial->serial_io_wait); > >>> } > >>> > >>> /* > >> -- > >> Thansk, > >> Kuai > >> > > > -- > Thansk, > Kuai > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-11 3:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-02-06 5:38 [PATCH 0/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped ios for writemostly device Xiao Ni 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid1: fix the comparing region of interval tree Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:18 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 2:35 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-06 5:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid1: serialize overlapped io for writemostly disk Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:31 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 2:44 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 2:50 ` Xiao Ni 2026-02-11 3:15 ` Yu Kuai 2026-02-11 3:26 ` Xiao Ni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox