* [PATCH] md: skip redundant raid_disks update when value is unchanged
@ 2026-04-25 8:58 Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-04-28 8:25 ` Yu Kuai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi @ 2026-04-25 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: song, yukuai; +Cc: linux-raid, linux-kernel, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
Calling update_raid_disks() with the same value as the current one
can trigger unnecessary work. For example, RAID1 will reallocate
resources such as the mempool for r1bio.
Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
---
It returns -EINVAL for the same value. If silent success is preferred
instead, please let me know so I adjust its behavior.
---
drivers/md/md.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 0e55639211f2..cb66c4ebbafa 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -4409,9 +4409,12 @@ raid_disks_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
err = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
if (err)
return err;
- if (mddev->pers)
- err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
- else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
+ if (mddev->pers) {
+ if (n != mddev->raid_disks)
+ err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
+ else
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ } else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
struct md_rdev *rdev;
int olddisks = mddev->raid_disks - mddev->delta_disks;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] md: skip redundant raid_disks update when value is unchanged
2026-04-25 8:58 [PATCH] md: skip redundant raid_disks update when value is unchanged Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
@ 2026-04-28 8:25 ` Yu Kuai
2026-04-28 9:56 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2026-04-28 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi, song; +Cc: linux-raid, linux-kernel, yukuai
Hi,
在 2026/4/25 16:58, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi 写道:
> Calling update_raid_disks() with the same value as the current one
> can trigger unnecessary work. For example, RAID1 will reallocate
> resources such as the mempool for r1bio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
> ---
> It returns -EINVAL for the same value. If silent success is preferred
> instead, please let me know so I adjust its behavior.
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 0e55639211f2..cb66c4ebbafa 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -4409,9 +4409,12 @@ raid_disks_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
> err = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
> if (err)
> return err;
> - if (mddev->pers)
> - err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
> - else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
> + if (mddev->pers) {
> + if (n != mddev->raid_disks)
> + err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
> + else
> + err = -EINVAL;
Changing return value in this case is not expected, especially from
success to failure.
> + } else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
> struct md_rdev *rdev;
> int olddisks = mddev->raid_disks - mddev->delta_disks;
>
--
Thansk,
Kuai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] md: skip redundant raid_disks update when value is unchanged
2026-04-28 8:25 ` Yu Kuai
@ 2026-04-28 9:56 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi @ 2026-04-28 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai, song; +Cc: linux-raid, linux-kernel, yukuai
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 16:25 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2026/4/25 16:58, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi 写道:
>> Calling update_raid_disks() with the same value as the current one
>> can trigger unnecessary work. For example, RAID1 will reallocate
>> resources such as the mempool for r1bio.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> It returns -EINVAL for the same value. If silent success is preferred
>> instead, please let me know so I adjust its behavior.
>> ---
>> drivers/md/md.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>> index 0e55639211f2..cb66c4ebbafa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>> @@ -4409,9 +4409,12 @@ raid_disks_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
>> err = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> - if (mddev->pers)
>> - err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
>> - else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
>> + if (mddev->pers) {
>> + if (n != mddev->raid_disks)
>> + err = update_raid_disks(mddev, n);
>> + else
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>
> Changing return value in this case is not expected, especially from
> success to failure.
>
I’ll adjust the behavior to return success instead.
>> + } else if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector) {
>> struct md_rdev *rdev;
>> int olddisks = mddev->raid_disks - mddev->delta_disks;
>>
>
> --
> Thansk,
> Kuai
--
Best Regards,
Abd-Alrhman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-28 9:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-25 8:58 [PATCH] md: skip redundant raid_disks update when value is unchanged Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-04-28 8:25 ` Yu Kuai
2026-04-28 9:56 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox