From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:27:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26049689-238e-4f04-9a68-db002ed5c1e0@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0a82859-6c9e-43d4-b6ee-4b96fa193fa9@oracle.com>
On 11/6/24 11:49 PM, John Garry wrote:
> On 31/10/2024 09:59, John Garry wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Could you kindly consider picking up this series via the block tree?
>
> Please note that the raid 0/1/10 atomic write support in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20241101144616.497602-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com/ depends on this series, so maybe you would also be willing to pick that one up (when it's fully reviewed). Or create a branch with all the block changes, like which was done for the atomic writes XFS support.
The series doesn't apply to for-6.13/block - the 3rd patch for bio
splitting conflicts with:
commit b35243a447b9fe6457fa8e1352152b818436ba5a
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon Aug 26 19:37:54 2024 +0200
block: rework bio splitting
which was in long before for-6.13/block, which it's supposed to be based
on?
Please double check and resend a v4.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-31 9:59 [PATCH v3 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework John Garry
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] block: Rework bio_split() return value John Garry
2024-11-05 7:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-05 17:16 ` John Garry
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write in bio_split() John Garry
2024-11-05 7:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] block: Handle bio_split() errors in bio_submit_split() John Garry
2024-11-05 7:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] md/raid0: Handle bio_split() errors John Garry
2024-11-05 7:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] md/raid1: " John Garry
2024-10-31 11:07 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-05 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-31 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] md/raid10: " John Garry
2024-10-31 11:11 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-05 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-11-07 6:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework John Garry
2024-11-07 6:49 ` John Garry
2024-11-07 18:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-11-07 19:54 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26049689-238e-4f04-9a68-db002ed5c1e0@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox