* md multipath restart problem
@ 2005-06-10 22:07 John Madden
2005-06-12 16:31 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Madden @ 2005-06-10 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I'm connecting to an IBM 6800 SAN via two QLogic 2340's to a single LUN and I've
been wrestling with multipathing to them for about a week now. "Both" LUNs
are visible as two scsi devices, /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.
So I slap a Linux (0x83) partition on the device (and it is visible through
the "second" lun) and I create the md device:
# ./mdadm --create /dev/md0 --force --level=multipath --raid-disks=2 \
/.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 \
/.dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.
That can be formatted, mounted, written to, etc., all reliably. Info:
# dmesg
multipath: array md0 active with 2 out of 2 IO paths
# ./mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Fri Jun 10 16:07:16 2005
Raid Level : multipath
Array Size : 314568640 (299.100 GiB 322.12 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Fri Jun 10 16:07:16 2005
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : a917893d:4570204d:bcf77929:a2564bef
Events : 0.2
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 49 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 8 65 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
The config file, switched to devfs names since sda and sdb could move
around:
DEVICE /.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
/.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=multipath num-devices=2
UUID=a917893d:4570204d:bcf77929:a2564bef
devices=/.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1,/.dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/l
And then we reboot.
When the device is brought up the second time (and I don't think a reboot is
even needed), only one of the paths to the storage will be added, the other
failing with "Device or resource busy."
dmesg after boot:
md: md0 stopped.
md: bind<sdb1>
md: export_rdev(sda1)
multipath: array md0 active with 1 out of 2 IO paths
When I stop it manually, then re-activate it:
# ./mdadm -A /dev/md0
mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md0 has wrong state in superblock, but
/.dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 seems ok
mdadm: failed to add /.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 to /dev/md0:
Device or resource busy
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
So I'd guess that something's going wrong there but I have little idea what.
The bad part is that while troubleshooting this, I managed to make any
number of things go wrong, so I'm not even sure anymore if this is the root
of my problem, but it's where I am right now. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: md multipath restart problem
2005-06-10 22:07 John Madden
@ 2005-06-12 16:31 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Madden @ 2005-06-12 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
> When I stop it manually, then re-activate it:
>
> # ./mdadm -A /dev/md0
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md0 has wrong state in superblock, but
> /.dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 seems ok
> mdadm: failed to add /.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 to /dev/md0:
> Device or resource busy
> mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
FWIW, I found after more playing with it that rather than using -A, if I use
--build, I'm able to bring the raidset back up with both IO paths active. Is
there a bug in -A with it not unlocking the devices a it traverses them to bring
them into the array?
Thanks,
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: md multipath restart problem
@ 2005-06-20 14:34 Nagpure, Dinesh
2005-06-20 14:41 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nagpure, Dinesh @ 2005-06-20 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Madden, linux-raid
John,
Have you found a solution to the problem? If not then which kernel version are you using. The problem you are talking about seems like a bug in md that got fixed recently.
-dinesh
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of John Madden
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:31 PM
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: md multipath restart problem
> When I stop it manually, then re-activate it:
>
> # ./mdadm -A /dev/md0
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md0 has wrong state in superblock, but
> /.dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 seems ok
> mdadm: failed to add /.dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 to /dev/md0:
> Device or resource busy
> mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
FWIW, I found after more playing with it that rather than using -A, if I use
--build, I'm able to bring the raidset back up with both IO paths active. Is
there a bug in -A with it not unlocking the devices a it traverses them to bring
them into the array?
Thanks,
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: md multipath restart problem
2005-06-20 14:34 Nagpure, Dinesh
@ 2005-06-20 14:41 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Madden @ 2005-06-20 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nagpure, Dinesh; +Cc: linux-raid, Nagpure, Dinesh
> Have you found a solution to the problem? If not then which kernel version are you
> using. The problem you are talking about seems like a bug in md that got fixed
> recently.
And to think I was just about to give up and unsubscribe... :)
I did actually manage to fix the issue by just not doing things correctly -- if I
--build the array instead of starting it with -A, it works. (See my previous
posts.) I'm running kernel 2.6.11.8 so far, what version has a/the fix?
Thanks,
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: md multipath restart problem
@ 2005-06-20 16:01 Nagpure, Dinesh
2005-06-20 16:04 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nagpure, Dinesh @ 2005-06-20 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Madden; +Cc: linux-raid
John,
I encountered the bug using RHEL 4, fixed it and then found it already fixed in linux-2.6.12-rc2.
The bug is in the function super_90_load() in md.c where it checks sb->level against MULTIPATH which should be LEVEL_MULTIPATH as below:
rdev->preferred_minor = sb->md_minor;
rdev->data_offset = 0;
if (sb->level == LEVEL_MULTIPATH) /* THIS IS THE FIX - dinesh*/
rdev->desc_nr = -1;
else
rdev->desc_nr = sb->this_disk.number;
if (refdev == 0)
ret = 1;
BTW what version of mdadm are you using? just curious, can you fail and then re-insert a path to a multipath array and then dump the superblock information using mdadm to see both the paths active again? I think paths get activated but the superblock is not updated so the information mdadm dumps is sort of incorrect.
-dinesh
-----Original Message-----
From: John Madden [mailto:jmadden@ivytech.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:42 AM
To: Nagpure, Dinesh
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Nagpure, Dinesh
Subject: RE: md multipath restart problem
> Have you found a solution to the problem? If not then which kernel version are you
> using. The problem you are talking about seems like a bug in md that got fixed
> recently.
And to think I was just about to give up and unsubscribe... :)
I did actually manage to fix the issue by just not doing things correctly -- if I
--build the array instead of starting it with -A, it works. (See my previous
posts.) I'm running kernel 2.6.11.8 so far, what version has a/the fix?
Thanks,
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: md multipath restart problem
2005-06-20 16:01 md multipath restart problem Nagpure, Dinesh
@ 2005-06-20 16:04 ` John Madden
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Madden @ 2005-06-20 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nagpure, Dinesh; +Cc: linux-raid, Nagpure, Dinesh
> I encountered the bug using RHEL 4, fixed it and then found it already fixed in
> linux-2.6.12-rc2.
Interesting - I'll try upgrading.
> BTW what version of mdadm are you using? just curious, can you fail and then
> re-insert a path to a multipath array and then dump the superblock information
> using mdadm to see both the paths active again? I think paths get activated but
> the superblock is not updated so the information mdadm dumps is sort of incorrect.
I had tried the stock Ubuntu version (1.9.0) and then switched to 1.11. Failover
works, failback doesn't - the device has to be reinserted manually. Given the
email notification that mdadm sends out though, I can live with that.
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-20 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-20 16:01 md multipath restart problem Nagpure, Dinesh
2005-06-20 16:04 ` John Madden
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-20 14:34 Nagpure, Dinesh
2005-06-20 14:41 ` John Madden
2005-06-10 22:07 John Madden
2005-06-12 16:31 ` John Madden
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox