Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Neil F Brown <nfbrown@suse.com>,
	Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:45:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47eea35a-c932-66e6-159e-37936b8e60f6@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72C166DF-3984-4330-8C60-BBDA07358771@fb.com>

On 01/08/2019 19:43, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> [...]
>> Hi Song, thanks for the feedback! After changing the patch and testing a
>> bit, it behaves exactly as you said, we got either valid data read from
>> the healthy devices or -EIO for the data tentatively read from the
>> failed/missing array members.
> 
> Thanks for testing this out. 
> 
>>
>> So, I'll resubmit with that change. Also, I've noticed clearing the
>> BROKEN flag seem unnecessary, if user stops the array in order to fix
>> the missing member, it'll require a re-assembly and the array is gonna
>> work again.
>>
>> Do you / Neil considers this fix relevant to md/linear too? If so, I can
>> also include that in the V2.
> 
> Yes, please also include fix for md/linear. 
> 
> Song
> 

V2 just sent:
lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190816133441.29350-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com

Thanks,


Guilherme

      reply	other threads:[~2019-08-16 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-29 19:33 [PATCH] md/raid0: Fail BIOs if their underlying block device is gone Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-07-29 20:18 ` Roman Mamedov
2019-07-29 20:27   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-07-29 20:36     ` Roman Mamedov
2019-07-29 20:49       ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-07-29 21:14     ` Reindl Harald
2019-07-30  0:08 ` NeilBrown
2019-07-30 12:30   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-07-31 19:54     ` Song Liu
2019-07-31 19:56       ` Song Liu
2019-08-01 20:28         ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-01 22:43           ` Song Liu
2019-08-16 13:45             ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47eea35a-c932-66e6-159e-37936b8e60f6@canonical.com \
    --to=gpiccoli@canonical.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=nfbrown@suse.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox