From: "Patrik Dahlström" <risca@powerlamerz.org>
To: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Cc: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recover array after I panicked
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <727eeaf5-b856-305d-99b6-e42f3383b699@powerlamerz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424133946.GA7057@metamorpher.de>
On 04/24/2017 03:39 PM, Andreas Klauer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Patrik Dahlström wrote:
> Another thing you can check is, pick an arbitrary offset that does not
> have zeroes on the disks, and see if the XOR matches for 5, or 6 disks.
>
> It should match for 6 for however far the grow progressed,
> and match for 5 afterwards.
I got some success!
I started experimenting with this and realised that about 1 TB into
/dev/sdf, I started getting all zeros from the disk. Incidentally this
will also make the xor pass for both 5 and 6 disk arrays. Here's some
examples:
# for f in /dev/sd{a,b,d,c,e,f}; do hexdump -C -n 16 -s 0x8000000000 "$f"; done
8000000000 96 6c 5d 2c a4 03 7a 62 9c 7d 67 b9 55 24 aa 84 |.l],..zb.}g.U$..|
8000000010
8000000000 59 10 a8 e9 a7 5e fa e9 cd 8c 16 a2 7c 06 60 f6 |Y....^......|.`.|
8000000010
8000000000 7d ca 8e ea cc fe 2a 36 be b8 a8 b6 77 f9 fa 87 |}.....*6....w...|
8000000010
8000000000 4d 42 49 1e 0b ae a7 3b 42 50 68 bb c1 d5 89 96 |MBI....;BPh.....|
8000000010
8000000000 fc 3d c7 b7 82 39 06 a7 ad fc 00 81 05 5b 52 e1 |.=...9.......[R.|
8000000010
8000000000 03 c9 f5 86 46 34 0b 21 00 e5 b1 97 9a 55 eb 82 |....F4.!.....U..|
8000000010
5 disk raid xor check: 84 ^ f6 ^ 87 ^ 96 ^ e1 == 82, NOK
6 disk raid xor check: 84 ^ f6 ^ 87 ^ 96 ^ e1 ^ 82 == 0, OK
# for f in /dev/sd{a,b,d,c,e,f}; do hexdump -C -n 16 -s 0x10000000000 "$f"; done
10000000000 03 33 0a 04 d9 7a 44 4b dc 8f be 58 0b 80 8f 46 |.3...zDK...X...F|
10000000010
10000000000 79 5f 18 51 f7 44 03 59 7f aa ce 9d f1 a9 3d 73 |y_.Q.D.Y......=s|
10000000010
10000000000 67 f4 9e b2 34 b6 c2 43 b5 8d 2f 0d 5f 80 a4 6d |g...4..C../._..m|
10000000010
10000000000 4f ec f4 c9 da 04 64 db dc e9 e1 72 7f e4 74 06 |O.....d....r..t.|
10000000010
10000000000 52 74 78 2e c0 8c e1 8a ca 41 be ba da 4d 62 5e |Rtx......A...Mb^|
10000000010
10000000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
10000000010
5 disk raid xor check: 46 ^ 73 ^ 6d ^ 06 ^ 5e == 0, OK
6 disk raid xor check: 46 ^ 73 ^ 6d ^ 06 ^ 5e ^ 00 == 0, OK
So I did a binary search from 0x8000000000 to 0x10000000000 to see
where I start getting all zeros from the newest drive. I ended up at
offset 0xfaa2880000 (~0.98 TB or ~18 % into the disk). After that, it's
all zeros.
# for f in /dev/sd{a,b,d,c,e,f}; do hexdump -C -n 16 -s 0xfaa287fff8 "$f"; done
faa287fff8 e5 4d 6b e6 ef 7b 1f b0 2e 30 82 8e 5b 4b e0 30 |.Mk..{...0..[K.0|
faa2880008
faa287fff8 dd f7 ab 02 cf e8 a2 6d 93 a8 08 a7 d8 9e c7 b4 |.......m........|
faa2880008
faa287fff8 31 f8 7b d9 41 c7 72 13 f1 37 b6 4a 51 fc 46 74 |1.{.A.r..7.JQ.Ft|
faa2880008
faa287fff8 87 29 59 58 97 05 87 1b 1a 8d 83 84 83 b0 21 4a |.)YX..........!J|
faa2880008
faa287fff8 04 2b 32 6d 0f ab fb b7 56 22 bf e7 51 99 40 ba |.+2m....V"..Q.@.|
faa2880008
faa287fff8 f4 06 c8 81 00 00 03 ae 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
faa2880008
Now, at offset 0xfaa2880000 the 5 disk raid xor sums are OK:
0xfaa2880000: 2e ^ 93 ^ f1 ^ 1a ^ 56 = 0, OK
But immediately before that, I can't get the xor sums to line up:
0xfaa287ffff: b0 ^ 6d ^ 13 ^ 1b ^ b7 != ae (62 actually), NOK
This would mean that it's incorrect for both 5 and 6 disk raids.
So I did a binary search backwards to find out where the checksums match
again and came to offset 0xed90332000 (~0.93 TB or ~17 % into the disk).
# for f in /dev/sd{a,b,d,c,e,f}; do hexdump -C -n 16 -s 0xed90331ff8 "$f"; done
ed90331ff8 69 1a b1 fb 9f 80 cf fa 6f 97 dc b7 26 40 38 6f |i.......o...&@8o|
ed90332008
ed90331ff8 e3 58 c4 e7 7a 9a b5 a4 74 37 5a de d8 24 a6 e5 |.X..z...t7Z..$..|
ed90332008
ed90331ff8 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................|
ed90332008
ed90331ff8 53 0b 7c bb 49 d6 63 55 ff fb b2 40 35 00 03 39 |S.|.I.cU...@5..9|
ed90332008
ed90331ff8 9b 49 25 23 ec ad 89 0c ce a0 29 29 a2 86 bc c2 |.I%#......))....|
ed90332008
ed90331ff8 bd ff d3 7b bf 9e 6f f8 17 bc f3 8d e7 9b d0 65 |...{..o........e|
ed90332008
0xed90331fff: fa ^ a4 ^ ff ^ 55 ^ 0c == f8, OK for 6 disk raid
0xed90332000: 6f ^ 74 ^ ff ^ ff ^ ce != 17 (d5 actually), NOK
That is a span of ~52 GB where I presumably can't get the checksums
right. What does all this mean? What am I missing?
Best regards
// Patrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-23 9:47 Recover array after I panicked Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 10:16 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 10:23 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 10:46 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 11:12 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 11:36 ` Wols Lists
2017-04-23 11:47 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 11:53 ` Reindl Harald
2017-04-23 11:58 ` Roman Mamedov
2017-04-23 12:11 ` Wols Lists
2017-04-23 12:15 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 21:04 ` Phil Turmel
2017-04-24 21:56 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 23:35 ` Phil Turmel
2017-04-23 13:16 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 13:49 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:36 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 14:45 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 12:32 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 12:45 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 12:57 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:06 ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-23 14:09 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:20 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:25 ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-23 14:48 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 15:11 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 15:24 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 15:42 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 16:29 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 19:21 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 2:09 ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-24 7:34 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 11:04 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 12:13 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 12:37 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 12:54 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 13:39 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 14:05 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 14:21 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 16:00 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 23:00 ` Patrik Dahlström [this message]
2017-04-25 0:16 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 8:44 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 9:01 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 10:40 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 10:51 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 11:08 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 11:37 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 12:41 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 18:22 ` Wols Lists
2017-04-27 19:57 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-27 23:12 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28 7:11 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-28 9:52 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28 10:31 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-28 11:39 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28 22:46 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-29 9:56 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-05-02 13:08 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-05-02 13:11 ` Brad Campbell
2017-05-02 15:49 ` Anthony Youngman
2017-04-25 23:01 ` Patrik Dahlström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=727eeaf5-b856-305d-99b6-e42f3383b699@powerlamerz.org \
--to=risca@powerlamerz.org \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox