Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Patrik Dahlström" <risca@powerlamerz.org>
To: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recover array after I panicked
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fcdece2-68b7-8e5b-5995-caf15af18bf3@powerlamerz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170423131605.GA9955@metamorpher.de>



On 04/23/2017 03:16 PM, Andreas Klauer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:12:54PM +0200, Patrik Dahlström wrote:
>> I got some of that!
> 
>> [    3.100700] RAID conf printout:
>> [    3.100700]  --- level:5 rd:5 wd:5
>> [    3.100700]  disk 0, o:1, dev:sda
>> [    3.100700]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdb
>> [    3.100701]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdd
>> [    3.100701]  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdc
>> [    3.100701]  disk 4, o:1, dev:sde
>> [    3.101006] created bitmap (44 pages) for device md1
>> [    3.102245] md1: bitmap initialized from disk: read 3 pages, set 0 of
>> 89423 bits
>> [    3.159019] md1: detected capacity change from 0 to 24004163272704
> 
> Fairly standard, RAID5, presumably 1.2 metadata with 128M data offset, 
> which is the default mdadm uses lately. Older RAIDs would have smaller 
> data offsets.
> 
> So... ...the output above really is from before any of your accidents?
Yes, it is from before adding /dev/sdf and starting a reshape

> How old is your raid ...?
The raid is roughly 1 year old. It started as a combination of raids:
md0: 4x2TB raid5
md1: 2x6TB + md0 raid5

A few months after that, md0 was replaced with a 6 TB drive (/dev/sdd).
Last august I added /dev/sde and this january I added /dev/sde.
Yesterday I tried to add /dev/sdf.

> 
> Tested with loop devices:
> 
> # truncate -s 6001175126016 0 1 2 3 4
> # losetup --find --show
> # mdadm --create /dev/md42 --assume-clean --data-offset=128M --level=5 --raid-devices=5 /dev/loop[01234]

> 
> | [14580.373999] md/raid:md42: device loop4 operational as raid disk 4
> | [14580.373999] md/raid:md42: device loop3 operational as raid disk 3
> | [14580.374000] md/raid:md42: device loop2 operational as raid disk 2
> | [14580.374000] md/raid:md42: device loop1 operational as raid disk 1
> | [14580.374001] md/raid:md42: device loop0 operational as raid disk 0
> | [14580.374308] md/raid:md42: raid level 5 active with 5 out of 5 devices, algorithm 2
> | [14580.377043] md42: detected capacity change from 0 to 24004163272704
> 
> (Results in identical capacity as yours so it's the most likely match.)
> 
> Again, you'd do this with overlays only...
I did
$ mdadm --create /dev/md1 --assume-clean --data-offset=128M --level=5 --raid-devices=5 /dev/mapper/sd[abdce]
$ dmesg | tail
[10079.442770] md: bind<dm-2>
[10079.442835] md: bind<dm-5>
[10079.442889] md: bind<dm-1>
[10079.442954] md: bind<dm-3>
[10079.443015] md: bind<dm-4>
[10079.443814] md/raid:md1: device dm-4 operational as raid disk 4
[10079.443815] md/raid:md1: device dm-3 operational as raid disk 3
[10079.443816] md/raid:md1: device dm-1 operational as raid disk 2
[10079.443830] md/raid:md1: device dm-5 operational as raid disk 1
[10079.443830] md/raid:md1: device dm-2 operational as raid disk 0
[10079.444123] md/raid:md1: allocated 5432kB
[10079.444168] md/raid:md1: raid level 5 active with 5 out of 5 devices, algorithm 2
[10079.444169] RAID conf printout:
[10079.444170]  --- level:5 rd:5 wd:5
[10079.444171]  disk 0, o:1, dev:dm-2
[10079.444171]  disk 1, o:1, dev:dm-5
[10079.444172]  disk 2, o:1, dev:dm-1
[10079.444173]  disk 3, o:1, dev:dm-3
[10079.444173]  disk 4, o:1, dev:dm-4
[10079.444237] created bitmap (44 pages) for device md1
[10079.446272] md1: bitmap initialized from disk: read 3 pages, set 89423 of 89423 bits
[10079.451821] md1: detected capacity change from 0 to 24004163272704
$ mdadm --detail /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
        Version : 1.2
  Creation Time : Sun Apr 23 15:40:15 2017
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 23441565696 (22355.62 GiB 24004.16 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 5860391424 (5588.90 GiB 6001.04 GB)
   Raid Devices : 5
  Total Devices : 5
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

  Intent Bitmap : Internal

    Update Time : Sun Apr 23 15:40:15 2017
          State : clean 
 Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 512K

           Name : rack-server-1:1  (local to host rack-server-1)
           UUID : 6beee843:59371bd6:c9278c83:1eb89111
         Events : 0

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0     252        2        0      active sync   /dev/dm-2
       1     252        5        1      active sync   /dev/dm-5
       2     252        1        2      active sync   /dev/dm-1
       3     252        3        3      active sync   /dev/dm-3
       4     252        4        4      active sync   /dev/dm-4

$ mount /dev/md1 /storage
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md1,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error

       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail or so.

Still no luck. Was the drives added in the wrong order?

> 
> Regards
> Andreas Klauer
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-23 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-23  9:47 Recover array after I panicked Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 10:16 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 10:23   ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 10:46     ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 11:12       ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 11:36         ` Wols Lists
2017-04-23 11:47           ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 11:53             ` Reindl Harald
2017-04-23 11:58           ` Roman Mamedov
2017-04-23 12:11             ` Wols Lists
2017-04-23 12:15               ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 21:04                 ` Phil Turmel
2017-04-24 21:56                   ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 23:35                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-04-23 13:16         ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 13:49           ` Patrik Dahlström [this message]
2017-04-23 14:36             ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 14:45               ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 12:32     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 12:45       ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 12:57         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:06 ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-23 14:09   ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:20     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 14:25     ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-23 14:48   ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 15:11     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 15:24       ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 15:42       ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-23 16:29         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-23 19:21         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24  2:09           ` Brad Campbell
2017-04-24  7:34             ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 11:04               ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 12:13                 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 12:37                   ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 12:54                     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 13:39                       ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 14:05                         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 14:21                           ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-24 16:00                           ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-24 23:00                         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25  0:16                           ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25  8:44                             ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25  9:01                               ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 10:40                                 ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 10:51                                   ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 11:08                                   ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 11:37                                     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-25 12:41                                       ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-25 18:22                                       ` Wols Lists
2017-04-27 19:57                                     ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-27 23:12                                       ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28  7:11                                         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-28  9:52                                           ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28 10:31                                             ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-28 11:39                                               ` Andreas Klauer
2017-04-28 22:46                                         ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-04-29  9:56                                           ` Andreas Klauer
2017-05-02 13:08                                             ` Patrik Dahlström
2017-05-02 13:11                                               ` Brad Campbell
2017-05-02 15:49                                               ` Anthony Youngman
2017-04-25 23:01                 ` Patrik Dahlström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fcdece2-68b7-8e5b-5995-caf15af18bf3@powerlamerz.org \
    --to=risca@powerlamerz.org \
    --cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox