* Help. @ 2004-04-01 16:56 Jason C. Leach 2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård 2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jason C. Leach @ 2004-04-01 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid Help. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Help. 2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach @ 2004-04-01 17:00 ` Måns Rullgård 2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Måns Rullgård @ 2004-04-01 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid "Jason C. Leach" <jleach@ocis.net> writes: > Help. Thanks for the offer. I'd like to know how to set up four ATA disks for maximum performance, while retaining at least half the storage space, and giving some fault tolerance. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* hardware raid with IDE == bad? 2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach 2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård @ 2004-04-02 9:23 ` Mauricio 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mauricio @ 2004-04-02 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid Is a hardware raid (say one of those you connect to a unix box through its scsi port) that uses normal (as opposite to SATA) IDE drives (you know, ATA100 and above) a bad idea? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-02 9:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach 2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård 2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox