* [PATCH] md/raid5: protect lockless reshape_progress accesses
@ 2026-06-27 10:55 Chen Cheng
2026-07-11 15:37 ` yu kuai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chen Cheng @ 2026-06-27 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid, yukuai; +Cc: chencheng, linux-kernel
From: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>
During reshape:
- reshape_request() advances conf->reshape_progress.
- reshape_request() itself also reads conf->reshape_progress several times
while calculating sector_nr, writepos, and readpos for the current
reshape step.
- use_new_offset() reads conf->reshape_progress locklessly to decide
whether the current stripe should use data_offset or new_data_offset.
one possible scenario is:
CPU1 CPU2
reshape_request()
-> conf->reshape_progress += delta
ops_run_io()
-> use_new_offset(conf, sh)
-> progress = conf->reshape_progress
-> decide old layout or new layout
-> use data_offset or new_data_offset
reshape_progress is the boundary between old and new layout mapping.
If CPU2 observes an unprotected reshape_progress value, it can choose
the wrong layout offset for the current stripe.
if reshape_request() reads reshape_progress multiple times without
a stable snapshot, one iteration of reshape can calculate its range from
inconsistent progress values.
Fixes: 7a6613810785 ("md/raid5: reshape using largest of old and new chunk size")
The race report:
==================================================================
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ops_run_io / reshape_request
write to 0xffff89a8d3ef2270 of 8 bytes by task 1299 on cpu 7:
reshape_request+0x1292/0x17b0
raid5_sync_request+0x815/0xa00
md_do_sync.cold+0xf8d/0x1516
md_thread+0x15a/0x2d0
[....]
read to 0xffff89a8d3ef2270 of 8 bytes by task 1292 on cpu 9:
ops_run_io+0xc25/0x1960
handle_stripe+0x2273/0x4570
handle_active_stripes.isra.0+0x6e0/0xa50
raid5d+0x7d5/0xb90
[....]
value changed: 0x0000000000173700 -> 0x0000000000173800
==================================================================
Signed-off-by: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index eaee7f206ab8..b6809f1a3ab4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -1011,11 +1011,11 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf,
/* Determine if 'data_offset' or 'new_data_offset' should be used
* in this stripe_head.
*/
static int use_new_offset(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
{
- sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
+ sector_t progress = READ_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress);
/* Need a memory barrier to make sure we see the value
* of conf->generation, or ->data_offset that was set before
* reshape_progress was updated.
*/
smp_rmb();
@@ -6340,24 +6340,25 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
sector_t writepos, readpos, safepos;
sector_t stripe_addr;
int reshape_sectors;
struct list_head stripes;
sector_t retn;
+ sector_t reshape_progress = READ_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress);
if (sector_nr == 0) {
/* If restarting in the middle, skip the initial sectors */
if (mddev->reshape_backwards &&
- conf->reshape_progress < raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)) {
+ reshape_progress < raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)) {
sector_nr = raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)
- - conf->reshape_progress;
+ - reshape_progress;
} else if (mddev->reshape_backwards &&
- conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector) {
+ reshape_progress == MaxSector) {
/* shouldn't happen, but just in case, finish up.*/
sector_nr = MaxSector;
} else if (!mddev->reshape_backwards &&
- conf->reshape_progress > 0)
- sector_nr = conf->reshape_progress;
+ reshape_progress > 0)
+ sector_nr = reshape_progress;
sector_div(sector_nr, new_data_disks);
if (sector_nr) {
mddev->curr_resync_completed = sector_nr;
sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_completed);
*skipped = 1;
@@ -6377,13 +6378,13 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
* the data about to be copied would over-write the source of
* the data at the front of the range. i.e. one new_stripe
* along from reshape_progress new_maps to after where
* reshape_safe old_maps to
*/
- writepos = conf->reshape_progress;
+ writepos = reshape_progress;
sector_div(writepos, new_data_disks);
- readpos = conf->reshape_progress;
+ readpos = reshape_progress;
sector_div(readpos, data_disks);
safepos = conf->reshape_safe;
sector_div(safepos, data_disks);
if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
if (WARN_ON(writepos < reshape_sectors))
@@ -6404,11 +6405,11 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
/* Having calculated the 'writepos' possibly use it
* to set 'stripe_addr' which is where we will write to.
*/
if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
- if (WARN_ON(conf->reshape_progress == 0))
+ if (WARN_ON(reshape_progress == 0))
return MaxSector;
stripe_addr = writepos;
if (WARN_ON((mddev->dev_sectors &
~((sector_t)reshape_sectors - 1)) -
@@ -6514,14 +6515,21 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
}
list_add(&sh->lru, &stripes);
}
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (mddev->reshape_backwards)
- conf->reshape_progress -= reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
- else
- conf->reshape_progress += reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
+ if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
+ sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
+
+ progress -= reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
+ WRITE_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress, progress);
+ } else {
+ sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
+
+ progress += reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
+ WRITE_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress, progress);
+ }
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
/* Ok, those stripe are ready. We can start scheduling
* reads on the source stripes.
* The source stripes are determined by mapping the first and last
* block on the destination stripes.
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: protect lockless reshape_progress accesses
2026-06-27 10:55 [PATCH] md/raid5: protect lockless reshape_progress accesses Chen Cheng
@ 2026-07-11 15:37 ` yu kuai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: yu kuai @ 2026-07-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Cheng, linux-raid, yukuai; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
在 2026/6/27 18:55, Chen Cheng 写道:
> From: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>
>
> During reshape:
> - reshape_request() advances conf->reshape_progress.
> - reshape_request() itself also reads conf->reshape_progress several times
> while calculating sector_nr, writepos, and readpos for the current
> reshape step.
> - use_new_offset() reads conf->reshape_progress locklessly to decide
> whether the current stripe should use data_offset or new_data_offset.
>
> one possible scenario is:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> reshape_request()
> -> conf->reshape_progress += delta
> ops_run_io()
> -> use_new_offset(conf, sh)
> -> progress = conf->reshape_progress
> -> decide old layout or new layout
> -> use data_offset or new_data_offset
>
> reshape_progress is the boundary between old and new layout mapping.
>
> If CPU2 observes an unprotected reshape_progress value, it can choose
> the wrong layout offset for the current stripe.
>
> if reshape_request() reads reshape_progress multiple times without
> a stable snapshot, one iteration of reshape can calculate its range from
> inconsistent progress values.
>
> Fixes: 7a6613810785 ("md/raid5: reshape using largest of old and new chunk size")
>
> The race report:
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ops_run_io / reshape_request
>
> write to 0xffff89a8d3ef2270 of 8 bytes by task 1299 on cpu 7:
> reshape_request+0x1292/0x17b0
> raid5_sync_request+0x815/0xa00
> md_do_sync.cold+0xf8d/0x1516
> md_thread+0x15a/0x2d0
> [....]
>
> read to 0xffff89a8d3ef2270 of 8 bytes by task 1292 on cpu 9:
> ops_run_io+0xc25/0x1960
> handle_stripe+0x2273/0x4570
> handle_active_stripes.isra.0+0x6e0/0xa50
> raid5d+0x7d5/0xb90
> [....]
>
> value changed: 0x0000000000173700 -> 0x0000000000173800
> ==================================================================
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index eaee7f206ab8..b6809f1a3ab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -1011,11 +1011,11 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf,
> /* Determine if 'data_offset' or 'new_data_offset' should be used
> * in this stripe_head.
> */
> static int use_new_offset(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
> {
> - sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
> + sector_t progress = READ_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress);
> /* Need a memory barrier to make sure we see the value
> * of conf->generation, or ->data_offset that was set before
> * reshape_progress was updated.
> */
> smp_rmb();
> @@ -6340,24 +6340,25 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
> sector_t writepos, readpos, safepos;
> sector_t stripe_addr;
> int reshape_sectors;
> struct list_head stripes;
> sector_t retn;
> + sector_t reshape_progress = READ_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress);
>
> if (sector_nr == 0) {
> /* If restarting in the middle, skip the initial sectors */
> if (mddev->reshape_backwards &&
> - conf->reshape_progress < raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)) {
> + reshape_progress < raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)) {
> sector_nr = raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)
> - - conf->reshape_progress;
> + - reshape_progress;
> } else if (mddev->reshape_backwards &&
> - conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector) {
> + reshape_progress == MaxSector) {
> /* shouldn't happen, but just in case, finish up.*/
> sector_nr = MaxSector;
> } else if (!mddev->reshape_backwards &&
> - conf->reshape_progress > 0)
> - sector_nr = conf->reshape_progress;
> + reshape_progress > 0)
> + sector_nr = reshape_progress;
> sector_div(sector_nr, new_data_disks);
> if (sector_nr) {
> mddev->curr_resync_completed = sector_nr;
> sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_completed);
> *skipped = 1;
> @@ -6377,13 +6378,13 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
> * the data about to be copied would over-write the source of
> * the data at the front of the range. i.e. one new_stripe
> * along from reshape_progress new_maps to after where
> * reshape_safe old_maps to
> */
> - writepos = conf->reshape_progress;
> + writepos = reshape_progress;
> sector_div(writepos, new_data_disks);
> - readpos = conf->reshape_progress;
> + readpos = reshape_progress;
> sector_div(readpos, data_disks);
> safepos = conf->reshape_safe;
> sector_div(safepos, data_disks);
> if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
> if (WARN_ON(writepos < reshape_sectors))
> @@ -6404,11 +6405,11 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
>
> /* Having calculated the 'writepos' possibly use it
> * to set 'stripe_addr' which is where we will write to.
> */
> if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
> - if (WARN_ON(conf->reshape_progress == 0))
> + if (WARN_ON(reshape_progress == 0))
> return MaxSector;
>
> stripe_addr = writepos;
> if (WARN_ON((mddev->dev_sectors &
> ~((sector_t)reshape_sectors - 1)) -
> @@ -6514,14 +6515,21 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *sk
> set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
> }
> list_add(&sh->lru, &stripes);
> }
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> - if (mddev->reshape_backwards)
> - conf->reshape_progress -= reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
> - else
> - conf->reshape_progress += reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
> + if (mddev->reshape_backwards) {
> + sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
> +
> + progress -= reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
> + WRITE_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress, progress);
> + } else {
> + sector_t progress = conf->reshape_progress;
> +
> + progress += reshape_sectors * new_data_disks;
> + WRITE_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress, progress);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> /* Ok, those stripe are ready. We can start scheduling
> * reads on the source stripes.
> * The source stripes are determined by mapping the first and last
> * block on the destination stripes.
AI report there are still other places, please check:
1. get_reshape_loc(), the fast path before taking device_lock:
if (likely(conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector))
return LOC_NO_RESHAPE;
The comment right below it already mentions the 64bit-on-32bit tearing
concern, so it makes sense to mark it:
if (likely(READ_ONCE(conf->reshape_progress) == MaxSector))
2. raid5_make_request():
if (likely(conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector)) {
Same - called on every IO, lockless.
For consistency the `== MaxSector` check in raid5_remove_disk() could use
READ_ONCE() too, though it's a reconfig path.
--
Thanks,
Kuai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-11 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-27 10:55 [PATCH] md/raid5: protect lockless reshape_progress accesses Chen Cheng
2026-07-11 15:37 ` yu kuai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox