Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [mdadm git pull] support for detecting platform raid capabilities and some fixes
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:24:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20811280924je623664s5d3b2fe9e990c06e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3eb2510811262224h65d5b774j502c8a635328fe7c@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:25, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 00:45, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> This implementation crawls through sysfs to put this information
>>>> together, I believe it is crawling in a future proof fashion, but here
>>>> are my assumptions:
>>>> 1/ /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ahci/<x>/device will identify a pci ahci device
>>>
>>> Why "device"? You just check for the "device" attribute file of the PCI device?
>>>
>>
>> $ ls /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ahci/
>> 0000:00:1f.2/   module/ uevent
>> bind                    new_id  unbind
>>
>> I look for the 'device' file to disambiguate '0000:00:1f.2' from
>> 'module' or some other object that appears in the future.  The other
>> attributes are discarded because they are not directories.
>
> But only devices of the bus "pci" have this attribute. The code looks
> like it it should be able to handle some other buses to, at least the
> bus values is passed around, but the pci-device attribute "device" is
> hard coded. That's why I asked.
> It's fine if you want to do it that way. If you just look for a
> "struct device" of that <bus>, resolving "subsystem" and checking if
> the tail of the string matches "/<bus>" should be fine.

gah, I was confusing the 'device' I find here "/sys/block/sda/device"
with the pci device id.  Yes, checking on 'subsystem' seems to be
exactly what I want.

Thanks,
Dan

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-28 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-26 23:45 [mdadm git pull] support for detecting platform raid capabilities and some fixes Dan Williams
2008-11-27  0:13 ` Kay Sievers
2008-11-27  3:25   ` Dan Williams
2008-11-27  6:24     ` Kay Sievers
2008-11-28 17:24       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2008-11-27 23:39 ` Neil Brown
2008-11-28 19:16   ` Dan Williams
2008-12-02  6:18     ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9c3a7c20811280924je623664s5d3b2fe9e990c06e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox