* [PATCH v4 0/2] block, md: suspend md around queue limits updates
@ 2026-11-12 13:46 Jack Wang
2026-11-12 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks " Jack Wang
2026-11-12 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] md: suspend the array instead of freezing the queue for " Jack Wang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2026-11-12 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai, Song Liu, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Li Nan, Xiao Ni, linux-raid, linux-block, linux-kernel
From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Writing to a queue limits attribute of an md array while a spare is
being re-added deadlocks the array. I reported this earlier here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/CAMGffE=heGA3y8FjQ0Sm1jj-kd-=H9Y54WozKASSEZhc9UNKjA@mail.gmail.com/
Four tasks, one array:
udev-worker queue_attr_store() holds q->limits_lock, waits in
blk_mq_freeze_queue() for q_usage_counter to drain
fio holds a q_usage_counter reference, parked in
md_handle_request()'s is_suspended() loop
mdadm suspended the array, waits for reconfig_mutex
md_start_sync holds reconfig_mutex, waits for q->limits_lock
Since commit c99f66e4084a ("block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock
order in sysfs store methods") the sysfs store holds q->limits_lock
across the freeze. A bio parked in md_handle_request() while the array
is suspended still holds a q_usage_counter reference, so that freeze
never completes.
v3 froze the queue in mddev_suspend(). Review showed this deadlocks
against raid1d/raid10d resubmitting a split bio and against raid456 I/O
waiting on an interrupted reshape. Following Yu Kuai's suggestion, v4
lets a bio based disk suspend itself instead of freezing its queue:
- Patch 1 adds optional ->suspend() and ->resume() to
block_device_operations. queue_attr_store() and the integrity
flag_store() call ->suspend() before taking q->limits_lock, commit the
limits without a freeze, then call ->resume().
- Patch 2 implements them for md with mddev_suspend() and
mddev_resume().
The order is suspend, then q->limits_lock, as in mddev_update_io_opt().
A suspend already held by another task only nests.
Known limitation: md_submit_bio() reads the limits in
bio_split_to_limits() before taking active_io, so a bio already there
when the suspend completes can see a mix of old and new limits.
mddev_update_io_opt() has the same window.
Christoph, does a ->suspend()/->resume() pair in block_device_operations
fit what you had in mind?
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20261102154847.198472-1-jinpu.wang@ionos.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/e2c36f31-d198-40a7-a18d-156e1fd6fbb2@fygo.io/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20260909063029.GC29874@lst.de/T/#t
Changes since v3:
- Drop the freeze in mddev_suspend(); add ->suspend()/->resume() to
block_device_operations, as suggested by Yu Kuai.
- Also cover the integrity flag_store() path.
- Rebased on v7.4-rc1.
Testing: the reproducer below, 20 fail/remove/add cycles with fio in
flight and a loop writing queue/max_sectors_kb, on a 6.12 based kernel
with lockdep enabled. No lockdep reports, no hung tasks. That kernel
had the queue_attr_store() change only; the flag_store() change and the
rebase to v7.4-rc1 are build tested only.
A blktests case for this deadlock was sent separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910100916.1638378-1-jinpu.wang@ionos.com/
The reproducer:
mdadm -C /dev/md111 --force -e 1.2 --assume-clean -l 1 \
--bitmap=internal -n 2 /dev/ram0 /dev/ram1
fio --direct=1 --rw=randrw --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=32 --numjobs=4 \
--time_based=1 --runtime=180 --filename=/dev/md111 --name=repro &
while :; do
echo 128 > /sys/block/md111/queue/max_sectors_kb 2>/dev/null
done &
for i in $(seq 20); do
mdadm /dev/md111 --fail /dev/ram0
mdadm /dev/md111 --remove /dev/ram0
mdadm /dev/md111 --add /dev/ram0
mdadm --wait /dev/md111
done
Jack Wang (2):
block: suspend bio based disks around queue limits updates
md: suspend the array instead of freezing the queue for limits updates
block/blk-integrity.c | 10 ++++++++--
block/blk-sysfs.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
block/blk.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/md.c | 12 ++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 7 +++++++
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks around queue limits updates
2026-11-12 13:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] block, md: suspend md around queue limits updates Jack Wang
@ 2026-11-12 13:46 ` Jack Wang
2026-11-12 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] md: suspend the array instead of freezing the queue for " Jack Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2026-11-12 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai, Song Liu, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Li Nan, Xiao Ni, linux-raid, linux-block, linux-kernel
queue_attr_store() freezes the queue under q->limits_lock. For md this can
deadlock: a bio parked while the array is suspended still holds a
q_usage_counter reference, so the freeze waits for it, while the suspender
waits for reconfig_mutex held by md_start_sync(), which waits for
q->limits_lock.
Add optional ->suspend() and ->resume() block_device_operations. When
present, queue_attr_store() and the integrity flag_store() suspend the disk
before taking q->limits_lock and commit the limits without freezing the
queue. Other disks behave as before.
Fixes: c99f66e4084a ("block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods")
Suggested-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
---
block/blk-integrity.c | 10 ++++++++--
block/blk-sysfs.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
block/blk.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-integrity.c b/block/blk-integrity.c
index 964eebbee14d..b449e7c04eea 100644
--- a/block/blk-integrity.c
+++ b/block/blk-integrity.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_integrity_profile_name);
static ssize_t flag_store(struct device *dev, const char *page, size_t count,
unsigned char flag)
{
- struct request_queue *q = dev_to_disk(dev)->queue;
+ struct gendisk *disk = dev_to_disk(dev);
+ struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
struct queue_limits lim;
unsigned long val;
int err;
@@ -235,6 +236,10 @@ static ssize_t flag_store(struct device *dev, const char *page, size_t count,
if (err)
return err;
+ err = blk_disk_suspend(disk);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
/* note that the flags are inverted vs the values in the sysfs files */
lim = queue_limits_start_update(q);
if (val)
@@ -242,7 +247,8 @@ static ssize_t flag_store(struct device *dev, const char *page, size_t count,
else
lim.integrity.flags |= flag;
- err = queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(q, &lim);
+ err = blk_disk_commit_limits(disk, &lim);
+ blk_disk_resume(disk);
if (err)
return err;
return count;
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index 520972676ab4..3cbe36d04699 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -887,20 +887,27 @@ queue_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
return -EIO;
if (entry->store_limit) {
+ struct queue_limits lim;
ssize_t res;
- struct queue_limits lim = queue_limits_start_update(q);
+ res = blk_disk_suspend(disk);
+ if (res)
+ return res;
+
+ lim = queue_limits_start_update(q);
res = entry->store_limit(disk, page, length, &lim);
if (res < 0) {
queue_limits_cancel_update(q);
- return res;
+ goto out_resume;
}
- res = queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(q, &lim);
- if (res)
- return res;
- return length;
+ res = blk_disk_commit_limits(disk, &lim);
+ if (!res)
+ res = length;
+out_resume:
+ blk_disk_resume(disk);
+ return res;
}
return entry->store(disk, page, length);
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index ed2172472622..1c214f0bc178 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -661,6 +661,26 @@ void drop_partition(struct block_device *part);
void bdev_set_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sectors);
+/* Suspend before queue_limits_start_update(), never under q->limits_lock. */
+static inline int blk_disk_suspend(struct gendisk *disk)
+{
+ return disk->fops->suspend ? disk->fops->suspend(disk) : 0;
+}
+
+static inline void blk_disk_resume(struct gendisk *disk)
+{
+ if (disk->fops->suspend)
+ disk->fops->resume(disk);
+}
+
+static inline int blk_disk_commit_limits(struct gendisk *disk,
+ struct queue_limits *lim)
+{
+ if (disk->fops->suspend)
+ return queue_limits_commit_update(disk->queue, lim);
+ return queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(disk->queue, lim);
+}
+
struct gendisk *__alloc_disk_node(struct request_queue *q, int node_id,
struct lock_class_key *lkclass);
struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(struct queue_limits *lim, int node_id);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 0c2010230632..0011b7c0740f 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1601,6 +1601,13 @@ struct block_device_operations {
enum blk_unique_id id_type);
int (*init_dma_buf_io_ctx)(struct block_device *,
struct dma_buf_io_ctx *);
+ /*
+ * Optional, for bio based drivers that cannot be frozen under
+ * q->limits_lock: stop I/O around a sysfs limits update. Called
+ * before q->limits_lock is taken, with no queue frozen.
+ */
+ int (*suspend)(struct gendisk *disk);
+ void (*resume)(struct gendisk *disk);
struct module *owner;
const struct pr_ops *pr_ops;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] md: suspend the array instead of freezing the queue for limits updates
2026-11-12 13:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] block, md: suspend md around queue limits updates Jack Wang
2026-11-12 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks " Jack Wang
@ 2026-11-12 13:47 ` Jack Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2026-11-12 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai, Song Liu, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Li Nan, Xiao Ni, linux-raid, linux-block, linux-kernel
Provide ->suspend() and ->resume() for md_fops using mddev_suspend() and
mddev_resume(), so sysfs limits updates no longer freeze the queue.
mddev_suspend() only waits for active_io, but md_submit_bio() reads the
limits in bio_split_to_limits() before taking it. A bio already there may
see a mix of old and new limits, as with mddev_update_io_opt().
Fixes: c99f66e4084a ("block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods")
Suggested-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 03e35386a802..c9fa4e99569a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8669,6 +8669,16 @@ static unsigned int md_check_events(struct gendisk *disk, unsigned int clearing)
return ret;
}
+static int md_suspend_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
+{
+ return mddev_suspend(disk->private_data, true);
+}
+
+static void md_resume_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
+{
+ mddev_resume(disk->private_data);
+}
+
static void md_free_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
{
struct mddev *mddev = disk->private_data;
@@ -8689,6 +8699,8 @@ const struct block_device_operations md_fops =
.getgeo = md_getgeo,
.check_events = md_check_events,
.set_read_only = md_set_read_only,
+ .suspend = md_suspend_disk,
+ .resume = md_resume_disk,
.free_disk = md_free_disk,
};
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks around queue limits updates
2026-11-12 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks " Jack Wang
@ 2026-11-12 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-12 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jack Wang; +Cc: linux-raid, yukuai
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] block: missing __releases() annotation on
blk_disk_commit_limits()
--
commit 191cb84f3b159c80a0741f7887d437ec63eb1187
Author: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
block: suspend bio based disks around queue limits updates
This commit adds optional ->suspend() and ->resume() block_device_operations
callbacks and uses them in queue_attr_store() and flag_store() to suspend the
disk before taking q->limits_lock and commit queue limits without freezing
the queue.
> diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
> index ed21724726223..1c214f0bc1780 100644
> --- a/block/blk.h
> +++ b/block/blk.h
> @@ -661,6 +661,26 @@ void drop_partition(struct block_device *part);
>
> void bdev_set_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sectors);
>
> +/* Suspend before queue_limits_start_update(), never under q->limits_lock. */
> +static inline int blk_disk_suspend(struct gendisk *disk)
> +{
> + return disk->fops->suspend ? disk->fops->suspend(disk) : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_disk_resume(struct gendisk *disk)
> +{
> + if (disk->fops->suspend)
> + disk->fops->resume(disk);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int blk_disk_commit_limits(struct gendisk *disk,
> + struct queue_limits *lim)
> +{
> + if (disk->fops->suspend)
> + return queue_limits_commit_update(disk->queue, lim);
> + return queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(disk->queue, lim);
> +}
[Severity: Low]
Should blk_disk_commit_limits() have a __releases(&disk->queue->limits_lock)
annotation?
block/Makefile enables CONTEXT_ANALYSIS := y, and both
queue_limits_commit_update() and queue_limits_commit_update_frozen() are
annotated with __releases(&q->limits_lock) to pair with
queue_limits_start_update(). Without the annotation on
blk_disk_commit_limits(), building with Clang and
CONFIG_WARN_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS=y triggers -Wthread-safety warnings in
blk_disk_commit_limits() and its callers flag_store() and queue_attr_store().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112134700.372702-1-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-12 14:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-12 13:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] block, md: suspend md around queue limits updates Jack Wang
2026-11-12 13:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] block: suspend bio based disks " Jack Wang
2026-11-12 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] md: suspend the array instead of freezing the queue for " Jack Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox