From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dillowda@ornl.gov, roland@purestorage.com,
brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 10/15] srp_transport: Simplify attribute initialization code
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:58:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1768378.72YRuqLgif@asus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5207288.nSt5MkVMpO@asus>
Eliminate the private_rport_attrs[] array and the SETUP_*() macros
used to set up that array since the information in that array
duplicates the information in the static device attributes. Also,
verify whether SRP_RPORT_ATTRS is large enough since it is easy
to forget to update that macro when adding new attributes.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 26 ++++----------------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
index 07c4394..0d85f79 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct srp_internal {
struct device_attribute *host_attrs[SRP_HOST_ATTRS + 1];
struct device_attribute *rport_attrs[SRP_RPORT_ATTRS + 1];
- struct device_attribute private_rport_attrs[SRP_RPORT_ATTRS];
struct transport_container rport_attr_cont;
};
@@ -72,24 +71,6 @@ static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(srp_host_class, "srp_host", srp_host_setup,
static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(srp_rport_class, "srp_remote_ports",
NULL, NULL, NULL);
-#define SETUP_TEMPLATE(attrb, field, perm, test, ro_test, ro_perm) \
- i->private_##attrb[count] = dev_attr_##field; \
- i->private_##attrb[count].attr.mode = perm; \
- if (ro_test) { \
- i->private_##attrb[count].attr.mode = ro_perm; \
- i->private_##attrb[count].store = NULL; \
- } \
- i->attrb[count] = &i->private_##attrb[count]; \
- if (test) \
- count++
-
-#define SETUP_RPORT_ATTRIBUTE_RD(field) \
- SETUP_TEMPLATE(rport_attrs, field, S_IRUGO, 1, 0, 0)
-
-#define SETUP_RPORT_ATTRIBUTE_RW(field) \
- SETUP_TEMPLATE(rport_attrs, field, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, \
- 1, 1, S_IRUGO)
-
#define SRP_PID(p) \
(p)->port_id[0], (p)->port_id[1], (p)->port_id[2], (p)->port_id[3], \
(p)->port_id[4], (p)->port_id[5], (p)->port_id[6], (p)->port_id[7], \
@@ -326,9 +307,10 @@ srp_attach_transport(struct srp_function_template *ft)
i->rport_attr_cont.ac.match = srp_rport_match;
count = 0;
- SETUP_RPORT_ATTRIBUTE_RD(port_id);
- SETUP_RPORT_ATTRIBUTE_RD(roles);
- i->rport_attrs[count] = NULL;
+ i->rport_attrs[count++] = &dev_attr_port_id;
+ i->rport_attrs[count++] = &dev_attr_roles;
+ i->rport_attrs[count++] = NULL;
+ BUG_ON(count > ARRAY_SIZE(i->rport_attrs));
transport_container_register(&i->rport_attr_cont);
--
1.7.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-25 14:45 [PATCH 00/15, v3] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:47 ` [PATCH 01/15] ib_srp: Enlarge block layer timeout Bart Van Assche
2012-03-29 16:59 ` Dave Dillow
[not found] ` <20120329165931.GA19700-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-22 16:01 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <4F942B74.4040106-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-30 15:11 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1335798691.441.2.camel-zHLflQxYYDO4Hhoo1DtQwJ9G+ZOsUmrO@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-19 10:50 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <4FB77AEE.7030100-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-30 4:56 ` David Dillow
2012-03-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] ib_srp: Introduce srp_handle_qp_err() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] ib_srp: Micro-optimize srp_queuecommand() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] ib_srp: Suppress superfluous error messages Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:53 ` [PATCH 05/15] ib_srp: Avoid that SCSI error handling triggers a crash Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] ib_srp: Introduce the helper function srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/15] ib_srp: Eliminate state SRP_TARGET_DEAD Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH 08/15] ib_srp: Make srp_disconnect_target() wait for IB completions Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:57 ` [PATCH 09/15] srp_transport: Fix atttribute registration Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-03-25 14:59 ` [PATCH 11/15] srp_transport: Document sysfs attributes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:00 ` [PATCH 12/15] ib_srp: " Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:01 ` [PATCH 13/15] ib_srp: Allow SRP disconnect through sysfs Bart Van Assche
2012-07-16 22:20 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <500493B4.4010303-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 12:55 ` bart-LmZ/31Jx5xYUl6sPKNhdgg
2012-03-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 14/15] ib_srp: Introduce a temporary variable in srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 15/15] ib_srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:18 ` [PATCH 00/15, v3] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-27 16:37 ` Dave Dillow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1768378.72YRuqLgif@asus \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox