From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: dillowda-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org,
roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/15] ib_srp: Eliminate state SRP_TARGET_DEAD
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:55:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5031839.IRal8oFZf7@asus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5207288.nSt5MkVMpO@asus>
Only queue removal work after having changed the target state
into SRP_TARGET_REMOVED and not if that state was already equal
to SRP_TARGET_REMOVED. That allows to remove the state
SRP_TARGET_DEAD. Add a call to srp_disconnect_target() in
srp_remove_target() - due to previous changes it is now safe to
invoke that last function even if the IB connection has already
been disconnected. This change allows to replace the target
removal code in srp_remove_one() by a call to srp_remove_target().
Rename srp_target_port.work into srp_target_port.remove_work to
reflect its usage. Move function srp_change_state() to just
before srp_change_state_to_removed() to avoid having to
introduce a forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 108 +++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h | 5 +-
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
index b4b825d..9125a9c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -428,6 +428,27 @@ static int srp_send_req(struct srp_target_port *target)
return status;
}
+static bool srp_change_state(struct srp_target_port *target,
+ enum srp_target_state old,
+ enum srp_target_state new)
+{
+ bool changed = false;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&target->lock);
+ if (target->state == old) {
+ target->state = new;
+ changed = true;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&target->lock);
+
+ return changed;
+}
+
+static bool srp_change_state_to_removed(struct srp_target_port *target)
+{
+ return srp_change_state(target, SRP_TARGET_LIVE, SRP_TARGET_REMOVED);
+}
+
static bool srp_change_conn_state(struct srp_target_port *target,
bool connected)
{
@@ -458,21 +479,6 @@ static void srp_disconnect_target(struct srp_target_port *target)
}
}
-static bool srp_change_state(struct srp_target_port *target,
- enum srp_target_state old,
- enum srp_target_state new)
-{
- bool changed = false;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&target->lock);
- if (target->state == old) {
- target->state = new;
- changed = true;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&target->lock);
- return changed;
-}
-
static void srp_free_req_data(struct srp_target_port *target)
{
struct ib_device *ibdev = target->srp_host->srp_dev->dev;
@@ -508,9 +514,12 @@ static void srp_del_scsi_host_attr(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
static void srp_remove_target(struct srp_target_port *target)
{
+ WARN_ON(target->state != SRP_TARGET_REMOVED);
+
srp_del_scsi_host_attr(target->scsi_host);
srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
scsi_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
+ srp_disconnect_target(target);
ib_destroy_cm_id(target->cm_id);
srp_free_target_ib(target);
srp_free_req_data(target);
@@ -520,10 +529,9 @@ static void srp_remove_target(struct srp_target_port *target)
static void srp_remove_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct srp_target_port *target =
- container_of(work, struct srp_target_port, work);
+ container_of(work, struct srp_target_port, remove_work);
- if (!srp_change_state(target, SRP_TARGET_DEAD, SRP_TARGET_REMOVED))
- return;
+ WARN_ON(target->state != SRP_TARGET_REMOVED);
spin_lock(&target->srp_host->target_lock);
list_del(&target->list);
@@ -695,17 +703,9 @@ err:
* However, we have to defer the real removal because we
* are in the context of the SCSI error handler now, which
* will deadlock if we call scsi_remove_host().
- *
- * Schedule our work inside the lock to avoid a race with
- * the flush_scheduled_work() in srp_remove_one().
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&target->lock);
- if (target->state == SRP_TARGET_LIVE) {
- target->state = SRP_TARGET_DEAD;
- INIT_WORK(&target->work, srp_remove_work);
- queue_work(ib_wq, &target->work);
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&target->lock);
+ if (srp_change_state_to_removed(target))
+ queue_work(ib_wq, &target->remove_work);
scsi_target_unblock(&shost->shost_gendev);
@@ -1300,9 +1300,7 @@ static int srp_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
unsigned long flags;
int len;
- if (target->state == SRP_TARGET_DEAD ||
- target->state == SRP_TARGET_REMOVED ||
- !target->connected) {
+ if (target->state == SRP_TARGET_REMOVED || !target->connected) {
scmnd->result = DID_BAD_TARGET << 16;
scmnd->scsi_done(scmnd);
return 0;
@@ -1652,9 +1650,7 @@ static int srp_send_tsk_mgmt(struct srp_target_port *target,
struct srp_iu *iu;
struct srp_tsk_mgmt *tsk_mgmt;
- if (target->state == SRP_TARGET_DEAD ||
- target->state == SRP_TARGET_REMOVED ||
- !target->connected)
+ if (target->state == SRP_TARGET_REMOVED || !target->connected)
return -1;
init_completion(&target->tsk_mgmt_done);
@@ -2229,6 +2225,7 @@ static ssize_t srp_create_target(struct device *dev,
sizeof (struct srp_indirect_buf) +
target->cmd_sg_cnt * sizeof (struct srp_direct_buf);
+ INIT_WORK(&target->remove_work, srp_remove_work);
spin_lock_init(&target->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&target->free_tx);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&target->free_reqs);
@@ -2462,8 +2459,7 @@ static void srp_remove_one(struct ib_device *device)
{
struct srp_device *srp_dev;
struct srp_host *host, *tmp_host;
- LIST_HEAD(target_list);
- struct srp_target_port *target, *tmp_target;
+ struct srp_target_port *target;
srp_dev = ib_get_client_data(device, &srp_client);
@@ -2476,36 +2472,26 @@ static void srp_remove_one(struct ib_device *device)
wait_for_completion(&host->released);
/*
- * Mark all target ports as removed, so we stop queueing
- * commands and don't try to reconnect.
+ * Remove all target ports. Wait for any removal tasks that
+ * may already have been started.
*/
spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(target, &host->target_list, list) {
- spin_lock_irq(&target->lock);
- target->state = SRP_TARGET_REMOVED;
- spin_unlock_irq(&target->lock);
+ while (!list_empty(&host->target_list)) {
+ target = list_first_entry(&host->target_list,
+ struct srp_target_port, list);
+ if (srp_change_state_to_removed(target)) {
+ list_del(&target->list);
+ spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
+ srp_remove_target(target);
+ spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
+ flush_work(&target->remove_work);
+ spin_lock(&host->target_lock);
+ }
}
spin_unlock(&host->target_lock);
- /*
- * Wait for any reconnection tasks that may have
- * started before we marked our target ports as
- * removed, and any target port removal tasks.
- */
- flush_workqueue(ib_wq);
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(target, tmp_target,
- &host->target_list, list) {
- srp_del_scsi_host_attr(target->scsi_host);
- srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
- scsi_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
- srp_disconnect_target(target);
- ib_destroy_cm_id(target->cm_id);
- srp_free_target_ib(target);
- srp_free_req_data(target);
- scsi_host_put(target->scsi_host);
- }
-
kfree(host);
}
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
index ef95fa4..de2d0b3 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h
@@ -80,8 +80,7 @@ enum {
enum srp_target_state {
SRP_TARGET_LIVE,
- SRP_TARGET_DEAD,
- SRP_TARGET_REMOVED
+ SRP_TARGET_REMOVED,
};
enum srp_iu_type {
@@ -175,7 +174,7 @@ struct srp_target_port {
struct srp_iu *rx_ring[SRP_RQ_SIZE];
struct srp_request req_ring[SRP_CMD_SQ_SIZE];
- struct work_struct work;
+ struct work_struct remove_work;
struct list_head list;
struct completion done;
--
1.7.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-25 14:45 [PATCH 00/15, v3] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:47 ` [PATCH 01/15] ib_srp: Enlarge block layer timeout Bart Van Assche
2012-03-29 16:59 ` Dave Dillow
[not found] ` <20120329165931.GA19700-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-22 16:01 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <4F942B74.4040106-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-30 15:11 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1335798691.441.2.camel-zHLflQxYYDO4Hhoo1DtQwJ9G+ZOsUmrO@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-19 10:50 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <4FB77AEE.7030100-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-30 4:56 ` David Dillow
2012-03-25 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] ib_srp: Introduce srp_handle_qp_err() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] ib_srp: Micro-optimize srp_queuecommand() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] ib_srp: Suppress superfluous error messages Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:53 ` [PATCH 05/15] ib_srp: Avoid that SCSI error handling triggers a crash Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] ib_srp: Introduce the helper function srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:55 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH 08/15] ib_srp: Make srp_disconnect_target() wait for IB completions Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:57 ` [PATCH 09/15] srp_transport: Fix atttribute registration Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/15] srp_transport: Simplify attribute initialization code Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 14:59 ` [PATCH 11/15] srp_transport: Document sysfs attributes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:00 ` [PATCH 12/15] ib_srp: " Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:01 ` [PATCH 13/15] ib_srp: Allow SRP disconnect through sysfs Bart Van Assche
2012-07-16 22:20 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <500493B4.4010303-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 12:55 ` bart-LmZ/31Jx5xYUl6sPKNhdgg
2012-03-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 14/15] ib_srp: Introduce a temporary variable in srp_remove_target() Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:03 ` [PATCH 15/15] ib_srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus Bart Van Assche
2012-03-25 15:18 ` [PATCH 00/15, v3] Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes Bart Van Assche
2012-03-27 16:37 ` Dave Dillow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5031839.IRal8oFZf7@asus \
--to=bvanassche-hinycgiudog@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dillowda-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox