Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: longli@microsoft.com
Cc: kotaranov@microsoft.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
	kys@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com,
	shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com, horms@kernel.org,
	ernis@linux.microsoft.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	shirazsaleem@microsoft.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 08/13] net: mana: do not bail out of mana_detach on dealloc failure
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:46:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178849721018.4131868.4122826158754695838@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901014442.2945689-9-longli@microsoft.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1

- [Low] Commit-message framing concern: the reviewed patch removes the
  `return err` after `mana_dealloc_queues()` in `mana_detach()`…

--

net: mana: do not bail out of mana_detach on dealloc failure

This removes the early return that mana_detach() took when
mana_dealloc_queues() returned an error, so that netif_device_detach()
and mana_cleanup_port_context() always run. The error is now only
logged.

> mana_detach() sets port_is_up = false before calling
> mana_dealloc_queues(). If that call were to fail and return early,
> netif_device_detach() and mana_cleanup_port_context() are skipped,
> leaving the port in an inconsistent state where port_is_up is false but
> netif_device_present() still returns true.
>
> With the ethtool, MTU and XDP paths converted to pre-allocate and swap,
> the callers that reach this code with from_close == false are the TX
> timeout reset handler and the suspend path. For the reset handler the
> inconsistent state is fatal: its mana_detach() would overwrite
> port_st_save with false, so the following mana_attach() skips queue
> allocation and leaves the port permanently dead. For suspend it leaves
> the port context allocated across the transition.

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug in the code, but could the description of the reset
handler case be toned down, since the "permanently dead" port does not
look reachable?

mana_dealloc_queues() has exactly one non-zero return:

drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c:mana_dealloc_queues() {
	if (apc->port_is_up)
		return -EINVAL;
	...
}

and mana_detach() clears that flag two statements before the call:

drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c:mana_detach() {
	apc->port_st_save = apc->port_is_up;
	apc->port_is_up = false;
	...
	if (apc->port_st_save) {
		err = mana_dealloc_queues(ndev);
	...
}

Every other error inside mana_dealloc_queues(), such as the
mana_disable_vport_rx() failure, is only logged and the function ends with
an unconditional return 0.

The last paragraph does say "in practice cannot fail here since port_is_up
is already false", and the text uses "were to fail" / "would overwrite",
so the conditional framing is already there. Would it read better to state
up front that this is a robustness cleanup for an unreachable branch,
rather than describing a fatal reset-handler outcome first?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> index af2fdd5e876eb..5c5d1edd20f84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> @@ -4594,10 +4594,8 @@ int mana_detach(struct net_device *ndev, bool from_close)
>  
>  	if (apc->port_st_save) {
>  		err = mana_dealloc_queues(ndev);
> -		if (err) {
> +		if (err)
>  			netdev_err(ndev, "%s failed to deallocate queues: %d\n", __func__, err);
> -			return err;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!from_close) {

The code change itself looks fine; with port_is_up already false the
deleted return was dead code, so no live caller changes behaviour here.
Consistent with that, there is no Fixes: tag on the patch.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260901014442.2945689-1-longli%40microsoft.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  1:44 [PATCH net-next v3 00/13] net: mana: reconfigure by replacing the queue set Long Li
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/13] net: mana: add queue-set allocation and teardown helpers Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/13] net: mana: share the EQ pool across a queue-set swap Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/13] net: mana: swap queue sets in mana_set_channels Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/13] net: mana: swap queue sets in mana_set_ringparam Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/13] net: mana: swap queue sets in mana_set_priv_flags Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/13] net: mana: swap queue sets in mana_change_mtu Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/13] net: mana: swap queue sets in mana_xdp_set Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/13] net: mana: do not bail out of mana_detach on dealloc failure Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/13] net: mana: keep per-queue statistics in the port context Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/13] net: mana: release EQs left idle by a channel-count reduction Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/13] net: mana: keep a user-configured RSS table across a queue rebuild Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 12/13] net: mana: keep the surviving queues when the channel count is reduced Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-01  1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 13/13] net: mana: keep the existing queues when the channel count is raised Long Li
2026-09-04  4:46   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178849721018.4131868.4122826158754695838@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ernis@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kotaranov@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shirazsaleem@microsoft.com \
    --cc=shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox