* [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print
@ 2018-01-18 12:34 Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20180118123424.21062-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2018-01-18 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe; +Cc: Leon Romanovsky, RDMA mailing list
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
The kmalloc() failure to allocate memory generates enough information
and doesn't need to be accompanied by another driver print.
Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index f282e281eff2..91688352b5d7 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@ -3345,19 +3345,17 @@ static void mlx5_ib_event(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, void *context,
struct mlx5_ib_event_work *work;
work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (work) {
- INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event);
- work->dev = dev;
- work->param = param;
- work->context = context;
- work->event = event;
-
- queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work);
+ if (!work)
return;
- }
- dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev, "%s: mlx5_dev_event: %d, with param: %lu dropped, couldn't allocate memory.\n",
- __func__, event, param);
+ INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event);
+ work->dev = dev;
+ work->param = param;
+ work->context = context;
+ work->event = event;
+
+ queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work);
+ return;
}
static int set_has_smi_cap(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
--
2.15.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20180118123424.21062-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print [not found] ` <20180118123424.21062-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> @ 2018-01-18 20:02 ` Yuval Shaia 2018-01-19 10:58 ` Leon Romanovsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Yuval Shaia @ 2018-01-18 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, RDMA mailing list On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:34:24PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > > The kmalloc() failure to allocate memory generates enough information > and doesn't need to be accompanied by another driver print. > > Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue") Didn't found it in: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma/ branch rdma-next and didn't find it. Where should i look? > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 20 +++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > index f282e281eff2..91688352b5d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > @@ -3345,19 +3345,17 @@ static void mlx5_ib_event(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, void *context, > struct mlx5_ib_event_work *work; > > work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC); > - if (work) { > - INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event); > - work->dev = dev; > - work->param = param; > - work->context = context; > - work->event = event; > - > - queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work); > + if (!work) > return; > - } > > - dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev, "%s: mlx5_dev_event: %d, with param: %lu dropped, couldn't allocate memory.\n", > - __func__, event, param); > + INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event); > + work->dev = dev; > + work->param = param; > + work->context = context; > + work->event = event; > + > + queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work); > + return; We don't really need this last "return", right? > } > > static int set_has_smi_cap(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev) > -- > 2.15.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print 2018-01-18 20:02 ` Yuval Shaia @ 2018-01-19 10:58 ` Leon Romanovsky [not found] ` <20180119105840.GA1393-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2018-01-19 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuval Shaia; +Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, RDMA mailing list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2432 bytes --] On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:34:24PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > > > > The kmalloc() failure to allocate memory generates enough information > > and doesn't need to be accompanied by another driver print. > > > > Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue") > > Didn't found it in: > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma/ > branch rdma-next and didn't find it. > Where should i look? In official place: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d69a24e036596877ce08c25ab8e63a202412fd9e > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > > --- > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 20 +++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > index f282e281eff2..91688352b5d7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > @@ -3345,19 +3345,17 @@ static void mlx5_ib_event(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, void *context, > > struct mlx5_ib_event_work *work; > > > > work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC); > > - if (work) { > > - INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event); > > - work->dev = dev; > > - work->param = param; > > - work->context = context; > > - work->event = event; > > - > > - queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work); > > + if (!work) > > return; > > - } > > > > - dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev, "%s: mlx5_dev_event: %d, with param: %lu dropped, couldn't allocate memory.\n", > > - __func__, event, param); > > + INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event); > > + work->dev = dev; > > + work->param = param; > > + work->context = context; > > + work->event = event; > > + > > + queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work); > > + return; > > We don't really need this last "return", right? Right, I'll remove it now. Thanks > > > } > > > > static int set_has_smi_cap(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev) > > -- > > 2.15.1 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20180119105840.GA1393-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print [not found] ` <20180119105840.GA1393-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2018-01-19 18:54 ` Yuval Shaia 2018-01-21 13:41 ` Leon Romanovsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Yuval Shaia @ 2018-01-19 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leon Romanovsky; +Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, RDMA mailing list > > > > > > Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue") > > > > Didn't found it in: > > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma/ > > branch rdma-next and didn't find it. > > Where should i look? > > In official place: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d69a24e036596877ce08c25ab8e63a202412fd9e I see, I thought that "rdma-next" in subject stands for branch name, apparently not. So saying rdma-next you actually refer to for-next, right? > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print 2018-01-19 18:54 ` Yuval Shaia @ 2018-01-21 13:41 ` Leon Romanovsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2018-01-21 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuval Shaia; +Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, RDMA mailing list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 835 bytes --] On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote: > > > > > > > > Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue") > > > > > > Didn't found it in: > > > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma/ > > > branch rdma-next and didn't find it. > > > Where should i look? > > > > In official place: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d69a24e036596877ce08c25ab8e63a202412fd9e > > I see, > I thought that "rdma-next" in subject stands for branch name, apparently > not. So saying rdma-next you actually refer to for-next, right? By writing "rdma-next", I mean "target", there is a need to distinguish between different submissions (net/net-next/iproute2/iproute2-next/rdma-rc/rdma-next/rdma-core). Thanks > > > > > > > [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-21 13:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-18 12:34 [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20180118123424.21062-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-18 20:02 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-01-19 10:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20180119105840.GA1393-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-19 18:54 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-01-21 13:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox