public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Fix ib_dma_max_seg_size()
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:09:17 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021140917.GB25178@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021021030.1037-2-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 07:10:27PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If dev->dma_device->params == NULL then the maximum DMA segment size is
> 64 KB. See also the dma_get_max_seg_size() implementation. This patch
> fixes the following kernel warning:
> 
> DMA-API: infiniband rxe0: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=126976] [max=65536]
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 4848 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1220 debug_dma_map_sg+0x3d9/0x450
> RIP: 0010:debug_dma_map_sg+0x3d9/0x450
> Call Trace:
>  srp_queuecommand+0x626/0x18d0 [ib_srp]
>  scsi_queue_rq+0xd02/0x13e0 [scsi_mod]
>  __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0x2b3/0x3f0
>  blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0xac/0xf0
>  blk_insert_cloned_request+0xdf/0x170
>  dm_mq_queue_rq+0x43d/0x830 [dm_mod]
>  __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0x2b3/0x3f0
>  blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0xac/0xf0
>  blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly+0xb8/0x170
>  blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x23c/0x3b0
>  blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x529/0x730
>  blk_flush_plug_list+0x21f/0x260
>  blk_mq_make_request+0x56b/0xf20
>  generic_make_request+0x196/0x660
>  submit_bio+0xae/0x290
>  blkdev_direct_IO+0x822/0x900
>  generic_file_direct_write+0x110/0x200
>  __generic_file_write_iter+0x124/0x2a0
>  blkdev_write_iter+0x168/0x270
>  aio_write+0x1c4/0x310
>  io_submit_one+0x971/0x1390
>  __x64_sys_io_submit+0x12a/0x390
>  do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x2e0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 0b5cb3300ae5 ("RDMA/srp: Increase max_segment_size")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>  include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index 6a47ba85c54c..e6c167d03aae 100644
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -4043,9 +4043,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_unmap_sg_attrs(struct ib_device *dev,
>   */
>  static inline unsigned int ib_dma_max_seg_size(struct ib_device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct device_dma_parameters *p = dev->dma_device->dma_parms;
> -
> -	return p ? p->max_segment_size : UINT_MAX;
> +	return dma_get_max_seg_size(dev->dma_device);
>  }

Should we get rid of this wrapper?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21  2:10 [PATCH 0/4] Fixes related to the DMA max_segment_size parameter Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Fix ib_dma_max_seg_size() Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21 14:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-21 15:03     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21 15:27       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 15:56         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Set DMA parameters correctly Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21 14:10   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-21 16:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21 17:44       ` Saleem, Shiraz
2019-10-21 18:10         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21 20:32           ` Saleem, Shiraz
2019-10-22 14:40           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-22 22:11             ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] rdma_rxe: Increase DMA max_segment_size parameter Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] siw: " Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  9:36   ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-21 13:53     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021140917.GB25178@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox