From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>
Cc: liweihang <liweihang@huawei.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IB_QP_CUR_STATE
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 14:01:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200712110153.GB7287@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca040bc1-e5dc-e514-ace4-8145b7946664@amazon.com>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 01:53:13PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 13:44, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:13:45AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> >> On 08/07/2020 18:44, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:42:34PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> >>>> On 08/07/2020 12:41, liweihang wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm a little confused about the role of IB_QP_CUR_STATE in the enumeration
> >>>>> ib_qp_attr_mask.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In manual page of ibv_modify_qp(), comments of cur_qp_state is "Assume this
> >>>>> is the current QP state". Why we need to get current qp state from users
> >>>>> instead of drivers?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For example, why the users are allowed to modify qp from RTR to RTS again
> >>>>> even if the qp's state in driver and hardware has already been RTS.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would be appretiate it if someone can help with this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Weihang
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Talking about IB_QP_CUR_STATE, I see many drivers filling it in their query QP
> >>>> callback although it should only be used in modify operations.. Is there a
> >>>> reason not to remove it?
> >>>
> >>> IBTA section "11.2.5.3 QUERY QUEUE PAIR" has line about IB_QP_CUR_STATE.
> >>> It is one of output modifiers.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>
> >> It says the current QP state should be returned, that's what qp_state field is used for.
> >> According to the man pages:
> >>
> >> libibverbs/man/ibv_query_qp.3:
> >> enum ibv_qp_state qp_state; /* Current QP state */
> >> enum ibv_qp_state cur_qp_state; /* Current QP state - irrelevant for ibv_query_qp */
> >
> > I don't think that users read it, because ibv_cmd_query_qp() filled
> > qp_state to be equal to cur_qp_state from day one.
>
> Where do you see that?
>
> I see:
> ibv_cmd_query_qp():
> attr->qp_state = resp.qp_state;
> attr->cur_qp_state = resp.cur_qp_state;
It comes from the the kernel as is and in the kernel:
mlx5_ib_query_qp():
4699 qp_attr->qp_state = qp->state;
4700 qp_attr->cur_qp_state = qp_attr->qp_state;
mlx4_ib_query_qp():
4049 qp->state = to_ib_qp_state(mlx4_state);
4050 qp_attr->qp_state = qp->state;
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-12 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-08 9:41 Question about IB_QP_CUR_STATE liweihang
2020-07-08 12:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-07-08 12:42 ` Gal Pressman
2020-07-08 15:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-07-09 6:13 ` Gal Pressman
2020-07-10 10:11 ` liweihang
2020-07-12 10:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-07-12 10:53 ` Gal Pressman
2020-07-12 11:01 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200712110153.GB7287@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=galpress@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox