From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] RDMA/core: remove use of dma_virt_ops
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:09:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104180912.GS36674@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104163135.GA15840@lst.de>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:31:35PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:52:55AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > It could work, I think a resonable ULP API would be to have some
> >
> > rdma_fill_ib_sge_from_sgl()
> > rdma_map_sge_single()
> > etc etc
> >
> > ie instead of wrappering the DMA API as-is we have a new API that
> > directly builds the ib_sge. It always fills the local_dma_lkey from
> > the pd, so it knows it is doing DMA from local kernel memory.
>
> Yeah.
>
> > Logically SW devices then have a local_dma_lkey MR that has an IOVA of
> > the CPU physical address space, not the DMA address space as HW
> > devices have. The ib_sge builders can know this detail and fill in
> > addr from either a cpu phyical or a dma map.
>
> I don't think the builders are the right place to do it - it really
> should to be in the low-level drivers for a bunch of reasons:
At this point we have little choice, the ULP is responsible for
map/unmap because the ULP owns the CQ and (batch) unmap is triggered
by some CQE.
Reworking all drivers to somehow keep track of unmaps a CQEs triggers
feels so hard at this point as to be impossible. It is why the
rdma_rw_ctx basically exists.
So we have to keep the current arrangment, when the ib_sge is built
the dma map must be conditionally done.
> 1) this avoids doing the dma_map when no DMA is performed, e.g. for
> mlx5 when send data is in the extended WQE
At least in the kernel, the ULP has to be involved today in
IB_SEND_INLINE. Userspace does an auto-copy, but that is because it
doesn't have dma map/unmap.
Without unmap tracking as above the caller must supply a specially
formed ib_sge when using IB_SEND_INLINE that specifies the CPU vaddr
so memcpy works.
But this all looks like dead code, no ULP sets IB_SEND_INLINE ??
> 2) to deal with the fact that dma mapping reduces the number of SGEs.
> When the system uses a modern IOMMU we'll always end up with a
> single IOVA range no matter how many pages were mapped originally.
> This means any MR process can actually be consolidated to use
> a single SGE with the local lkey.
Any place like rdma_rw_ctx_init() that decides dynamically between SGE
and MR becomes a mess. It would be manageable if rdma_rw_ctx_init()
was the only place doing this..
I haven't looked lately, but I wonder if it is feasible that all the
MR users would use this API?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 9:50 remove dma_virt_ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] RDMA/core: remove ib_dma_{alloc,free}_coherent Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] RDMA/core: remove use of dma_virt_ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 13:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-04 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 15:09 ` Bernard Metzler
2020-11-04 18:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-04 15:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-04 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-11-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI/p2p: remove the DMA_VIRT_OPS hacks Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 16:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-04 17:00 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-11-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI/p2p: cleanup up __pci_p2pdma_map_sg a bit Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 16:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-04 9:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] dma-mapping: remove dma_virt_ops Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201104180912.GS36674@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox