From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Jonathan Flynn <jonathan.flynn@hammerspace.com>
Subject: [PATCH] svcrdma: Avoid direct reclaim when allocating Read sink buffers
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:31:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605223118.75092-1-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
svc_rdma_alloc_read_pages() passes __GFP_NORETRY, which limits the
allocator to a single round of direct reclaim and asynchronous
compaction per attempt. Under memory pressure or fragmentation that
round can take a long time, and the fallback loop repeats it at
each order, multiplying the stall while the RPC waits for its Read
sink buffer.
The contiguous allocation is opportunistic: when it fails, Read
sink buffers come from the pages already in rq_pages[]. Direct
reclaim effort buys little here. Allocate with GFP_NOWAIT instead,
which omits __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM so the allocator takes pages only
from the free lists and returns NULL immediately when none are
available. GFP_NOWAIT retains __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM, so a failed
attempt still wakes kswapd to replenish higher-order pages in the
background, and it already includes __GFP_NOWARN. __GFP_NORETRY
has no effect once direct reclaim is off. skb_page_frag_refill()
takes the same approach for its opportunistic high-order
allocation.
Reported-by: Jonathan Flynn <jonathan.flynn@hammerspace.com>
Fixes: 18755b8c2f24 ("svcrdma: Use contiguous pages for RDMA Read sink buffers")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_rw.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Given the perf symbol resolution inaccuracies I can't swear this
will fix the issue, but here's a stab at it.
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_rw.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_rw.c
index 587e4cd29303..efde26cac961 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_rw.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_rw.c
@@ -746,10 +746,9 @@ int svc_rdma_prepare_reply_chunk(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
}
/*
- * Cap contiguous RDMA Read sink allocations at order-4.
- * Higher orders risk allocation failure under
- * __GFP_NORETRY, which would negate the benefit of the
- * contiguous fast path.
+ * Cap contiguous RDMA Read sink allocations at order-4. Higher orders risk
+ * allocation failure under GFP_NOWAIT, which would negate the benefit of
+ * the contiguous fast path.
*/
#define SVC_RDMA_CONTIG_MAX_ORDER 4
@@ -758,9 +757,11 @@ int svc_rdma_prepare_reply_chunk(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
* @nr_pages: number of pages needed
* @order: on success, set to the allocation order
*
- * Attempts a higher-order allocation, falling back to smaller orders.
- * The returned pages are split immediately so each sub-page has its
- * own refcount and can be freed independently.
+ * Attempts a higher-order allocation, falling back to smaller orders. The
+ * allocation is opportunistic: it takes pages only from the free lists,
+ * without direct reclaim, so it fails fast under memory pressure. The
+ * returned pages are split immediately so each sub-page has its own
+ * refcount and can be freed independently.
*
* Returns a pointer to the first page on success, or NULL if even
* order-1 allocation fails.
@@ -775,8 +776,7 @@ svc_rdma_alloc_read_pages(unsigned int nr_pages, unsigned int *order)
SVC_RDMA_CONTIG_MAX_ORDER);
while (o >= 1) {
- page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN,
- o);
+ page = alloc_pages(GFP_NOWAIT, o);
if (page) {
split_page(page, o);
*order = o;
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 22:31 Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-06-05 22:39 ` [PATCH] svcrdma: Avoid direct reclaim when allocating Read sink buffers Jonathan Flynn
2026-06-05 23:13 ` Jonathan Flynn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605223118.75092-1-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jonathan.flynn@hammerspace.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox