From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/uverbs: Make CQ handle mandatory for WQ creation
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 02:29:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911022951.59BE91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911021557.2113-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>
> UVERBS_ATTR_CREATE_WQ_CQ_HANDLE is declared UA_OPTIONAL in the ioctl
> method definition, so the mandatory attribute bitmap does not enforce
> its presence. When userspace omits it, uverbs_attr_get_obj() returns
> ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) and the handler stores that error pointer into
> wq_init_attr.cq without validation.
>
> The bogus cq pointer is then passed to the driver's create_wq callback.
> In the mlx5 case, create_rq() calls to_mcq(init_attr->cq) which applies
> container_of to the ERR_PTR value, producing a near-NULL pointer. The
> subsequent access in get_rq_ts_format() triggers a kernel NULL pointer
> dereference:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000296
> RIP: 0010:create_rq+0x32/0x550 [mlx5_ib]
> Call Trace:
> mlx5_ib_create_wq+0x14a/0x210 [mlx5_ib]
> ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_WQ_CREATE+0x1f0/0x320 [ib_uverbs]
> ib_uverbs_run_method+0x296/0x320 [ib_uverbs]
> ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x1a0/0x260 [ib_uverbs]
> ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xa8/0x120 [ib_uverbs]
>
> A WQ without a CQ was never valid; the legacy write path always required
> one via uobj_get_obj_read() in ib_uverbs_ex_create_wq(). Declare the
> attribute UA_MANDATORY so the uverbs framework rejects the ioctl early
> when the CQ handle is missing, before the handler ever runs.
>
> Fixes: ef3bc084a8ed ("IB/uverbs: Introduce create/destroy WQ commands over ioctl")
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911021557.2113-1-lirongqing@baidu.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 2:15 [PATCH v2] RDMA/uverbs: Make CQ handle mandatory for WQ creation lirongqing
2026-09-11 2:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 3:06 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2026-09-15 11:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911022951.59BE91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox