* [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns
@ 2026-09-21 3:11 lirongqing
2026-09-21 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lirongqing @ 2026-09-21 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg, Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Jenny Derzhavetz,
Nicholas Bellinger, linux-rdma, target-devel
Cc: Li RongQing
From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
isert_put_unsol_pending_cmds() declares drop_cmd_list as a static
LIST_HEAD, so the list is shared across all invocations of the function.
It is called from isert_wait_conn(), the per-connection .iscsit_wait_conn
transport callback, which runs independently for each connection during
teardown.
conn->cmd_lock only protects each connection's own conn_cmd_list, not the
shared drop_cmd_list. If two connections tear down at the same time, both
threads list_move_tail() commands into the same drop_cmd_list without any
mutual exclusion, and then both iterate and list_del/put it concurrently.
This corrupts the linked list and can double-free iscsit_cmd structures.
Make drop_cmd_list a stack-local list, matching the pattern already used
in isert_free_np().
Fixes: 3e03c4b01da3 ("iser-target: Put the reference on commands waiting for unsol data")
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
index e69db43..efa8d7b 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
@@ -2583,7 +2583,7 @@ static void
isert_put_unsol_pending_cmds(struct iscsit_conn *conn)
{
struct iscsit_cmd *cmd, *tmp;
- static LIST_HEAD(drop_cmd_list);
+ LIST_HEAD(drop_cmd_list);
spin_lock_bh(&conn->cmd_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(cmd, tmp, &conn->conn_cmd_list, i_conn_node) {
--
2.9.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns
2026-09-21 3:11 [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns lirongqing
@ 2026-09-21 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-21 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lirongqing; +Cc: linux-rdma
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>
> isert_put_unsol_pending_cmds() declares drop_cmd_list as a static
> LIST_HEAD, so the list is shared across all invocations of the function.
> It is called from isert_wait_conn(), the per-connection .iscsit_wait_conn
> transport callback, which runs independently for each connection during
> teardown.
>
> conn->cmd_lock only protects each connection's own conn_cmd_list, not the
> shared drop_cmd_list. If two connections tear down at the same time, both
> threads list_move_tail() commands into the same drop_cmd_list without any
> mutual exclusion, and then both iterate and list_del/put it concurrently.
> This corrupts the linked list and can double-free iscsit_cmd structures.
>
> Make drop_cmd_list a stack-local list, matching the pattern already used
> in isert_free_np().
>
> Fixes: 3e03c4b01da3 ("iser-target: Put the reference on commands waiting for unsol data")
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921031100.2199-1-lirongqing@baidu.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns
2026-09-21 3:11 [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns lirongqing
2026-09-21 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-09-28 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2026-09-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg, Jason Gunthorpe, Jenny Derzhavetz,
Nicholas Bellinger, linux-rdma, target-devel, lirongqing
On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:11:00 +0800, lirongqing wrote:
> isert_put_unsol_pending_cmds() declares drop_cmd_list as a static
> LIST_HEAD, so the list is shared across all invocations of the function.
> It is called from isert_wait_conn(), the per-connection .iscsit_wait_conn
> transport callback, which runs independently for each connection during
> teardown.
>
> conn->cmd_lock only protects each connection's own conn_cmd_list, not the
> shared drop_cmd_list. If two connections tear down at the same time, both
> threads list_move_tail() commands into the same drop_cmd_list without any
> mutual exclusion, and then both iterate and list_del/put it concurrently.
> This corrupts the linked list and can double-free iscsit_cmd structures.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns
https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/d30e9b1bc47bd9
Best regards,
--
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-28 19:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-21 3:11 [PATCH] IB/isert: Don't share drop_cmd_list across concurrent connection teardowns lirongqing
2026-09-21 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox