Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/13] RDMA/core: Ultra Ethernet transport verbs

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 04:57:16PM -0700, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 10/14/26 3:21 PM, Eric Davis via B4 Relay wrote:
> > Ultra Ethernet defines a reliable unconnected transport. A queue pair
> > sends to any peer in its job without a connection, incoming traffic is
> > demultiplexed on a JobID rather than on a connection, and what a device
> > orders is far weaker than IB or RoCE and varies between devices. None of
> > that has a home in the current uverbs ABI.
> > 
> > This series adds the generic half. The objects, methods, and attributes
> > any UET device implements. No driver is part of it, though two already
> > exist against this ABI. A reference device model that implements all of
> > it, and HPE's Slingshot driver implementing a large subset. That is the
> > argument for ib_core carrying this. What is device specific should come
> > from private interfaces per vendor.
> 
> I'm doing some cleanups and then will be sending our Slingshot driver
> for initial review as a dependent item on this patchset.  Look for that
> by the end of this week.

You each will give reviewd-by's for each others?

You are running sashiko locally and fixing the bugs it finds?

There are several other new drivers right now, do we need to do
another full driver review trading scheme?

> Note: I dropped linux-kernel.  Unless things have changed, they usually
> don't care too much about the rdma stuff until it's time for the merge
> window and that list is already way overloaded as it stands.

Nobody reads that list I'm sure?

Jason