Re: [PATCH net 2/2] DO-NOT-MERGE: selftest: add rxe mr_check_range() overflow reproducer

[Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>]

在 2026/8/5 0:47, gang.yan@linux.dev 写道:
>> Thank you for the clarification.
>>
>> I agree that we can drop the selftest patch. My original suggestion was mainly to make sure we have proper coverage for this issue, but after considering your explanation, I think adding a standalone selftest for this particular case may not be necessary.
>>
>> The bug fix itself is the important part, and keeping the selftest out will also avoid adding a test case that may not provide much long-term value.
> Hi Yanjun,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> No offense at all.
>
> Regarding Patch 1 (the actual fix), I noticed that it hasn't received a Reviewed-by
> or any further comments yet. As a newcomer to the RDMA community, I just want to
> make sure I'm following the right process. Should I proactively send a v2 with only
> the fix (now that the selftest is removed), or is it preferable to wait for more
> reviews on the current version before resending?
>
> Please don't take this as a nudge — I'm genuinely asking because I want to avoid
> missing any step that I should be taking on my side. I'm happy to wait if
> that's the usual practice.
Hi Gang,

I think it's fine to send a v2 with only the fix. There's no need to 
include the selftest in this series anymore.

If you'd like, you can also add the following since I have reviewed this 
commit and made tests in my local host. It can pass my local testcases.

Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>

Thanks,

Zhu Yanjun


>
> Thanks
> Gang

-- 
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu