Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pearson, Robert B" <robert.pearson2@hpe.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Md Haris Iqbal <haris.phnx@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
	"aleksei.marov@ionos.com" <aleksei.marov@ionos.com>,
	"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"haris.iqbal@ionos.com" <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>,
	"jinpu.wang@ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
	"rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: For invalidate compare keys according to the MR access
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:40:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR84MB2307EB091065A95A6972C41FBCBB9@MW4PR84MB2307.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220629183445.GV23621@ziepe.ca>


> If the rkey's and lkeys are always the same why do we store them twice in the mr ?

They are not always the same currently. If you request remote access they are the same if you don't rkey is set to zero.
You could, of course, check both the keys and the access bits but that is not the way it is written currently.

Bob



  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29 16:49 [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: For invalidate compare keys according to the MR access Md Haris Iqbal
2022-06-29 17:20 ` haris iqbal
2022-06-29 18:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-29 18:40   ` Pearson, Robert B [this message]
2022-06-29 18:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-29 18:47       ` Pearson, Robert B
2022-07-05  9:28         ` haris iqbal
2022-07-05 13:59           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-06  3:41             ` haris iqbal
2022-07-06 16:39               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-07  7:32                 ` haris iqbal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW4PR84MB2307EB091065A95A6972C41FBCBB9@MW4PR84MB2307.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=robert.pearson2@hpe.com \
    --cc=aleksei.marov@ionos.com \
    --cc=haris.iqbal@ionos.com \
    --cc=haris.phnx@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox