From: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, kuba@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] net/smc: fix SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB without smc_server_lgr_pending
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:58:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvtONMD7yodAZLia@TonyMac-Alibaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01105a98ac715b6df6d019c0b6a9916814fdcff4.1660152975.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:47:33AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> As commit "net/smc: fix unexpected SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB error cause
> by server" mentioned, it works only when all connection creations are
This is a format issue, it's better to use:
commit 4940a1fdf31c ("net/smc: fix unexpected SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB
error cause by server").
> completely protected by smc_server_lgr_pending lock, since we already
> cancel the lock, we need to re-fix the issues.
>
> Fixes: 4940a1fdf31c ("net/smc: fix unexpected SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB error cause by server")
>
^^^ This blank line is unnecessary.
> Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 ++
> net/smc/smc_core.c | 11 ++++++++---
> net/smc/smc_core.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index af4b0aa..c0842a9 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -2413,6 +2413,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (rc)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> + smc_conn_leave_rtoken_pending(new_smc, ini);
> smc_conn_save_peer_info(new_smc, cclc);
> smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc);
> SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk), ini);
> @@ -2422,6 +2423,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (ini->is_smcd)
> mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
> out_decl:
> + smc_conn_leave_rtoken_pending(new_smc, ini);
> smc_listen_decline(new_smc, rc, ini ? ini->first_contact_local : 0,
> proposal_version);
> out_free:
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> index a3338cc..61a3854 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> @@ -2190,14 +2190,19 @@ int smc_conn_create(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> lgr->vlan_id == ini->vlan_id) &&
> (role == SMC_CLNT || ini->is_smcd ||
> (lgr->conns_num < SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX &&
> - !bitmap_full(lgr->rtokens_used_mask, SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX)))) {
> + (SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX -
> + bitmap_weight(lgr->rtokens_used_mask, SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX)
> + > atomic_read(&lgr->rtoken_pendings))))) {
> /* link group found */
> ini->first_contact_local = 0;
> conn->lgr = lgr;
> rc = smc_lgr_register_conn(conn, false);
> write_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
> - if (!rc && delayed_work_pending(&lgr->free_work))
> - cancel_delayed_work(&lgr->free_work);
> + if (!rc) {
> + smc_conn_enter_rtoken_pending(smc, ini);
> + if (delayed_work_pending(&lgr->free_work))
> + cancel_delayed_work(&lgr->free_work);
> + }
> break;
> }
> write_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> index 199f533..acc2869 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> @@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ struct smc_link_group {
> struct rb_root conns_all; /* connection tree */
> rwlock_t conns_lock; /* protects conns_all */
> unsigned int conns_num; /* current # of connections */
> + atomic_t rtoken_pendings;/* number of connection that
> + * lgr assigned but no rtoken got yet
> + */
> unsigned short vlan_id; /* vlan id of link group */
>
> struct list_head sndbufs[SMC_RMBE_SIZES];/* tx buffers */
> @@ -603,6 +606,24 @@ struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
> int smcr_nl_get_link(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
> int smcd_nl_get_lgr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
>
> +static inline void smc_conn_enter_rtoken_pending(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> +{
> + struct smc_link_group *lgr;
Consider this: struct smc_link_group *lgr = smc->conn.lgr ?
> +
> + lgr = smc->conn.lgr;
> + if (lgr && !ini->first_contact_local)
> + atomic_inc(&lgr->rtoken_pendings);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void smc_conn_leave_rtoken_pending(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> +{
> + struct smc_link_group *lgr;
Ditto.
> +
> + lgr = smc->conn.lgr;
> + if (lgr && !ini->first_contact_local)
> + atomic_dec(&lgr->rtoken_pendings);
> +}
> +
> void smcr_lnk_cluster_on_lnk_state(struct smc_link *lnk);
>
> static inline struct smc_link_group *smc_get_lgr(struct smc_link *link)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 17:47 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11 11:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-16 9:43 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:47 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-16 12:52 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net/smc: fix SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB without smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-16 7:58 ` Tony Lu [this message]
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net/smc: allow confirm/delete rkey response deliver multiplex D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:17 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net/smc: make SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY run concurrently D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net/smc: llc_conf_mutex refactor, replace it with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/smc: use read semaphores to reduce unnecessary blocking in smc_buf_create() & smcr_buf_unuse() D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:24 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net/smc: replace mutex rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:37 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/smc: fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:28 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-11 5:13 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-11 12:31 ` Karsten Graul
2022-08-16 9:35 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:40 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-17 4:55 ` D. Wythe
2022-08-17 16:52 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-18 13:06 ` D. Wythe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvtONMD7yodAZLia@TonyMac-Alibaba \
--to=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox