From: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, kuba@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs()
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:24:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvtUTY3pAQJx0vcQ@TonyMac-Alibaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46f364ce7878b740e58bf44d3bed5fe23c64a260.1660152975.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:47:38AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Unlike smc_buf_create() and smcr_buf_unuse(), smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() is
> exclusive when assigned rmb_desc was not registered, although it can be
> executed in parallel when assigned rmb_desc was registered already
> and only performs read semtamics on it. Hence, we can not simply replace
> it with read semaphore.
>
> The idea here is that if the assigned rmb_desc was registered already,
> use read semaphore to protect the critical section, once the assigned
> rmb_desc was not registered, keep using keep write semaphore still
> to keep its exclusivity.
>
> Thanks to the reusable features of rmb_desc, which allows us to execute
> in parallel in most cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 51b90e2..39dbf39 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -516,10 +516,25 @@ static int smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs(struct smc_link *link,
> {
> struct smc_link_group *lgr = link->lgr;
> int i, rc = 0;
> + bool slow = false;
Consider do_slow?
Reverse Christmas tree.
>
> rc = smc_llc_flow_initiate(lgr, SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> +
> + down_read(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> + for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) {
> + if (!smc_link_active(&lgr->lnk[i]))
> + continue;
> + if (!rmb_desc->is_reg_mr[link->link_idx]) {
> + up_read(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> + goto slow_path;
> + }
> + }
> + /* mr register already */
> + goto fast_path;
> +slow_path:
> + slow = true;
> /* protect against parallel smc_llc_cli_rkey_exchange() and
> * parallel smcr_link_reg_buf()
> */
> @@ -531,7 +546,7 @@ static int smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs(struct smc_link *link,
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> }
> -
> +fast_path:
> /* exchange confirm_rkey msg with peer */
> rc = smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(link, rmb_desc);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -540,7 +555,7 @@ static int smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs(struct smc_link *link,
> }
> rmb_desc->is_conf_rkey = true;
> out:
> - up_write(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> + slow ? up_write(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex) : up_read(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> smc_llc_flow_stop(lgr, &lgr->llc_flow_lcl);
> return rc;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 17:47 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11 11:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-16 9:43 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:47 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-16 12:52 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net/smc: fix SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB without smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-16 7:58 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net/smc: allow confirm/delete rkey response deliver multiplex D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:17 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net/smc: make SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY run concurrently D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net/smc: llc_conf_mutex refactor, replace it with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/smc: use read semaphores to reduce unnecessary blocking in smc_buf_create() & smcr_buf_unuse() D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:24 ` Tony Lu [this message]
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net/smc: replace mutex rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:37 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/smc: fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:28 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-11 5:13 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-11 12:31 ` Karsten Graul
2022-08-16 9:35 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:40 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-17 4:55 ` D. Wythe
2022-08-17 16:52 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-18 13:06 ` D. Wythe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvtUTY3pAQJx0vcQ@TonyMac-Alibaba \
--to=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox