Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 13/13] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 03:32:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163554@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008031333.1142174-14-achender@kernel.org>

> The patch "net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport
> unload", earlier in this series, gave each transport its own
> connection count in t_conn_count, incremented and decremented at
> exactly the points where the global rds_conn_count is.  That leaves
> rds_conn_count with a single remaining consumer: the seed of the
> per-path workqueue names in __rds_conn_create().
> 
> Switch the name seed to t_conn_count, as UEK does, and remove
> rds_conn_count.  The numbering becomes per-transport instead of
> global, so connections of different transports can now receive the
> same seed; workqueue names carry no uniqueness requirement, and the
> seed was already reused as the count rose and fell.  Removing the
> counter also removes the rds_conn_lock round-trip that
> rds_conn_destroy_fini() took solely to decrement it.  (The free path
> still sleeps in destroy_workqueue(), so the last reference has to be
> dropped from process context as before; only that one lock goes.)
> 
> Based on the Oracle UEK commit "net/rds: Each RDS transport
> should keep its own connection count".
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude-Code:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008031333.1142174-1-achender@kernel.org?part=13


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  3:13 [PATCH net-next v9 00/13] net/rds: make connection lifetime reference-counted Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 01/13] net/rds: ib: don't enable interrupts in rds_ib_conn_free() Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 02/13] net/rds: undo conn_alloc() the same way on every __rds_conn_create() exit Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 03/13] net/rds: ib: refuse to attach a connection to a device being removed Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 04/13] net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with rds_destroy_pending() Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 05/13] net/rds: make rds_destroy_pending() report a connection's own destroy Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 06/13] net/rds: split connection destroy into quiesce and kref-governed free Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 07/13] net/rds: unlink transport nodes before a possibly deferred connection free Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 08/13] net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport unload Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 09/13] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 10/13] net/rds: take cp_lock to purge cp_send_queue in the quiesce Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 11/13] net/rds: hold connection references in lookup, sockets and c_passive Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 12/13] net/rds: pin the connection across RDMA-CM event handling Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  3:13 ` [PATCH net-next v9 13/13] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count Allison Henderson
2026-10-08  3:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163554@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=achender@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox