* [PATCH] rpmsg: char: take ept_lock in the SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl
@ 2026-10-26 10:03 Yu Zhang
2026-10-30 17:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yu Zhang @ 2026-10-26 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, stable, Yu Zhang
rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl() handles RPMSG_SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL by calling
rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, ...) without holding eptdev->ept_lock
and without checking eptdev->ept for NULL. rpmsg_set_flow_control()
dereferences ept->ops, so this is the only eptdev->ept user that does not
honour the ept_lock discipline.
eptdev->ept is torn down under ept_lock: rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy()
(reached via RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL on a second fd, or when the rpmsg
device is removed) and rpmsg_eptdev_release() both do
mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
rpmsg_destroy_ept(eptdev->ept);
eptdev->ept = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
and rpmsg_destroy_ept() drops the endpoint's last reference and frees it.
A SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl running concurrently can therefore read
eptdev->ept just as it is freed and dereference ept->ops -> use-after-free
(or a NULL dereference once ept has been cleared).
The other eptdev->ept users get this right: rpmsg_eptdev_write_iter() and
rpmsg_eptdev_poll() take ept_lock and re-check eptdev->ept before use. Do
the same in the ioctl. Lock only this case: RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL calls
rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(), which takes ept_lock itself, so the switch
as a whole must not hold it.
Fixes: 5550201c0fe2 ("rpmsg: char: Add RPMSG GET/SET FLOWCONTROL IOCTL support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
---
drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
index 550fda2..49c0784 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
@@ -343,7 +343,15 @@ static long rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
break;
}
set = !!arg;
- ret = rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, set, eptdev->chinfo.dst);
+ ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&eptdev->ept_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ if (eptdev->ept)
+ ret = rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, set,
+ eptdev->chinfo.dst);
+ else
+ ret = -EPIPE;
+ mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
break;
case RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL:
/* Don't allow to destroy a default endpoint. */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: char: take ept_lock in the SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl
2026-10-26 10:03 [PATCH] rpmsg: char: take ept_lock in the SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl Yu Zhang
@ 2026-10-30 17:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-10-30 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Zhang; +Cc: Bjorn Andersson, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, stable
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 08:03:06PM +1000, Yu Zhang wrote:
> rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl() handles RPMSG_SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL by calling
> rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, ...) without holding eptdev->ept_lock
> and without checking eptdev->ept for NULL. rpmsg_set_flow_control()
> dereferences ept->ops, so this is the only eptdev->ept user that does not
> honour the ept_lock discipline.
>
> eptdev->ept is torn down under ept_lock: rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy()
> (reached via RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL on a second fd, or when the rpmsg
> device is removed) and rpmsg_eptdev_release() both do
>
> mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
> rpmsg_destroy_ept(eptdev->ept);
> eptdev->ept = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
>
> and rpmsg_destroy_ept() drops the endpoint's last reference and frees it.
> A SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl running concurrently can therefore read
> eptdev->ept just as it is freed and dereference ept->ops -> use-after-free
> (or a NULL dereference once ept has been cleared).
>
> The other eptdev->ept users get this right: rpmsg_eptdev_write_iter() and
> rpmsg_eptdev_poll() take ept_lock and re-check eptdev->ept before use. Do
> the same in the ioctl. Lock only this case: RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL calls
> rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(), which takes ept_lock itself, so the switch
> as a whole must not hold it.
Please get rid of the above paragraph.
>
> Fixes: 5550201c0fe2 ("rpmsg: char: Add RPMSG GET/SET FLOWCONTROL IOCTL support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index 550fda2..49c0784 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,15 @@ static long rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> break;
> }
> set = !!arg;
> - ret = rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, set, eptdev->chinfo.dst);
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&eptdev->ept_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + if (eptdev->ept)
> + ret = rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, set,
> + eptdev->chinfo.dst);
> + else
> + ret = -EPIPE;
> + mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&eptdev->ept_lock);
if (ret)
break;
if (!eptdev->ept) {
ret = -EPIEP;
break;
}
ret = rpmsg_set_flow_control(eptdev->ept, set,
eptdev->chinfo.dst);
mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock);
Thanks,
Mathieu
> break;
> case RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL:
> /* Don't allow to destroy a default endpoint. */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-30 17:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-26 10:03 [PATCH] rpmsg: char: take ept_lock in the SET_INCOMING_FLOWCONTROL ioctl Yu Zhang
2026-10-30 17:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox