* [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI
@ 2022-10-18 18:18 Randy Dunlap
2022-11-03 6:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-11-09 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-10-18 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Tomi Valkeinen, Laurent Pinchart, Kieran Bingham,
LUU HOAI, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter
When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls
from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker
errors.
Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the
build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the
RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic
kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always
be enabled.
aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable':
rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable'
aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable':
rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable'
Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU
depends on DRM && OF
depends on ARM || ARM64
depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n
select DRM_KMS_HELPER
select DRM_GEM_DMA_HELPER
select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-10-18 18:18 [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-03 6:06 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 10:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-09 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-03 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Tomi Valkeinen, Laurent Pinchart, Kieran Bingham, LUU HOAI, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter ping. I have verified (on linux-next-20221103) that this is still needed. Thanks. On 10/18/22 11:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: > When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls > from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker > errors. > Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the > build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the > RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic > kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always > be enabled. > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' > > Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU > depends on DRM && OF > depends on ARM || ARM64 > depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n > select DRM_KMS_HELPER > select DRM_GEM_DMA_HELPER > select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 6:06 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-03 10:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Kieran Bingham @ 2022-11-03 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap, linux-kernel Cc: Tomi Valkeinen, Laurent Pinchart, LUU HOAI, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter Hi Randy, Quoting Randy Dunlap (2022-11-03 06:06:45) > ping. I have verified (on linux-next-20221103) that this is still needed. > Thanks. > > On 10/18/22 11:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls > > from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker > > errors. > > Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the > > build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the > > RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic > > kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always > > be enabled. > > > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' > > > > Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU > > depends on DRM && OF > > depends on ARM || ARM64 > > depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > > + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't understand how this works. Could you explain what this is doing please? I know you've explained above that it fixes it to optionally depend on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI ... but it's not making sense to me. To me - this is saying we depend on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI being enabled, or not being enabled ... ? Which is like saying if (0 || 1) ? I'm guessing I'm missing something obvious :-S -- Kieran > > select DRM_KMS_HELPER > > select DRM_GEM_DMA_HELPER > > select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS > > -- > ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 10:59 ` Kieran Bingham @ 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Javier Martinez Canillas @ 2022-11-03 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kieran Bingham, Randy Dunlap, linux-kernel Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, Tomi Valkeinen, LUU HOAI Hello Kieran, On 11/3/22 11:59, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Randy, > > Quoting Randy Dunlap (2022-11-03 06:06:45) >> ping. I have verified (on linux-next-20221103) that this is still needed. >> Thanks. >> >> On 10/18/22 11:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls >>> from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker >>> errors. >>> Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the >>> build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the >>> RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic >>> kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always >>> be enabled. >>> >>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': >>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' >>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': >>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' >>> >>> Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>> Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>> Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> >>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU >>> depends on DRM && OF >>> depends on ARM || ARM64 >>> depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST >>> + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n > > Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't understand how this works. > Could you explain what this is doing please? > > I know you've explained above that it fixes it to optionally depend on > DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI ... but it's not making sense to me. > > To me - this is saying we depend on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI being enabled, or > not being enabled ... ? Which is like saying if (0 || 1) ? > > I'm guessing I'm missing something obvious :-S > What this Kconfig expression is saying is that it depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y if DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m if DRM_RCAR_DU=m. But that the it can also be satisfied if is not set DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI. This is usually used to make sure that you don't end with a configuration where DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y and DRM_RCAR_DU=m or DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m and DRM_RCAR_DU=y. Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following: depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas @ 2022-11-03 11:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-03 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Javier Martinez Canillas @ 2022-11-03 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kieran Bingham, Randy Dunlap, linux-kernel Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, Tomi Valkeinen, LUU HOAI On 11/3/22 12:53, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [...] >> > > What this Kconfig expression is saying is that it depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y > if DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m if DRM_RCAR_DU=m. But that the it can It should had been s/and/or here but you get the idea. > also be satisfied if is not set DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI. > > This is usually used to make sure that you don't end with a configuration where > DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y and DRM_RCAR_DU=m or DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m and DRM_RCAR_DU=y. > > Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following: > > depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI > -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas @ 2022-11-03 11:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-03 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Kieran Bingham @ 2022-11-03 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Javier Martinez Canillas, Randy Dunlap, linux-kernel Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, Tomi Valkeinen, LUU HOAI Quoting Javier Martinez Canillas (2022-11-03 11:53:14) > Hello Kieran, > > On 11/3/22 11:59, Kieran Bingham wrote: > > Hi Randy, > > > > Quoting Randy Dunlap (2022-11-03 06:06:45) > >> ping. I have verified (on linux-next-20221103) that this is still needed. > >> Thanks. > >> > >> On 10/18/22 11:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>> When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls > >>> from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker > >>> errors. > >>> Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the > >>> build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the > >>> RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic > >>> kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always > >>> be enabled. > >>> > >>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > >>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' > >>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > >>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' > >>> > >>> Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") > >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > >>> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >>> Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >>> Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> > >>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > >>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > >>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > >>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > >>> diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > >>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU > >>> depends on DRM && OF > >>> depends on ARM || ARM64 > >>> depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > >>> + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n > > > > Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't understand how this works. > > Could you explain what this is doing please? > > > > I know you've explained above that it fixes it to optionally depend on > > DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI ... but it's not making sense to me. > > > > To me - this is saying we depend on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI being enabled, or > > not being enabled ... ? Which is like saying if (0 || 1) ? > > > > I'm guessing I'm missing something obvious :-S > > > > What this Kconfig expression is saying is that it depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y > if DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m if DRM_RCAR_DU=m. But that the it can > also be satisfied if is not set DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI. > > This is usually used to make sure that you don't end with a configuration where > DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y and DRM_RCAR_DU=m or DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m and DRM_RCAR_DU=y. > > Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following: > > depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI Ok - thanks, so it's the module part that breaks. I never build modules, always builtin - so it doesn't hit me ;-) Anyway - it certainly makes sense now I think so either as posted, or with the idiomatic proposal from Javier: Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > -- > Best regards, > > Javier Martinez Canillas > Core Platforms > Red Hat > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:59 ` Kieran Bingham @ 2022-11-03 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 18:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-03 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Javier Martinez Canillas, Kieran Bingham, linux-kernel Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, Tomi Valkeinen, LUU HOAI Hi, On 11/3/22 04:53, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Kieran, > > On 11/3/22 11:59, Kieran Bingham wrote: >> Hi Randy, >> >> Quoting Randy Dunlap (2022-11-03 06:06:45) >>> ping. I have verified (on linux-next-20221103) that this is still needed. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On 10/18/22 11:18, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls >>>> from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker >>>> errors. >>>> Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the >>>> build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the >>>> RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic >>>> kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always >>>> be enabled. >>>> >>>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': >>>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' >>>> aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': >>>> rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' >>>> >>>> Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>>> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>> Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>> Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> >>>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org >>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig >>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU >>>> depends on DRM && OF >>>> depends on ARM || ARM64 >>>> depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST >>>> + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n >> >> Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't understand how this works. >> Could you explain what this is doing please? >> >> I know you've explained above that it fixes it to optionally depend on >> DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI ... but it's not making sense to me. >> >> To me - this is saying we depend on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI being enabled, or >> not being enabled ... ? Which is like saying if (0 || 1) ? >> >> I'm guessing I'm missing something obvious :-S It's kconfig tristate symbols (y/n/m), not boolean. :) > What this Kconfig expression is saying is that it depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y > if DRM_RCAR_DU=y and DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m if DRM_RCAR_DU=m. But that the it can > also be satisfied if is not set DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI. > > This is usually used to make sure that you don't end with a configuration where > DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=y and DRM_RCAR_DU=m or DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m and DRM_RCAR_DU=y. > > Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following: > > depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI I count just over 200 of each idiom (but my grep strings could be too crude). I guess that you want a v2 with that change? Thanks. -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-11-03 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-03 18:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Javier Martinez Canillas @ 2022-11-03 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap, Kieran Bingham, linux-kernel Cc: linux-renesas-soc, Laurent Pinchart, LUU HOAI, dri-devel, Tomi Valkeinen On 11/3/22 17:26, Randy Dunlap wrote: [...] >> >> Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following: >> >> depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI > > I count just over 200 of each idiom (but my grep strings could be > too crude). I guess that you want a v2 with that change? > I believe Kieran was happy with either so no objections from me. I don't have a strong opinion, I just thought the latter was more idiomatic but you said that both are used alike. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI 2022-10-18 18:18 [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 6:06 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2022-11-09 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2022-11-09 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kernel, Tomi Valkeinen, Kieran Bingham, LUU HOAI, dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter Hi Randy, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:18:28AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > When CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=y and CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=m, calls > from the builtin driver to the mipi driver fail due to linker > errors. > Since the RCAR_MIPI_DSI driver is not always required, fix the > build error by making DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depend on the > RCAR_MIPI_DSI Kconfig symbol. This prevents the problematic > kconfig combination without requiring that RCAR_MIPI_DSI always > be enabled. > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x3a18): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_enable' > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.o: in function `rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable': > rcar_du_crtc.c:(.text+0x47cc): undefined reference to `rcar_mipi_dsi_pclk_disable' I've already posted a fix, see https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20221001220342.5828-1-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com/ It aligns with how the LVDS encoder driver is handled, so I would prefer that. I will send a pull request shortly, as a v6.1 fix. > Fixes: 957fe62d7d15 ("drm: rcar-du: Fix DSI enable & disable sequence") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@renesas.com> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU > depends on DRM && OF > depends on ARM || ARM64 > depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI=n > select DRM_KMS_HELPER > select DRM_GEM_DMA_HELPER > select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-09 14:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-10-18 18:18 [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on RCAR_MIPI_DSI Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 6:06 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 10:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-03 11:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-03 11:59 ` Kieran Bingham 2022-11-03 16:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-11-03 18:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2022-11-09 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox