From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>, Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add missing dma_descriptor_unmap()
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 15:38:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asjuOagHYZUsgg7D@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asizUWUuEdkyKodN@parshuram>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
> > > This is easy to fix. If we can agree on switching unmapping before
> > > cookie completion, I can update this patch and then send a series to fix
> > > other drivers, too.
> >
> > I agree with changing {cookie -> unmap}** to {unmap -> cookie} in this patch.
> > It looks like an improvement, I don't see any obvious downside to doing so.
> >
> > Many drivers do {cookie -> unmap}, so it may be worth making the same change
> > there too. I haven't found a specific reason for that order in the history I
> > checked, but I'd also like to hear Frank's thoughts.
>
> I cna chime in. I think Shashiko is correct here. We should ideally
> unmap first and then call complete. This would ensure anyone seeing the
> completion would get the right data buffer and chances of stale data are
> eliminated.
>
> So Wolfram, can you please reverse the order.
> Also, lets document this.
Thanks for chiming in, Vinod. It seems we have consensus now, so I will
work on such a series next week. Thank you, everyone!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 7:12 [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: collection of small missed fixes Wolfram Sang
2026-09-17 7:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Fix PM usage counter imbalance Wolfram Sang
2026-09-17 7:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-17 7:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add missing dma_descriptor_unmap() Wolfram Sang
2026-09-17 7:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-17 8:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-17 16:39 ` Frank Li
2026-09-18 13:07 ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-27 12:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-27 13:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-29 4:13 ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-09 9:26 ` Vinod Koul
2026-10-09 13:38 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-10-09 9:23 ` Vinod Koul
2026-09-27 12:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-17 7:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Remove redundant dev_err()/dev_err_probe() Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asjuOagHYZUsgg7D@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox