* [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
[not found] <87604mhrnb.fsf@xmission.com>
@ 2018-04-20 14:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-23 19:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2018-04-20 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-riscv
Filling in struct siginfo before calling force_sig_info a tedious and
error prone process, where once in a great while the wrong fields
are filled out, and siginfo has been inconsistently cleared.
Simplify this process by using the helper force_sig_fault. Which
takes as a parameters all of the information it needs, ensures
all of the fiddly bits of filling in struct siginfo are done properly
and then calls force_sig_info.
In short about a 5 line reduction in code for every time force_sig_info
is called, which makes the calling function clearer.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index 48aa6471cede..3087940008f4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -66,14 +66,7 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
static inline void do_trap_siginfo(int signo, int code,
unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- siginfo_t info;
-
- clear_siginfo(&info);
- info.si_signo = signo;
- info.si_errno = 0;
- info.si_code = code;
- info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
- force_sig_info(signo, &info, tsk);
+ force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
}
void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
2018-04-20 14:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
@ 2018-04-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 15:31 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 23/22] signal/riscv: Replace do_trap_siginfo with force_sig_fault Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-23 19:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Palmer Dabbelt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-04-21 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-riscv
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:38:03AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Filling in struct siginfo before calling force_sig_info a tedious and
> error prone process, where once in a great while the wrong fields
> are filled out, and siginfo has been inconsistently cleared.
>
> Simplify this process by using the helper force_sig_fault. Which
> takes as a parameters all of the information it needs, ensures
> all of the fiddly bits of filling in struct siginfo are done properly
> and then calls force_sig_info.
>
> In short about a 5 line reduction in code for every time force_sig_info
> is called, which makes the calling function clearer.
>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
> Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 48aa6471cede..3087940008f4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -66,14 +66,7 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
> static inline void do_trap_siginfo(int signo, int code,
> unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - siginfo_t info;
> -
> - clear_siginfo(&info);
> - info.si_signo = signo;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = code;
> - info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
> - force_sig_info(signo, &info, tsk);
> + force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
> }
Please kill the do_trap_siginfo helper and use force_sig_fault
directly in both callers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
2018-04-20 14:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-04-23 19:11 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-04-24 15:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2018-04-23 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-riscv
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 07:38:03 PDT (-0700), ebiederm at xmission.com wrote:
> Filling in struct siginfo before calling force_sig_info a tedious and
> error prone process, where once in a great while the wrong fields
> are filled out, and siginfo has been inconsistently cleared.
>
> Simplify this process by using the helper force_sig_fault. Which
> takes as a parameters all of the information it needs, ensures
> all of the fiddly bits of filling in struct siginfo are done properly
> and then calls force_sig_info.
>
> In short about a 5 line reduction in code for every time force_sig_info
> is called, which makes the calling function clearer.
>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
> Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 48aa6471cede..3087940008f4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -66,14 +66,7 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
> static inline void do_trap_siginfo(int signo, int code,
> unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - siginfo_t info;
> -
> - clear_siginfo(&info);
> - info.si_signo = signo;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = code;
> - info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
> - force_sig_info(signo, &info, tsk);
> + force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
> }
>
> void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
If I understand this correctly, any change in behavior this causes would have
been a bug on our end not filling out siginfo correctly? In that case then
feel free to add an
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
2018-04-23 19:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2018-04-24 15:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2018-04-24 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-riscv
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> writes:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 07:38:03 PDT (-0700), ebiederm at xmission.com wrote:
>> Filling in struct siginfo before calling force_sig_info a tedious and
>> error prone process, where once in a great while the wrong fields
>> are filled out, and siginfo has been inconsistently cleared.
>>
>> Simplify this process by using the helper force_sig_fault. Which
>> takes as a parameters all of the information it needs, ensures
>> all of the fiddly bits of filling in struct siginfo are done properly
>> and then calls force_sig_info.
>>
>> In short about a 5 line reduction in code for every time force_sig_info
>> is called, which makes the calling function clearer.
>>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
>> Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
>> Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 9 +--------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> index 48aa6471cede..3087940008f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -66,14 +66,7 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
>> static inline void do_trap_siginfo(int signo, int code,
>> unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
>> {
>> - siginfo_t info;
>> -
>> - clear_siginfo(&info);
>> - info.si_signo = signo;
>> - info.si_errno = 0;
>> - info.si_code = code;
>> - info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
>> - force_sig_info(signo, &info, tsk);
>> + force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
>> }
>>
>> void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
>
> If I understand this correctly, any change in behavior this causes would have
> been a bug on our end not filling out siginfo correctly? In that case then feel
> free to add an
If this change above causes any user visible changes it is a bug.
As Christoph rightly pointed out force_sig_fault is simply the arch
generic version of do_trap_siginfo.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVIEW][PATCH 23/22] signal/riscv: Replace do_trap_siginfo with force_sig_fault
2018-04-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-04-24 15:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2018-04-24 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-riscv
The function force_sig_fault is just the generic version of
do_trap_siginfo with a (void __user *) instead of an unsigned long
parameter for the address.
So just use force_sig_fault to simplify the code.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index 3087940008f4..b99d9dd21fd0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -63,12 +63,6 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
do_exit(SIGSEGV);
}
-static inline void do_trap_siginfo(int signo, int code,
- unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
-}
-
void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
unsigned long addr, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
@@ -81,7 +75,7 @@ void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
show_regs(regs);
}
- do_trap_siginfo(signo, code, addr, tsk);
+ force_sig_fault(signo, code, (void __user *)addr, tsk);
}
static void do_trap_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int code,
@@ -143,7 +137,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_trap_break(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
- do_trap_siginfo(SIGTRAP, TRAP_BRKPT, regs->sepc, current);
+ force_sig_fault(SIGTRAP, TRAP_BRKPT, (void __user *)(regs->sepc), current);
regs->sepc += 0x4;
}
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-24 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87604mhrnb.fsf@xmission.com>
2018-04-20 14:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-21 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-24 15:31 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 23/22] signal/riscv: Replace do_trap_siginfo with force_sig_fault Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-23 19:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/22] signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Palmer Dabbelt
2018-04-24 15:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox