* [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL @ 2023-12-20 10:34 Yunhui Cui 2023-12-20 21:14 ` Alexandre Ghiti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Yunhui Cui @ 2023-12-20 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, ajones, alexghiti, anup, samitolvanen, rppt, panqinglin2020, cuiyunhui, linux-riscv, linux-kernel opitmize the kernel_mapping_pa_to_va() and kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(). Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> --- arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h index 5488ecc337b6..0d2b479d02cd 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ struct kernel_mapping { unsigned long va_pa_offset; /* Offset between kernel mapping virtual address and kernel load address */ unsigned long va_kernel_pa_offset; - unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL + unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; uintptr_t xiprom; uintptr_t xiprom_sz; #endif @@ -134,12 +134,25 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base; #else void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); #endif -#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) ({ \ - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < phys_ram_base) ? \ - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET); \ - }) + +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ + (((unsigned long)(y) < phys_ram_base) ? \ + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) + +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ + (((unsigned long)(y) < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET)) +#else +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ + ((void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) + +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET) +#endif + #define __pa_to_va_nodebug(x) linear_mapping_pa_to_va(x) #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL @@ -147,12 +160,6 @@ void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); #else phys_addr_t linear_mapping_va_to_pa(unsigned long x); #endif -#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({ \ - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET); \ - }) #define __va_to_pa_nodebug(x) ({ \ unsigned long _x = x; \ -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL 2023-12-20 10:34 [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL Yunhui Cui @ 2023-12-20 21:14 ` Alexandre Ghiti 2023-12-20 22:34 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Ghiti @ 2023-12-20 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yunhui Cui, paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, ajones, alexghiti, anup, samitolvanen, rppt, panqinglin2020, linux-riscv, linux-kernel Hi Yunhui, On 20/12/2023 11:34, Yunhui Cui wrote: > opitmize the kernel_mapping_pa_to_va() and kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(). > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > index 5488ecc337b6..0d2b479d02cd 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ struct kernel_mapping { > unsigned long va_pa_offset; > /* Offset between kernel mapping virtual address and kernel load address */ > unsigned long va_kernel_pa_offset; > - unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > + unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > uintptr_t xiprom; > uintptr_t xiprom_sz; > #endif > @@ -134,12 +134,25 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base; > #else > void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > #endif > -#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) ({ \ > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < phys_ram_base) ? \ > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET); \ > - }) > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > + (((unsigned long)(y) < phys_ram_base) ? \ > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > + > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > + (((unsigned long)(y) < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET)) > +#else > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > + ((void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > + > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET) > +#endif > + > #define __pa_to_va_nodebug(x) linear_mapping_pa_to_va(x) > > #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL > @@ -147,12 +160,6 @@ void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > #else > phys_addr_t linear_mapping_va_to_pa(unsigned long x); > #endif > -#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({ \ > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET); \ > - }) > > #define __va_to_pa_nodebug(x) ({ \ > unsigned long _x = x; \ Not sure using #ifdef optimizes anything since the compiler should do the same with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) and it does not really improve the readability of this file which is already overloaded with #ifdef, so I don't think this change is needed. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL 2023-12-20 21:14 ` Alexandre Ghiti @ 2023-12-20 22:34 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-21 1:51 ` [External] " yunhui cui 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Ghiti Cc: Yunhui Cui, paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, ajones, alexghiti, anup, samitolvanen, rppt, panqinglin2020, linux-riscv, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3535 bytes --] On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:14:59PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > Hi Yunhui, > > On 20/12/2023 11:34, Yunhui Cui wrote: > > opitmize the kernel_mapping_pa_to_va() and kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > index 5488ecc337b6..0d2b479d02cd 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ struct kernel_mapping { > > unsigned long va_pa_offset; > > /* Offset between kernel mapping virtual address and kernel load address */ > > unsigned long va_kernel_pa_offset; > > - unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > > #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > > + unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > > uintptr_t xiprom; > > uintptr_t xiprom_sz; > > #endif > > @@ -134,12 +134,25 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base; > > #else > > void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > > #endif > > -#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) ({ \ > > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < phys_ram_base) ? \ > > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET); \ > > - }) > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > > + (((unsigned long)(y) < phys_ram_base) ? \ > > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > > + > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > > + (((unsigned long)(y) < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET)) > > +#else > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > > + ((void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > > + > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET) > > +#endif > > + > > #define __pa_to_va_nodebug(x) linear_mapping_pa_to_va(x) > > #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL > > @@ -147,12 +160,6 @@ void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > > #else > > phys_addr_t linear_mapping_va_to_pa(unsigned long x); > > #endif > > -#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({ \ > > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET); \ > > - }) > > #define __va_to_pa_nodebug(x) ({ \ > > unsigned long _x = x; \ > > > Not sure using #ifdef optimizes anything since the compiler should do the > same with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) and it does not really improve > the readability of this file which is already overloaded with #ifdef, so I > don't think this change is needed. I would say that we explicitly do not want to move things that are guarded by IS_ENABLED() to ifdeffery. In fact, we should move things in the other direction if possible, especially for stuff like XIP_KERNEL that nobody ever build tests. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL 2023-12-20 22:34 ` Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-21 1:51 ` yunhui cui 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: yunhui cui @ 2023-12-21 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Alexandre Ghiti, paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, ajones, alexghiti, anup, samitolvanen, rppt, panqinglin2020, linux-riscv, linux-kernel Hi Conor，Alex On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 6:35 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:14:59PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > Hi Yunhui, > > > > On 20/12/2023 11:34, Yunhui Cui wrote: > > > opitmize the kernel_mapping_pa_to_va() and kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > > index 5488ecc337b6..0d2b479d02cd 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h > > > @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ struct kernel_mapping { > > > unsigned long va_pa_offset; > > > /* Offset between kernel mapping virtual address and kernel load address */ > > > unsigned long va_kernel_pa_offset; > > > - unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > > > #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > > > + unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset; > > > uintptr_t xiprom; > > > uintptr_t xiprom_sz; > > > #endif > > > @@ -134,12 +134,25 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base; > > > #else > > > void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > > > #endif > > > -#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) ({ \ > > > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > > > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < phys_ram_base) ? \ > > > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > > - (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET); \ > > > - }) > > > + > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL > > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > > > + (((unsigned long)(y) < phys_ram_base) ? \ > > > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > > + (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > > > + > > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > > > + (((unsigned long)(y) < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET)) > > > +#else > > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) \ > > > + ((void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET)) > > > + > > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) \ > > > + ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET) > > > +#endif > > > + > > > #define __pa_to_va_nodebug(x) linear_mapping_pa_to_va(x) > > > #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL > > > @@ -147,12 +160,6 @@ void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x); > > > #else > > > phys_addr_t linear_mapping_va_to_pa(unsigned long x); > > > #endif > > > -#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({ \ > > > - unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y); \ > > > - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \ > > > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) : \ > > > - (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET); \ > > > - }) > > > #define __va_to_pa_nodebug(x) ({ \ > > > unsigned long _x = x; \ > > > > > > Not sure using #ifdef optimizes anything since the compiler should do the > > same with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) and it does not really improve > > the readability of this file which is already overloaded with #ifdef, so I > > don't think this change is needed. > > I would say that we explicitly do not want to move things that are > guarded by IS_ENABLED() to ifdeffery. In fact, we should move things in > the other direction if possible, especially for stuff like XIP_KERNEL > that nobody ever build tests. The point of this patch is that logically, like xiprom and xiprom_sz, stuct kernel_mapping.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset should be included in CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL. I believe we can agree on this, right? Thanks, Yunhui _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-21 1:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-12-20 10:34 [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL Yunhui Cui 2023-12-20 21:14 ` Alexandre Ghiti 2023-12-20 22:34 ` Conor Dooley 2023-12-21 1:51 ` [External] " yunhui cui
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox