From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: conor@kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@microchip.com>,
Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: report device on which timeout occured instead of which controller
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:15:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422-apricot-wok-76d22d53d5fc@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422-foe-strength-a5d8ad650ef4@spud>
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
When prepare_message callbacks fail, the SPI core already reports which
controller the failure happened on. The corresponding code in the mem_ops
portion of the driver already reports the device a timeout occurred on,
so make the regular part of the driver do the same.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core-qspi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core-qspi.c
index d39b04f9b6b38..629f785bd230b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core-qspi.c
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int mchp_coreqspi_prepare_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi
ret = mchp_coreqspi_wait_for_ready(qspi);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&qspi->op_lock);
- dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Timeout waiting on QSPI ready.\n");
+ dev_err(&m->spi->dev, "Timeout waiting on QSPI ready.\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.53.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 15:15 [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: control built-in cs manually Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: don't attempt to transmit during emulated read-only dual/quad operations Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: remove an unused define Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:15 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] spi: microchip-core-qspi: remove some inline markings Conor Dooley
2026-04-22 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup Mark Brown
2026-04-22 16:12 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260422-apricot-wok-76d22d53d5fc@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=cyril.jean@microchip.com \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox