* [PATCH v2] riscv: cif: reduce shadow stack size limit from 4GB to 2GB
@ 2026-04-28 2:41 Zong Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Zong Li @ 2026-04-28 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pjw, palmer, aou, alex, debug, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
david.laight.linux
Cc: Zong Li
Follow the ARM64 GCS (Guarded Control Stack) implementation approach
by reducing the shadow stack size allocation from min(RLIMIT_STACK, 4GB)
to min(RLIMIT_STACK/2, 2GB). see commit '506496bcbb42 "arm64/gcs: Ensure
that new threads have a GCS")'
Rationale:
1. Shadow stacks only store return addresses (8 bytes per entry), not
local variables, function parameters, or saved registers. A 2GB
shadow stack is far more than sufficient for any practical
application, even with extremely deep recursion. Using half the size
maintains adequate while being more resource-efficient margin
2. On memory-constrained systems (e.g., platforms with only 4GB of
physical memory, which is a common configuration), allocating 4GB
of virtual address space for shadow stack per process/thread can
lead to virtual memory allocation failures when the overcommit mode
is set to OVERCOMMIT_GUESS or OVERCOMMIT_NEVER:
Error: "__vm_enough_memory: not enough memory for the allocation"
This reduces virtual address space consumption by 50% while maintaining
more than adequate space for return address storage.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
---
Changed in v1:
- Use min() instead of min_t(). Suggested by David Laight
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
index 6eaa0d94fdfe..cbfb4e495e9f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -109,15 +109,16 @@ void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task, bool lock)
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked = lock;
}
/*
- * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as
- * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
+ * The shadow stack only stores the return address and not any variables
+ * this should be more than sufficient for most applications.
+ * Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
*/
static unsigned long calc_shstk_size(unsigned long size)
{
if (size)
return PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- return PAGE_ALIGN(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G));
+ return PAGE_ALIGN(min(rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK) / 2, SZ_2G));
}
/*
--
2.43.7
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-04-28 2:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-28 2:41 [PATCH v2] riscv: cif: reduce shadow stack size limit from 4GB to 2GB Zong Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox