From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] riscv: Introduce per cpu based local timer interrupt
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c65bc1b-a64c-e93c-84e6-5a576617f64f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <028fb362-0f4e-25b5-b707-7cc3653cbc05@wdc.com>
On 03/07/18 19:28, Atish Patra wrote:
> On 7/2/18 1:32 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 29/06/18 19:01, Atish Patra wrote:
>>> Currently, ther timer interrupt handleri(riscv_timer_interrupt())
>>> is invoked directly from the arch handler. This
>>> approach creates interwinding of driver and architecture
>>> code which is not ideal.
>>>
>>> Register timer interrupt as a per cpu based irq behind
>>> generic Linux IRQ infrastructure. As the local timer node
>>> is directly connected to individual harts, HLIC acts as
>>> the parent irq domain.
>>>
>>> This patch requires necessary bbl changes that adds timer
>>> node in device tree which can be found here.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-pk/pull/112
>>>
>>> Before the patch
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
>>> 21: 12 8 6 5 riscv,plic0,c000000 53 eth0
>>> 37: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 32 xilinx-pcie
>>> 43: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 4 10010000.serial
>>> 44: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 5 10011000.serial
>>> 45: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 51 10040000.spi
>>> 46: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 52 10041000.spi
>>> 47: 25 1 26 50 riscv,plic0,c000000 6 10050000.spi
>>>
>>> After the patch
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
>>> 5: 271 0 0 0 riscv,cpu_intc,1 5 local_timer
>>> 6: 0 307 0 0 riscv,cpu_intc,2 5 local_timer
>>> 7: 0 0 303 0 riscv,cpu_intc,3 5 local_timer
>>> 8: 0 0 0 223 riscv,cpu_intc,4 5 local_timer
>>> 47: 337 489 389 35 riscv,plic0,c000000 4 10010000.serial
>>> 48: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 5 10011000.serial
>>> 49: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 51 10040000.spi
>>> 50: 0 0 0 0 riscv,plic0,c000000 52 10041000.spi
>>> 51: 2 14 47 39 riscv,plic0,c000000 6 10050000.spi
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h | 2 --
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/time.c | 21 --------------
>>> drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 11 ++++---
>>> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
>>> index 4dee9d4..2d692d0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
>>> @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
>>> #define INTERRUPT_CAUSE_TIMER 5
>>> #define INTERRUPT_CAUSE_EXTERNAL 9
>>>
>>> -void riscv_timer_interrupt(void);
>>> -
>>> #include <asm-generic/irq.h>
>>>
>>> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_IRQ_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/time.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/time.c
>>> index 94e220e..fbdfec5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/time.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/time.c
>>> @@ -24,27 +24,6 @@
>>>
>>> unsigned long riscv_timebase;
>>>
>>> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, riscv_clock_event);
>>> -
>>> -void riscv_timer_interrupt(void)
>>> -{
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_TIMER
>>> - /*
>>> - * FIXME: This needs to be cleaned up along with the rest of the IRQ
>>> - * handling cleanup. See irq.c for more details.
>>> - */
>>> - struct clock_event_device *evdev = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_clock_event);
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * There are no direct SBI calls to clear pending timer interrupt bit.
>>> - * Disable timer interrupt to ignore pending interrupt until next
>>> - * interrupt.
>>> - */
>>> - csr_clear(sie, SIE_STIE);
>>> - evdev->event_handler(evdev);
>>> -#endif
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static long __init timebase_frequency(void)
>>> {
>>> struct device_node *cpu;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>>> index f4147db..a968a69 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>>> @@ -15,9 +15,12 @@
>>> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>>> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> #include <linux/timer_riscv.h>
>>> #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>>> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>> #include <asm/sbi.h>
>>>
>>> #define MINDELTA 100
>>> @@ -73,6 +76,23 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clocksource, riscv_clocksource) = {
>>> .read = rdtime,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static irqreturn_t riscv_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct clock_event_device *evdev = dev_id;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_TIMER
>>
>> Why the #ifdef? It is always selected at the architecture level.
>>
>
> Correct. It was present in the existing code.
> I will remove it.
>
>
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * There are no direct SBI calls to clear pending timer interrupt bit.
>>> + * Disable timer interrupt to ignore pending interrupt until next
>>> + * interrupt.
>>> + */
>>> + csr_clear(sie, SIE_STIE);
>>> + evdev->event_handler(evdev);
>>> +#endif
>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> static int hart_of_timer(struct device_node *dev)
>>> {
>>> u32 hart;
>>> @@ -100,14 +120,17 @@ static int timer_riscv_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>> clockevents_config_and_register(ce, riscv_timebase, MINDELTA, MAXDELTA);
>>> /* Enable timer interrupt for this cpu */
>>> csr_set(sie, SIE_STIE);
>>> + enable_percpu_irq(ce->irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int timer_riscv_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>> {
>>> + struct clock_event_device *ce = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_clock_event, cpu);
>>> /* Disable timer interrupt for this cpu */
>>> csr_clear(sie, SIE_STIE);
>>> + disable_percpu_irq(ce->irq);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -115,9 +138,36 @@ static int timer_riscv_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>> static int __init timer_riscv_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
>>> {
>>> int err = 0;
>>> - int cpu_id = hart_of_timer(n);
>>> - struct clocksource *cs = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_clocksource, cpu_id);
>>> + int cpu_id, timer_int;
>>> + struct device_node *parent;
>>> + struct clocksource *cs;
>>> + struct clock_event_device *ce;
>>> +
>>> + timer_int = irq_of_parse_and_map(n, 0);
>>> + if (!timer_int) {
>>> + pr_err("Unable to find local timer irq\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> + parent = of_get_parent(n);
>>> + if (!parent) {
>>> + pr_err("Parent of timer node doesn't exist\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> + cpu_id = hart_of_timer(parent);
>>> +
>>> + cs = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_clocksource, cpu_id);
>>> + ce = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_clock_event, cpu_id);
>>> + ce->irq = timer_int;
>>> +
>>> + err = request_percpu_irq(ce->irq, riscv_timer_interrupt,
>>> + "local_timer", &riscv_clock_event);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + pr_err("local timer can't register for interrupt [%d] [%d]\n",
>>> + timer_int, err);
>>> + free_percpu_irq(ce->irq, ce);
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> if (cpu_id == smp_processor_id()) {
>>> clocksource_register_hz(cs, riscv_timebase);
>>> sched_clock_register(timer_riscv_sched_read, 64, riscv_timebase);
>>> @@ -125,11 +175,14 @@ static int __init timer_riscv_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
>>> err = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_RISCV_TIMER_STARTING,
>>> "clockevents/riscv/timer:starting",
>>> timer_riscv_starting_cpu, timer_riscv_dying_cpu);
>>> - if (err)
>>> + if (err) {
>>> pr_err("RISCV timer register failed [%d] for cpu = [%d]\n",
>>> err, cpu_id);
>>> + free_percpu_irq(ce->irq, ce);
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -TIMER_OF_DECLARE(riscv_timer, "riscv", timer_riscv_init_dt);
>>> +TIMER_OF_DECLARE(riscv_timer, "riscv,local-timer", timer_riscv_init_dt);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
>>> index fec897d..fda174f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
>>> @@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> * device interrupts use the generic IRQ mechanisms.
>>> */
>>> switch (cause) {
>>> - case INTERRUPT_CAUSE_TIMER:
>>> - riscv_timer_interrupt();
>>> - break;
>>> case INTERRUPT_CAUSE_SOFTWARE:
>>> riscv_software_interrupt();
>>> break;
>>> @@ -96,7 +93,13 @@ static int riscv_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>>> {
>>> struct riscv_irq_data *data = d->host_data;
>>>
>>> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &data->chip, handle_simple_irq);
>>> + if (hwirq == INTERRUPT_CAUSE_TIMER) {
>>> + irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
>>
>> If you're making the interrupt a percpu_devid, why are you using it as a
>> per-cpu interrupt, and not a percpu_devid? That's just wrong.
>>
>
> I am not quite sure if I understand your point clearly. I tried to
> follow PPI interrupt code in ARM.
>
>> Making it a percpu_devid looks like the right thing to do (all the timer
>> interrupts share the same hwirq). Please fix the timer code accordingly.
>>
>
> I looked at the timer code in arm. Both global & arch timer uses per cpu
> interrupts by parsing DT using irq_of_parse_and_map().
>
> I might have missed something here. Can you please explain a bit more or
> point to me some existing code?
There is clearly something wrong with the way interrupts are numbered:
>>> CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
>>> 5: 271 0 0 0 riscv,cpu_intc,1 5 local_timer
>>> 6: 0 307 0 0 riscv,cpu_intc,2 5 local_timer
>>> 7: 0 0 303 0 riscv,cpu_intc,3 5 local_timer
>>> 8: 0 0 0 223 riscv,cpu_intc,4 5 local_timer
On arm/arm64, we end-up with:
19: 4151 3859 GICv2 30 Level arch_timer
--> A single interrupt number common across all CPUs.
It looks like the issue might well be with the way the interrupt
controller handles those (I suspect it uses a domain per CPU for the
local interrupts, so the whole concept breaks down badly).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 18:01 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Local timer interrupt fix Atish Patra
2018-06-29 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-binding: RISC-V local timer docs Atish Patra
2018-07-02 8:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-03 18:18 ` Atish Patra
2018-06-29 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] riscv: Introduce per cpu based local timer interrupt Atish Patra
2018-07-02 8:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-03 18:28 ` Atish Patra
2018-07-04 8:24 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2018-07-05 1:55 ` Atish Patra
2018-07-05 2:17 ` Anup Patel
2018-07-05 7:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-05 15:42 ` hch at infradead.org
2018-07-05 15:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-05 22:22 ` hch at infradead.org
2018-07-06 8:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-06 9:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 18:00 ` Atish Patra
2018-08-03 0:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-07-05 17:15 ` Atish Patra
2018-08-02 21:53 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c65bc1b-a64c-e93c-84e6-5a576617f64f@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox